| Literature DB >> 32480331 |
Yohei Yanagisawa1, Yukei Matsumoto2, Tetsuya Hoshino3, Yoshiaki Inoue4, Masashi Yamazaki5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There are no universally accepted treatment strategies for fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs). The incidence of delayed union or non-union of Type IIIa FFP is still unknown. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We describe a case of delayed union of a Type IIIa FFP. A 96-year-old female patient who lives independently accidentally fell when exiting a car. The diagnosis of Type IIIa FFP with displaced left ilium and left pubic rami fracture. Surgical repair was performed using an anterior intrapelvic approach with constructs made using two reconstruction contoured plates to bridge the medial edge and middle part of the fracture. This case was revealed delayed union. The periodic CT examinations were performed to determine the progress of bone union. The patient returned to most social activities including living independently and the Modified Majeed score was 94 at 12 months post-operation. DISCUSSION: For the case of TypeⅢa FFP, soft tissue is spread over a wide area. When the fracture site of ilium was exposed, the cortical bone was found to be thin with poor blood flow. There is a possibility that the blood flow was hindered by subperiosteal elevation of the iliacus muscle from the internal iliac fossa in this case.Entities:
Keywords: Case report; Delayed union; Fragility fractures of the pelvic ring; Non-union; Osteosynthesis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32480331 PMCID: PMC7262378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.04.093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2210-2612
Fig. 1Representative pre-operative X-ray images taken during admission for fragility fracture of the pelvic ring. (a) Pre-operative pelvic anteroposterior view. (b) Pre-operative pelvic inlet view. (c) Pre-operative pelvic outlet view.
Fig. 2Representative post-operative X-ray images taken following surgical repair of fragility fracture of the pelvic ring. (a) Post-operative pelvic anteroposterior view. (b) Post-operative pelvic inlet view. (c) Post-operative pelvic outlet view.
Fig. 3Post-operative computed tomography coronal views. Computed tomography images showing the process of union of the fracture site at (a) 5, (b) 12 and (c) 19 months after surgery reveal that union occurred between 12 and 19 months post-operatively.
Fig. 4Post-operative computed tomography axial views. Computed tomography images showing the process of union of the fracture site at (a) 5, (b) 12 and (c) 19 months after surgery reveal that union occurred between 12 and 19 months post-operatively.
Fig. 5Post-operative computed tomography sagittal views. Computed tomography images showing the process of union of the fracture site at (a) 5, (b) 12 and (c) 19 months after surgery reveal that union occurred between 12 and 19 months post-operatively.