| Literature DB >> 29020092 |
Jin-Hee Kim1, Il Kyung Chung2, Kyung-Min Kim1.
Abstract
The Sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam, is difficult to study in genetics and genomics because it is a hexaploid. The sweet potato study not have been performed domestically or internationally. In this study was performed to construct genetic map and quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis. A total of 245 EST-SSR markers were developed, and the map was constructed by using 210 of those markers. The total map length was 1508.1 cM, and the mean distance between markers was 7.2 cM. Fifteen characteristics were investigated for QTLs analysis. According to those, the Four QTLs were identified, and The LOD score was 3.0. Further studies need to develop molecular markers in terms of EST-SSR markers for doing to be capable of efficient breeding. The genetic map created here using EST-SSR markers will facilitate planned breeding of sweet potato cultivars with various desirable traits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29020092 PMCID: PMC5636084 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Distribution and distance of markers by group.
| Group number | No. of mapping markers | Distance (cM) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | 121.9 |
| 2 | 21 | 81.4 |
| 3 | 14 | 98.8 |
| 4 | 16 | 100.9 |
| 5 | 18 | 101.7 |
| 6 | 11 | 91.0 |
| 7 | 19 | 107.6 |
| 8 | 7 | 66.8 |
| 9 | 11 | 146.1 |
| 10 | 9 | 75.7 |
| 11 | 12 | 108.0 |
| 12 | 12 | 123.3 |
| 13 | 11 | 114.7 |
| 14 | 15 | 100.3 |
| 15 | 9 | 69.9 |
| Subtotal | 210 | - |
| Others | 35 | - |
| Total | 245 | 1508.1 |
| Average | - | 7.2 |
a Others: This number was not grouping.
b Average: Interval between makers in genetic map.
Major agronomic characteristics.
| Item | Characters | Parents | Population | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mother | Father | Means | Range | Means | |||
| Above-ground part | Stem | Length of internode (cm) | 2.8 ± 0.4 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 1.1–4.4 | 2.0 ± 0.6 |
| Internode diameter (mm) | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 2.7–7.0 | 4.0 ± 0.7 | ||
| Degree of anthocyanin biosynthesis in terminal bud | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 1.0–3.0 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | ||
| Degree of anthocyanin biosynthesis in burl | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 1.0–3.0 | 1.0 ± 0.6 | ||
| Leaf | Number of lobes per leaf | 7.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 4.0 ± 3.0 | 1.0–5.0 | 3.0 ± 1.6 | |
| Unlobed leaf shape | – | 1.0 ± 0.0 | – | 1.0–2.0 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | ||
| Depth of leaf lobe (mm) | 5.0 ± 0.0 | – | – | 1.0–7.0 | 4.0 ± 1.9 | ||
| Underground part | Root | Root form (shape) | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0–5.0 | 2.0 ± 1.6 |
| Length to width ratio | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 1.1–7.9 | 4.0 ± 1.2 | ||
| Skin thickness (mm) | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 3.3 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 0.8 | 1.1–4.6 | 3.0 ± 0.6 | ||
| Main color of outer skin (△E) | 76.6 ± 2.1 | 67.3 ± 2.0 | 72.0 ± 5.1 | 50.6–87.4 | 76.0 ± 6.7 | ||
| Secondary color of outer skin (△E) | 74.7 ± 3.0 | 66.3 ± 5.0 | 70.5 ± 5.9 | 60.2–85.4 | 76.0 ± 5.1 | ||
| Main color of flesh (△E) | 64.4 ± 2.9 | 70.8 ± 2.2 | 67.6 ± 4.1 | 55.8–102.0 | 73.0 ± 7.8 | ||
| Secondary color of flesh (△E) | 73.7 ± 2.9 | 80.7 ± 2.4 | 77.2 ± 4.4 | 52.9–113.0 | 84.0 ±12.6 | ||
| Depth of root buds(mm) | 2.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 1.0–3.0 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | ||
a Mean ± standard deviation.
b–: Not applicable.
Fig 1Genetic map and QTL mapping associated with sweet potato.
Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis.
| Characters | Group Number | Locus | LOD | Add. | R2
| Marker bordering the QTL | Increasing effect | Closed marker |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length of internode (cm) | 4 | qLi4 | 3.63 | 1.12 | 0.16 | s25-1-1~s1472-1 | Yeseumi | s1472-1 |
| 7 | qLi7 | 4.13 | 1.06 | 0.10 | s1361-3-1 | Yeseumi | s1361-3-1 | |
| 8 | qLi8 | 3.07 | 1.13 | 0.08 | s1328-1~s463-2 | Yeseumi | s1328-1 | |
| Skin thickness (mm) | 4 | qSt4 | 4.65 | -0.33 | 0.05 | s1267-1~s439-1 | Annobeny | s439-1 |
| Main color of outer skin (△E) | 1 | qBsmc1 | 5.40 | 9.50 | 0.01 | s61-1~s1671-2 | Yeseumi | s1671-2 |
| 3 | qBsmc3 | 3.62 | 9.88 | 0.32 | s1301-2-2~s999-1-2 | Yeseumi | s1301-2-2 | |
| 6 | qBsmc6-1 | 4.09 | 9.09 | 0.01 | s1680-1~s571-2 | Yeseumi | s1680-1 | |
| 6 | qBsmc6-2 | 3.94 | -3.38 | 0.01 | s571-2~s207-1 | Annobeny | s571-2 | |
| 7 | qBsmc7-1 | 3.13 | 11.35 | 0.25 | s1685-2~s61-2 | Yeseumi | s1685-2 | |
| 7 | qBsmc7-2 | 4.28 | 11.95 | 0.25 | s10-2~s422-2-2 | Yeseumi | s422-2-2 | |
| 8 | qBsmc8-1 | 3.06 | 10.80 | 0.65 | s1328-1~s463-2 | Yeseumi | s1328-1 | |
| 8 | qBsmc8-2 | 3.65 | 11.38 | 0.95 | s463-2~s1191-2-2 | Yeseumi | s463-2 | |
| 9 | qBsmc9-1 | 4.31 | 9.07 | 0.01 | s1191-3-2~s996-2-2 | Yeseumi | s1191-3-2 | |
| 9 | qBsmc9-2 | 6.82 | 10.50 | 0.93 | s2-2~s71-4 | Yeseumi | s71-4 | |
| 12 | qBsmc12 | 3.25 | 10.98 | 0.01 | s1437-4~s1437-2 | Yeseumi | s1437-4 | |
| 13 | qBsmc13 | 4.54 | -8.18 | 0.01 | s678-2~s42-4 | Annobeny | s678-2 | |
| 14 | qBsmc14-1 | 4.50 | 10.32 | 0.78 | s367-3~s639-1-1 | Yeseumi | s639-1-1 | |
| 14 | qBsmc14-2 | 3.99 | 10.32 | 0.74 | s639-1-1~s1685-1 | Yeseumi | s639-1-1 | |
| 14 | qBsmc14-3 | 3.03 | 4.59 | 0.01 | s277-2~s429-2 | Yeseumi | s429-2 | |
| Secondary color of outer skin (△E) | 6 | qBssc6 | 3.49 | 3.79 | 0.01 | s1680-1~s571-2 | Yeseumi | s571-2 |
| 13 | qBssc13 | 3.22 | 5.95 | 0.54 | s678-2~s42-4 | Yeseumi | s42-4 |
a Add.: Positive values for additive effect indicate that alleles from ‘Yeseumi’ are in the direction of increasing the traits.
b R2: The proportion of evaluated phenotypic variation attributable to a particular QTL was estimated by the coefficient of determination.
c Marker bordering the QTL: Markers within the significance threshold on each border of the QTL range.
d Increasing effect: The increase allele is the source of the allele causing an increase in the measured trait.