| Literature DB >> 28983167 |
Hala Mounir Agha1, Hala S Hamza1, Alyaa Kotby2, Mona E L Ganzoury2, Nanies Soliman2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the left ventricular function before and after transcatheter percutaneous patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure, and to identify the predictors of myocardial dysfunction post-PDA closure if present.Entities:
Keywords: Global myocardial function; Longitudinal strain; Patent ductus arterious; Tissue Doppler imaging; Transcatheter
Year: 2017 PMID: 28983167 PMCID: PMC5623030 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2017.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Saudi Heart Assoc ISSN: 1016-7315
Demographic data of the studied population.
| Cases ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (range) | 2.88 ± 2.76 (1–12) | 3.66 ± 2.41 (1–9) |
| Median | 2 | 3 |
| Mean SD (range) | 12.89 8.44 (5–41) | 14.10 4.99 (6–28) |
| Median | 10 | 13.25 |
| Mean ± SD (range) | 12.89 ± 8.44 (5–41) | 14.10 ± 4.99 (6–28) |
| Median | 10 | 13.25 |
| Male | 14 (27.5%) | 12(60%) |
| Female | 37 (72.5%) | 8 (40%) |
BSA = body surface area; SD = standard deviation.
Comparison of left ventricular end diastolic diameter, left atrium/aorta ratio, ejection fraction, and fractional shortening between cases at baseline and post-PDA closure, and controls.
| Controls ( | Cases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preclosure ( | Postclosure | ||||
| 48 h ( | 1 mo ( | 6 mo ( | |||
| LVEDD (cm) | 3.13 ± 0.5 | 3.50 ± 0.6 | 3.29 ± 0.6 | 3.07 ± 0.6 | 2.91 ± 0.6 |
| LA/AO | 1.42 ± 0.3 | 1.68 ± 0.4 | 1.322 ± 0.3 | 1.16 ± 0.3 | 1.09 ± 0.3 |
| EF (%) | 68.6 ± 6.2 | 70.1 ± 6.5 | 63.1 ± 5.8 | 67.5 ± 5.5 | 69.2 ± 5.6 |
| FS (%) | 38.4 ± 5.03 | 38.7 ± 5.3 | 32.9 ± 4.5 | 36.5 ± 5.1 | 37.6 ± 4.6 |
EF = ejection fraction; FS = fractional shortening; LA/AO = left atrium diameter to aortic annulus ratio; LVEDD = left ventricular end diastolic diameter; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus.
p = 0.019, comparison between controls and preclosure cases.
p < 0.001, comparison between preclosure and 48 hours.
p < 0.001, comparison between cases at 48 hours and 1 month.
p < 0.001, comparison between cases at 1 month and 6 months.
p = 0.005, comparison between controls and preclosure cases.
p = 0.001, comparison between controls and cases at 6 months.
Fig. 1Correlation between the measurements of pulmonary end of PDA by 2D echocardiography and angiography by Bland–Altman analysis. Angio = angiography; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus; Pul = pulmonary; SEE = standard error of the estimate; 2D = two dimensional.
Comparison of myocardial function by tissue Doppler velocities and myocardial performance index between cases at baseline and post-PDA closure, and controls.
| Controls ( | Cases | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preclosure ( | Postclosure | ||||
| 48 h ( | 1 mo ( | 6 mo ( | |||
| 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | |
| 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.068 ± 0.02 | 0.061 ± 0.02 | 0.069 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.071 ± 0.01 | 0.066 ± 0.01 | 0.067 ± 0.01 | 0.083 ± 0.2 | |
| 2.06 ± 0.74 | 1.84 ± 0.66 | 1.778 ± 0.77 | 1.702 ± 0.60 | 1.78 ± 0.66 | |
| 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.112 ± 0.02 | 0.108 ± 0.08 | 0.103 ± 0.03 | 0.107 ± 0.03 | |
| 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.049 ± 0.01 | 0.055 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | |
| 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.064 ± 0.01 | 0.060 ± 0.01 | 0.058 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | |
| 2.42 ± 1.03 | 2.090 ± 0.96 | 1.997 ± 0.72 | 1.999 ± 0.8 | 2.094 ± 0.8 | |
| MPI | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.06 |
A′ l = mitral peak late diastolic lateral annular velocity; A′ s = interventricular septum peak late diastolic velocity; E′ l = mitral peak early diastolic lateral annular velocity; E′ s = interventricular septum peak early diastolic velocity; l = lateral; MPI = myocardial performance index; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus; s = septal; S′ l = lateral annulus peak systolic velocity; S′ s = interventricular septal peak systolic velocity.
p < 0.001, comparison between preclosure and 48-hour measurement.
p < 0.001, comparison between 48-hour and 1-month measurements.
p < 0.001, comparison between 1-month and 6-month measurements.
p = 0.002, comparison between 48-hour and 1-month measurements.
p = 0.017, comparison between preclosure and 48-hour measurements.
p = 0.024, comparison between preclosure and 48-hour measurements.
p = 0.006, comparison between 48-hour and 1-month measurements.
p = 0.003, comparison between preclosure and 48-hour measurements.
p = 0.05, comparison between pre closure and 48-hour measurements.
Fig. 2(A) Changes in MPI before and after PDA closure. (B) ROC curve derived from the multivariable binary logistic regression model for prediction of the occurrence of significantly ( > 20%) prolonged MPI from preprocedure value. CI = confidence interval; MPI = myocardial performance index; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus; ROC = receiver-operating characteristic.
Comparison of patients with significantly ( > 20%) or insignificantly ( < 20%) prolonged MPI post-PDA closure.a
| Variables | Insignificantly ( < 20%) prolonged MPI ( | Significantly ( > 20%) prolonged MPI ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 2.0 (1.2–4.3) | 1.0 (0.8–2.5) | 0.058 |
| BSA (m2) | 0.59 (0.26) | 0.49 (0.22) | 0.243 |
| PDA diameter (mm) | 3.1 (0.9) | 3.4 (0.8) | 0.484 |
| ESPAP (mmHg) | 30.9 (14) | 35.8 (13.2) | 0.296 |
| LVEDD ( | 2.9 (1.4) | 3.0 (1.7) | 0.879 |
| Preclosure MPI | 0.36 (0.05) | 0.39 (0.03) | 0.041 |
| Preclosure GLS | −20.1 (8.0) | −23.8 (3.6) | 0.043 |
| GLS at 48 h | −19.3 (3.0) | −18.8 (2.4) | 0.633 |
| Percent change of GLS | −10.0 (7.2) | −20.2 (9.8) | 0.001 |
| Significant decrease of GLS ( > 20%) | 4 (13.8%) | 10 (76.9%) | 0.0001 |
BSA = body surface area; ESPAp = estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure; GLS = global longitudinal strain; LVEDD = left ventricular end diastolic diameter; MPI = myocardial performance index; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus; SD = standard deviation.
Data are presented as mean (SD) or number (%).
Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis for predictors of the occurrence of significantly prolonged MPI ( > 20%) from preprocedure value.
| Variable | Regression coefficient | SE | Odds ratio | 95% CI for odds ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | −0.32 | 0.22 | 0.133 | 0.72 | 0.47–1.10 |
| PDA diameter (mm) | 0.33 | 0.45 | 0.462 | 1.39 | 0.58–3.38 |
| LVEDD ( | −0.13 | 0.28 | 0.639 | 0.88 | 0.51–1.52 |
| Preprocedure GLS (%) | −0.25 | 0.13 | 0.049 | 0.78 | 0.61–0.999 |
| Model diagnostics | |||||
| −2 log likelihood test | |||||
| Area under ROC curve | 0.78 (95% CI, 0.63–0.89) | ||||
| Best cutoff criterion | Predicted probability > 0.238 | ||||
| Sensitivity (%) | 84.6 (95% CI, 54.6–98.1) | ||||
| Specificity (%) | 58.6 (95% CI, 38.9–76.5) | ||||
| Correct classification rate (%) | 78.6 | ||||
CI = confidence interval; GLS = global longitudinal strain; LVEDD = left ventricular end diastolic diameter; MPI = myocardial performance index; PDA = patent ductus arteriosus; ROC = receiver operating characteristics; SE = standard error.
Fig. 3Changes of global longitudinal strain of left ventricle at baseline and after PDA closure. PDA = patent ductus arteriosus.