Literature DB >> 28992700

Flexibility vs Preorganization: Direct Comparison of Binding Kinetics for a Disordered Peptide and Its Exact Preorganized Analogues.

A S Saglam1, D W Wang1, M C Zwier2, L T Chong1.   

Abstract

Many intrinsically disordered proteins, which are prevalent in nature, fold only upon binding their structured partner proteins. Such proteins have been hypothesized to have a kinetic advantage over their folded, preorganized analogues in binding their partner proteins. Here we determined the effects of ligand preorganization on the kon for a biomedically important system: an intrinsically disordered p53 peptide ligand and the MDM2 protein receptor. Based on direct simulations of binding pathways, computed kon values for fully disordered and preorganized p53 peptide analogues were within error of each other, indicating little if any kinetic advantage to being disordered or preorganized for binding the MDM2 protein. We also examined the effects of increasing the concentration of MDM2 on the extent to which its mechanism of binding to the p53 peptide is induced fit vs conformational selection. Results predict that the mechanism is solely induced fit if the unfolded state of the peptide is more stable than its folded state; otherwise, the mechanism shifts from being dominated by conformational selection at low MDM2 concentration to induced fit at high MDM2 concentration. Taken together, our results are relevant to any protein binding process that involves a disordered peptide of a similar length that forms a single α-helix upon binding a partner protein. Such disorder-to-helix transitions are common among protein interactions of disordered proteins and are therefore of fundamental biological interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28992700      PMCID: PMC5903555          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b08486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  42 in total

1.  Roles of native topology and chain-length scaling in protein folding: a simulation study with a Go-like model.

Authors:  N Koga; S Takada
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-10-12       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm.

Authors:  P E Wright; H J Dyson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Dynamics and mechanisms of coupled protein folding and binding reactions.

Authors:  Thomas Kiefhaber; Annett Bachmann; Kristine Steen Jensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Engineering a signal transduction mechanism for protein-based biosensors.

Authors:  Jonathan E Kohn; Kevin W Plaxco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Intrinsically disordered p53 extreme C-terminus binds to S100B(betabeta) through "fly-casting".

Authors:  Jianhan Chen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Weighted-ensemble Brownian dynamics simulations for protein association reactions.

Authors:  G A Huber; S Kim
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Consequences of inducing intrinsic disorder in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  Grigorios Papadakos; Amit Sharma; Lorna E Lancaster; Rebecca Bowen; Renata Kaminska; Andrew P Leech; Daniel Walker; Christina Redfield; Colin Kleanthous
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Efficient Atomistic Simulation of Pathways and Calculation of Rate Constants for a Protein-Peptide Binding Process: Application to the MDM2 Protein and an Intrinsically Disordered p53 Peptide.

Authors:  Matthew C Zwier; Adam J Pratt; Joshua L Adelman; Joseph W Kaus; Daniel M Zuckerman; Lillian T Chong
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 6.475

9.  Coupled folding and binding with 2D Window-Exchange Umbrella Sampling.

Authors:  Alex Dickson; Logan S Ahlstrom; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 10.  Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis.

Authors:  M S Greenblatt; W P Bennett; M Hollstein; C C Harris
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Markov State Models to Elucidate Ligand Binding Mechanism.

Authors:  Yunhui Ge; Vincent A Voelz
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Tuning Free Energy by Backbone Conformational Entropy: A Strategy from Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Chia-En A Chang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Computational Estimation of Microsecond to Second Atomistic Folding Times.

Authors:  Upendra Adhikari; Barmak Mostofian; Jeremy Copperman; Sundar Raman Subramanian; Andrew A Petersen; Daniel M Zuckerman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Thermodynamics and Free Energy Landscape of BAR-Domain Dimerization from Molecular Simulations.

Authors:  Adip Jhaveri; Dhruw Maisuria; Matthew Varga; Dariush Mohammadyani; Margaret E Johnson
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Dynamic stability of salt stable cowpea chlorotic mottle virus capsid protein dimers and pentamers of dimers.

Authors:  Janos Szoverfi; Szilard N Fejer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Folding and self-assembly of short intrinsically disordered peptides and protein regions.

Authors:  Pablo G Argudo; Juan J Giner-Casares
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-01-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.