Literature DB >> 29018910

Incidence of delayed union one year after peri-acetabular osteotomy based on computed tomography.

Shunsuke Akiho1, Koichi Kinoshita2, Ayumi Matsunaga2, Satohiro Ishii2, Hajime Seo2, Jun Nishio2, Takuaki Yamamoto2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pubic bone nonunion and delayed union are reported as post-operative complications after peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO). However, few studies have determined the incidence of delayed union using computed tomography (CT) scans. This study aimed to determine the incidence of delayed union at one year after PAO using X-ray and CT scans.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 150 hips in 132 consecutive patients with acetabular dysplasia who underwent PAO between January 2012 and June 2016 and evaluated 107 hips for which pelvic CT scans taken at one year after PAO were available. Clinical evaluations included age at surgery, weight, body mass index (BMI) and history. Radiographic evaluations were to assess pubic, ischial and iliac delayed union at one year post-operatively.
RESULTS: Based on X-ray analysis, the incidence of delayed union in the pubic, ischial and iliac bones was 11.2% (12 hips), 5.6% (6 hips) and 0% (0 hips), respectively, and20.6% (22 hips), 8.4% (9 hips) and 0% (0 hips), respectively, based on CT scans.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of delayed union of the pubis and ischium at one year after PAO according to CT scans was higher than that based on X-ray imaging. CT scans are useful in patients with some symptoms at the osteotomy site. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography scans; Delayed union; Nonunion; Peri-acetabular osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29018910     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3656-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Periacetabular osteotomy: preoperative radiographic predictors of outcome.

Authors:  Stephen Murphy; Rahul Deshmukh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Curved periacetabular osteotomy for treatment of dysplastic hip.

Authors:  Masatoshi Naito; Kei Shiramizu; Yuichiro Akiyoshi; Masamitsu Ezoe; Yoshinari Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The incidence of stress fracture following peri-acetabular osteotomy: an under-reported complication.

Authors:  A Malviya; W Dandachli; Z Beech; M J Bankes; J D Witt
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.082

5.  Multimodal nerve monitoring during periacetabular osteotomy identifies surgical steps associated with risk of injury.

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Travis Heare; Lauryn Kestel; Patricia Oliver; Willy Boucharel; Jason Koerner; Kim Strupp
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The Anatomical Course of the Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve with Special Attention to the Anterior Approach to the Hip Joint.

Authors:  Diana Rudin; Mirjana Manestar; Oliver Ullrich; Johannes Erhardt; Karl Grob
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement with surgical dislocation and débridement in young adults.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Jill A Erickson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  The periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum 2 year followup in more than 100 hips.

Authors:  S J Trumble; K A Mayo; J W Mast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The state of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery as an indication for rotational acetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Y Yasunaga; Y Ikuta; T Kanazawa; K Takahashi; T Hisatome
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-09

10.  Intermediate to long-term results following the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy and predictors of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Travis Matheney; Young-Jo Kim; David Zurakowski; Catherine Matero; Michael Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Computer assistance in hip preservation surgery-current status and introduction of our system.

Authors:  Klemen Stražar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  What the papers say.

Authors:  Ajay Malviya
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2017-12-06

3.  Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of bioactive glass (S53P4) in the treatment of non-unions of the tibia and femur: study protocol of a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Michael C Tanner; Raban Heller; Fabian Westhauser; Matthias Miska; Thomas Ferbert; Christian Fischer; Simone Gantz; Gerhard Schmidmaier; Patrick Haubruck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Outcomes of computer-assisted peri-acetabular osteotomy compared with conventional osteotomy in hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imai; Tomomi Kamada; Joji Miyawaki; Akira Maruishi; Naohiko Mashima; Hiromasa Miura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Delayed union of a surgically treated fragility fracture of the pelvis: A case report.

Authors:  Yohei Yanagisawa; Yukei Matsumoto; Tetsuya Hoshino; Yoshiaki Inoue; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-05-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.