Literature DB >> 28994796

The Knob Supination Task: A Semi-automated Method for Assessing Forelimb Function in Rats.

Samuel D Butensky1, Thelma Bethea1, Joshua Santos1, Anil Sindhurakar1, Eric Meyers2, Andrew M Sloan2, Robert L Rennaker2, Jason B Carmel3.   

Abstract

Tasks that accurately measure dexterity in animal models are critical to understand hand function. Current rat behavioral tasks that measure dexterity largely use video analysis of reaching or food manipulation. While these tasks are easy to implement and are robust across disease models, they are subjective and laborious for the experimenter. Automating traditional tasks or creating new automated tasks can make the tasks more efficient, objective, and quantitative. Since rats are less dexterous than primates, central nervous system (CNS) injury produces more subtle deficits in dexterity, however, supination is highly affected in rodents and crucial to hand function in primates. Therefore, we designed a semi-automated task that measures forelimb supination in rats. Rats are trained to reach and grasp a knob-shaped manipulandum and turn the manipulandum in supination to receive a reward. Rats can acquire the skill within 20 ± 5 days. While the early part of training is highly supervised, much of the training is done without direct supervision. The task reliably and reproducibly captures subtle deficits after injury and shows functional recovery that accurately reflects clinical recovery curves. Analysis of data is performed by specialized software through a graphical user interface that is designed to be intuitive. We also give solutions to common problems encountered during training, and show that minor corrections to behavior early in training produce reliable acquisition of supination. Thus, the knob supination task provides efficient and quantitative evaluation of a critical movement for dexterity in rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28994796      PMCID: PMC5752340          DOI: 10.3791/56341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  22 in total

1.  Marker placement to describe the wrist movements during activities of daily living in cyclical tasks.

Authors:  Alessio Murgia; Peter J Kyberd; Paul H Chappell; Colin M Light
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Systems neurobiology of restorative neurology and future directions for repair of the damaged motor systems.

Authors:  John H Martin
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 1.876

3.  Feed-forward control of preshaping in the rat is mediated by the corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Jason B Carmel; Sangsoo Kim; Marcel Brus-Ramer; John H Martin
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  The isometric pull task: a novel automated method for quantifying forelimb force generation in rats.

Authors:  Seth A Hays; Navid Khodaparast; Andrew M Sloan; Daniel R Hulsey; Maritza Pantoja; Andrea D Ruiz; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  A novel method for assessing proximal and distal forelimb function in the rat: the Irvine, Beatties and Bresnahan (IBB) forelimb scale.

Authors:  Karen-Amanda Irvine; Adam R Ferguson; Kathleen D Mitchell; Stephanie B Beattie; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  The impairments in reaching and the movements of compensation in rats with motor cortex lesions: an endpoint, videorecording, and movement notation analysis.

Authors:  I Q Whishaw; S M Pellis; B P Gorny; V C Pellis
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1991-01-31       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Quantitative kinematic characterization of reaching impairments in mice after a stroke.

Authors:  Stefano Lai; Alessandro Panarese; Cristina Spalletti; Claudia Alia; Alessio Ghionzoli; Matteo Caleo; Silvestro Micera
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  An automated behavioral box to assess forelimb function in rats.

Authors:  Chelsea C Wong; Dhakshin S Ramanathan; Tanuj Gulati; Seok Joon Won; Karunesh Ganguly
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  The supination assessment task: An automated method for quantifying forelimb rotational function in rats.

Authors:  Eric Meyers; Anil Sindhurakar; Rachel Choi; Ruby Solorzano; Taylor Martinez; Andrew Sloan; Jason Carmel; Michael P Kilgard; Robert L Rennaker; Seth Hays
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  The vermicelli handling test: a simple quantitative measure of dexterous forepaw function in rats.

Authors:  Rachel P Allred; DeAnna L Adkins; Martin T Woodlee; Lincoln C Husbands; Mónica A Maldonado; Jacqueline R Kane; Timothy Schallert; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  3 in total

1.  Automated Forelimb Tasks for Rodents: Current Advantages and Limitations, and Future Promise.

Authors:  Anil Sindhurakar; Samuel D Butensky; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  Behavioral testing in animal models of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  K Fouad; C Ng; D M Basso
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.330

3.  Plasticity in One Hemisphere, Control From Two: Adaptation in Descending Motor Pathways After Unilateral Corticospinal Injury in Neonatal Rats.

Authors:  Tong-Chun Wen; Sophia Lall; Corey Pagnotta; James Markward; Disha Gupta; Shivakeshavan Ratnadurai-Giridharan; Jacqueline Bucci; Lucy Greenwald; Madelyn Klugman; N Jeremy Hill; Jason B Carmel
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.492

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.