Literature DB >> 25406292

Objective assessment of corneal staining using digital image analysis.

Yeoun Sook Chun1, Woong Bae Yoon2, Kwang Gi Kim2, In Ki Park3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To validate a new objective digital image analysis technique to evaluate corneal staining.
METHODS: One hundred photographs of corneal staining from various ocular surface diseases in 100 patients were quantified by a new strategy: a combination of the difference of Gaussians (DoG) edge detection for morphologic properties of corneal erosions and the red-green-blue (RGB) systems and hue-saturation-value (HSV) color model for detection of color. To enhance the image, we adopted a median filter, Otsu thresholding, and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE). To validate the diagnostic value of this new strategy, the same photographs were also graded by two independent clinicians using the Oxford scheme and the National Eye Institute/Industry (NEI)-recommended guidelines. The correlation between the average subjective grade and objective image analysis measurement was evaluated using the Pearson's correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: The new algorithm showed a strong correlation with the clinical grading scale in the Oxford scheme and the NEI-recommended guidelines (R = 0.850 and 0.903, P < 0.001, respectively). The repeatability of the objective measurement was excellent (R = 0.994).
CONCLUSIONS: The new algorithm showed excellent correlation with the traditional subjective clinical grading scales. It may be useful for objective assessment of corneal staining, independent of disease conditions. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical grading; corneal staining; correlation; objective measurement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25406292     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  11 in total

1.  Development and Evaluation of Semiautomated Quantification of Lissamine Green Staining of the Bulbar Conjunctiva From Digital Images.

Authors:  Vatinee Y Bunya; Min Chen; Yuanjie Zheng; Mina Massaro-Giordano; James Gee; Ebenezer Daniel; Ryan O'Sullivan; Eli Smith; Richard A Stone; Maureen G Maguire
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.389

2.  Choriocapillaris Imaging Using Multiple En Face Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Image Averaging.

Authors:  Akihito Uji; Siva Balasubramanian; Jianqin Lei; Elmira Baghdasaryan; Mayss Al-Sheikh; SriniVas R Sadda
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  An Automated Grading and Diagnosis System for Evaluation of Dry Eye Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayşe Bağbaba; Baha Şen; Dursun Delen; Betül Seher Uysal
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Objective Assessment of Ocular Surface Response to Contact Lens Wear in Presbyopic Contact Lens Wearers of Asian Descent.

Authors:  Michel Guillon; Kathy Dumbleton; Panagiotis Theodoratos; Trisha Patel; Tom Karkkainen; Kurt Moody
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.018

5.  A novel scale for describing corneal staining.

Authors:  Jill Woods; Jalaiah Varikooty; Desmond Fonn; Lyndon W Jones
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-19

6.  Multimodal Assessment of Corneal Erosions Using Optical Coherence Tomography and Automated Grading of Fluorescein Staining in a Rabbit Dry Eye Model.

Authors:  Ifat Sher; Adi Tzameret; Alicja M Szalapak; Tomer Carmeli; Estela Derazne; Noa Avni-Zauberman; Arie L Marcovich; Guy Ben Simon; Ygal Rotenstreich
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Assessment of Corneal Fluorescein Staining in Different Dry Eye Subtypes Using Digital Image Analysis.

Authors:  Marc Pellegrini; Federic Bernabei; Fabian Moscardelli; Ald Vagge; Riccard Scotto; Cristin Bovone; Vincenz Scorcia; Giusepp Giannaccare
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Awareness of treatment: A source of bias in subjective grading of ocular complications.

Authors:  Genis Cardona; Noelia Esterich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Automated vs. human evaluation of corneal staining.

Authors:  R Kourukmas; M Roth; G Geerling
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Semi-MsST-GAN: A Semi-Supervised Segmentation Method for Corneal Ulcer Segmentation in Slit-Lamp Images.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Meng Wang; Weifang Zhu; Lianyu Wang; Zhongyue Chen; Yuanyuan Peng; Fei Shi; Yi Zhou; Chenpu Yao; Xinjian Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.