Literature DB >> 15675645

Vibrotactile localization on the abdomen: effects of place and space.

Roger W Cholewiak1, J Christopher Brill, Anja Schwab.   

Abstract

In this study, we explore the conditions for accurate localization of vibrotactile stimuli presented to the abdomen. Tactile orientation systems intended to provide mobility information for people who are blind depend on accurate identification of location of stimuli on the skin, as do systems designed to indicate target positions in space or the status of remotely operated devices to pilots or engineers. The spatial acuity of the skin has been examined for simple touch, but not for the types of vibrating signals used in such devices. The ability to localize vibratory stimuli was examined at sites around the abdomen and found to be a function of separation among loci and, most significantly, of place on the trunk. Neither the structures underlying the skin nor the types of tactor tested appeared to affect localization. Evidence was found for anatomically defined anchor points that provide localization referents that enhance performance even with wide target spacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15675645     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  22 in total

1.  Comparison between a dorsal and a belt tactile display prototype for decoding physiological events in the operating room.

Authors:  Pierre Barralon; Guy Dumont; Stephan K W Schwarz; William Magruder; J Mark Ansermino
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Guidance of visual direction by topographical vibrotactile cues on the torso.

Authors:  Francois Asseman; Adolfo M Bronstein; Michael A Gresty
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reference frames for coding touch location depend on the task.

Authors:  Lisa M Pritchett; Michael J Carnevale; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Vibrotactile masking through the body.

Authors:  Sarah D'Amour; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Visual detail about the body modulates tactile localisation biases.

Authors:  Aaron N Margolis; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Finding Parameters around the Abdomen for a Vibrotactile System: Healthy and Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Helena Gonçalves; Rui Moreira; Ana Rodrigues; Cristina Santos
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Tactile localization biases are modulated by gaze direction.

Authors:  Sonia Medina; Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Biofeedback improves postural control recovery from multi-axis discrete perturbations.

Authors:  Kathleen H Sienko; M David Balkwill; Conrad Wall
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  The effects of actuator selection on non-volitional postural responses to torso-based vibrotactile stimulation.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Bernard J Martin; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  The experience of new sensorimotor contingencies by sensory augmentation.

Authors:  Kai Kaspar; Sabine König; Jessika Schwandt; Peter König
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2014-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.