Eli Puterman1, Jordan Weiss2, Mark R Beauchamp1, Jacqueline Mogle3, David M Almeida4. 1. School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia. 2. Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania. 3. College of Nursing, Pennsylvania State University. 4. College of Health and Human Development, Pennsylvania State University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The results from experimental studies indicate that physically active individuals remain calmer and report less anxiety after the induction of a standardized stressor. The current study extends this research to real life, and examines whether daily physical activity attenuates negative affect that occurs in response to naturally occurring daily stressors. METHOD: The current study used data from the second wave of the National Study of Daily Experiences, a sub-study of the second wave of the Midlife in the United States Study (MIDUS-II) of 2,022 individuals aged 33-84 questioned nightly for eight consecutive days about their general affect and affective responses to stressful events and their engagement in physical activity. RESULTS: Results indicated that while negative affect is significantly elevated on days with stressful events compared to days free of events in all individuals, these effects are attenuated in those who remain physically active when compared to those who were underactive. This was also true for any day participants were physically active. Importantly, negative affect in response to any specific stressor was reduced the closer in time that the stressor occurred to the bout of exercise in underactive participants, while, in active participants, negative affect in response to any stressor remained low throughout the entire day that participants reported that they were active. CONCLUSION: Given the significant mental and physical health implications of elevated affective reactivity observed in previous studies, the current study sheds further light on the importance of remaining physically active in times of stress. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: The results from experimental studies indicate that physically active individuals remain calmer and report less anxiety after the induction of a standardized stressor. The current study extends this research to real life, and examines whether daily physical activity attenuates negative affect that occurs in response to naturally occurring daily stressors. METHOD: The current study used data from the second wave of the National Study of Daily Experiences, a sub-study of the second wave of the Midlife in the United States Study (MIDUS-II) of 2,022 individuals aged 33-84 questioned nightly for eight consecutive days about their general affect and affective responses to stressful events and their engagement in physical activity. RESULTS: Results indicated that while negative affect is significantly elevated on days with stressful events compared to days free of events in all individuals, these effects are attenuated in those who remain physically active when compared to those who were underactive. This was also true for any day participants were physically active. Importantly, negative affect in response to any specific stressor was reduced the closer in time that the stressor occurred to the bout of exercise in underactive participants, while, in active participants, negative affect in response to any stressor remained low throughout the entire day that participants reported that they were active. CONCLUSION: Given the significant mental and physical health implications of elevated affective reactivity observed in previous studies, the current study sheds further light on the importance of remaining physically active in times of stress. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Hannah Arem; Steven C Moore; Alpa Patel; Patricia Hartge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Kala Visvanathan; Peter T Campbell; Michal Freedman; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hans Olov Adami; Martha S Linet; I-Min Lee; Charles E Matthews Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Kimberly G Lockwood; Luke Peddie; Alexandra D Crosswell; Benjamin A Hives; Natalie Slopen; David M Almeida; Eli Puterman Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2022-10-03
Authors: Elissa S Epel; Alexandra D Crosswell; Stefanie E Mayer; Aric A Prather; George M Slavich; Eli Puterman; Wendy Berry Mendes Journal: Front Neuroendocrinol Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 8.606
Authors: Stephanie G Kerrigan; Leah Schumacher; Stephanie M Manasse; Caitlin Loyka; Meghan L Butryn; Evan M Forman Journal: Psychol Sport Exerc Date: 2019-03-26
Authors: Stephanie G Kerrigan; Meagan M Carr; Jessica L Lawson; Janet A Lydecker; Carlos M Grilo Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2022-02-02 Impact factor: 3.008
Authors: R J Neumann; K F Ahrens; B Kollmann; N Goldbach; A Chmitorz; D Weichert; C J Fiebach; M Wessa; R Kalisch; K Lieb; O Tüscher; M M Plichta; A Reif; S Matura Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 5.760
Authors: Laura Giessing; Julia Kannen; Jana Strahler; Marie Ottilie Frenkel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 3.390