Literature DB >> 29019167

Hybrid Simulation in Teaching Clinical Breast Examination to Medical Students.

Joseph Nassif1, Abdul-Karim Sleiman2,3, Anwar H Nassar1, Sima Naamani4, Rana Sharara-Chami5,6,7.   

Abstract

Clinical breast examination (CBE) is traditionally taught to third-year medical students using a lecture and a tabletop breast model. The opportunity to clinically practice CBE depends on patient availability and willingness to be examined by students, especially in culturally sensitive environments. We propose the use of a hybrid simulation model consisting of a standardized patient (SP) wearing a silicone breast simulator jacket and hypothesize that this, compared to traditional teaching methods, would result in improved learning. Consenting third-year medical students (N = 82) at a university-affiliated tertiary care center were cluster-randomized into two groups: hybrid simulation (breast jacket + SP) and control (tabletop breast model). Students received the standard lecture by instructors blinded to the randomization, followed by randomization group-based learning and practice sessions. Two weeks later, participants were assessed in an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), which included three stations with SPs blinded to the intervention. The SPs graded the students on CBE completeness, and students completed a self-assessment of their performance and confidence during the examination. CBE completeness scores did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.889). Hybrid simulation improved lesion identification grades (p < 0.001) without increasing false positives. Hybrid simulation relieved the fear of missing a lesion on CBE (p = 0.043) and increased satisfaction with the teaching method among students (p = 0.002). As a novel educational tool, hybrid simulation improves the sensitivity of CBE performed by medical students without affecting its specificity. Hybrid simulation may play a role in increasing the confidence of medical students during CBE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical breast examination; Medical education; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29019167     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1287-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  11 in total

Review 1.  Ethical issues in the design and conduct of cluster randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  S J Edwards; D A Braunholtz; R J Lilford; A J Stevens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-22

2.  Fear of missing a lesion: use of simulated breast models to decrease student anxiety when learning clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  Carla M Pugh; Lawrence H Salud
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Simulation training for breast and pelvic physical examination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C A Dilaveri; J H Szostek; A T Wang; D A Cook
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Screening for breast cancer in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.628

Review 5.  Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Stanley J Hamstra; Ryan Brydges; Benjamin Zendejas; Jason H Szostek; Amy T Wang; Patricia J Erwin; Rose Hatala
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  [Setting-up and evaluation of an educational program for the teaching of breast and pelvic examination in undergraduate medical students: the "PRESAGE" simulation center experience of the medicine university of Lille, France].

Authors:  G Piessen; A Louvet; L Robriquet; E Bailleux; M Jourdain; M Cosson
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Fertil       Date:  2014-08-20

7.  The effectiveness of using standardized patients to improve community physician skills in mammography counseling and clinical breast exam.

Authors:  M E Costanza; R Luckmann; M E Quirk; L Clemow; M J White; A M Stoddard
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 8.  Clinical breast examination: practical recommendations for optimizing performance and reporting.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Judy Hannan; Janet Osuch; Marianne H Alciati; Cornelia Baines; Mary Barton; Janet Kay Bobo; Cathy Coleman; Mary Dolan; Ginny Gaumer; Daniel Kopans; Susan Kutner; Dorothy S Lane; Herschel Lawson; Helen Meissner; Candace Moorman; Henry Pennypacker; Peggy Pierce; Eva Sciandra; Robert Smith; Ralph Coates
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Use of breast simulators compared with standardized patients in teaching the clinical breast examination to medical students.

Authors:  Jane R Schubart; Lillian Erdahl; J Stanley Smith; Heather Purichia; Gordon L Kauffman; Rena B Kass
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  An evaluation of standardized patients in improving clinical breast examinations for military women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ann Coleman; Carol Beth Stewart; Sheryl Wilson; Mary J Cantrell; Patricia O'Sullivan; Dana Oaddams Carthron; Linda C Wood
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

View more
  3 in total

1.  Medical Simulation-Based Learning Outcomes in Pre-Clinical Medical Education.

Authors:  Maxwell J Jabaay; Dario A Marotta; Stephen L Aita; Dianne B Walker; Leah O Grcevich; Victor Camba; James R Nolin; James Lyons; John Giannini
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-03

2.  Breast Cancer Knowledge and Practice of Breast Self-Examination among Female University Students, Gaza.

Authors:  Samira S Abo Al-Shiekh; Mohamed Awadelkarim Ibrahim; Yasser S Alajerami
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2021-04-27

3.  The 2019 WACEM Expert Document on Hybrid Simulation for Transforming Health-care Simulation Through "Mixing and Matching".

Authors:  Fatimah Lateef; Xin Yi Too
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2019-11-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.