Jared M Tucker1, Gregory J Welk, Nicholas K Beyler. 1. Department of Health, Nutrition and Exercise Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58108-6050, USA. jared.tucker@ndsu.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To date, no study has objectively measured physical activity levels among U.S. adults according to the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAGA). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess self-reported and objectively measured physical activity among U.S. adults according to the PAGA. METHODS: Using data from the NHANES 2005-2006, the PAGA were assessed using three physical activity calculations: moderate plus vigorous physical activity ≥150 minutes/week (MVPA); moderate plus two instances of vigorous physical activity ≥150 minutes/week (M2VPA); and time spent above 3 METs ≥500 MET-minutes/week (METPA). Self-reported physical activity included leisure, transportation, and household activities. Objective activity was measured using Actigraph accelerometers that were worn for 7 consecutive days. Analyses were conducted in 2009-2010. RESULTS: U.S. adults reported 324.5 ± 18.6 minutes/week (M ± SE) of moderate physical activity and 73.6 ± 3.9 minutes/week of vigorous physical activity, although accelerometry estimates were 45.1 ± 4.6 minutes/week of moderate physical activity and 18.6 ± 6.6 minutes/week of vigorous physical activity. The proportion of adults meeting the PAGA according to M2VPA was 62.0% for self-report and 9.6% for accelerometry. CONCLUSIONS: According to the NHANES 2005-2006, fewer than 10% of U.S. adults met the PAGA according to accelerometry. However, physical activity estimates vary substantially depending on whether self-reported or measured via accelerometer.
BACKGROUND: To date, no study has objectively measured physical activity levels among U.S. adults according to the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (PAGA). PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess self-reported and objectively measured physical activity among U.S. adults according to the PAGA. METHODS: Using data from the NHANES 2005-2006, the PAGA were assessed using three physical activity calculations: moderate plus vigorous physical activity ≥150 minutes/week (MVPA); moderate plus two instances of vigorous physical activity ≥150 minutes/week (M2VPA); and time spent above 3 METs ≥500 MET-minutes/week (METPA). Self-reported physical activity included leisure, transportation, and household activities. Objective activity was measured using Actigraph accelerometers that were worn for 7 consecutive days. Analyses were conducted in 2009-2010. RESULTS: U.S. adults reported 324.5 ± 18.6 minutes/week (M ± SE) of moderate physical activity and 73.6 ± 3.9 minutes/week of vigorous physical activity, although accelerometry estimates were 45.1 ± 4.6 minutes/week of moderate physical activity and 18.6 ± 6.6 minutes/week of vigorous physical activity. The proportion of adults meeting the PAGA according to M2VPA was 62.0% for self-report and 9.6% for accelerometry. CONCLUSIONS: According to the NHANES 2005-2006, fewer than 10% of U.S. adults met the PAGA according to accelerometry. However, physical activity estimates vary substantially depending on whether self-reported or measured via accelerometer.
Authors: Molly B Conroy; Kathleen L Sward; Kathleen C Spadaro; Dana Tudorascu; Irina Karpov; Bobby L Jones; Andrea M Kriska; Wishwa N Kapoor Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jennifer L Jarvie; Ambarish Pandey; Colby R Ayers; Jonathan M McGavock; Martin Sénéchal; Jarett D Berry; Kershaw V Patel; Darren K McGuire Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Michael Todd; Marc A Adams; Jonathan Kurka; Terry L Conway; Kelli L Cain; Matthew P Buman; Lawrence D Frank; James F Sallis; Abby C King Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Daniel K White; Catrine Tudor-Locke; David T Felson; K Doug Gross; Jingbo Niu; Michael Nevitt; Cora E Lewis; James Torner; Tuhina Neogi Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Sarah E Linke; Britta A Larsen; Becky Marquez; Andrea Mendoza-Vasconez; Bess H Marcus Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2016-03-06 Impact factor: 8.194