Literature DB >> 21836482

Does neoadjuvant therapy alter KRAS and/or MSI results in rectal adenocarcinoma testing?

Sarah L Ondrejka1, David F Schaeffer, Maureen A Jakubowski, David A Owen, Mary P Bronner.   

Abstract

To our knowledge, the genotoxic effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy on molecular diagnostic testing results are unknown. However, if neoadjuvant treatments were to alter molecular test results, clinical decision-making could be misled. This raises questions about the appropriateness of using posttreatment tumor for testing. To address this, rectal adenocarcinomas both before and after neoadjuvant treatment were evaluated for alterations in KRAS and microsatellite instability (MSI) testing. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy is common in this tumor type, and alterations in these 2 tests would significantly impact management. A total of 17 rectal adenocarcinoma patients with available pretreatment and posttreatment tumor were studied. MSI testing used the revised National Cancer Institute panel of 5 mononucleotide microsatellite repeats, comparing cancers with matched normal control tissues. KRAS codon 12-point and 13-point mutations were examined by polymerase chain reaction amplification and bidirectional sequencing. MSI and KRAS results were unchanged comparing rectal cancer tissue before and after chemoradiotherapy in all 17 patients (P=1.000; 95% CI: 0.3969-2.520). All 17 tumors (100%) were microsatellite stable. KRAS testing identified 12 (72%) wild-type tumors and 5 (28%) codon 12 or 13 mutant tumors with identical KRAS point mutations before and after treatment. The identified MSI and KRAS mutational prevalences parallel those reported in the rectal cancer literature. Neoadjuvant therapy did not alter KRAS codon 12 or 13 or MSI results in rectal adenocarcinoma, providing evidence that either pretreatment biopsy or posttreatment resection tissues are appropriate for testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21836482     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182253800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  10 in total

1.  Tumor cellularity as a quality assurance measure for accurate clinical detection of BRAF mutations in melanoma.

Authors:  Jonathan C Dudley; Grzegorz T Gurda; Li-Hui Tseng; Derek A Anderson; Guoli Chen; Janis M Taube; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; Ming-Tseh Lin
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Expression Profile of Markers for Targeted Therapy in Gastric Cancer Patients: HER-2, Microsatellite Instability and PD-L1.

Authors:  Marina Alessandra Pereira; Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos; André Roncon Dias; Sheila Friedrich Faraj; Renan Ribeiro E Ribeiro; Tiago Biachi de Castria; Bruno Zilberstein; Venancio Avancini Ferreira Alves; Ulysses Ribeiro; Evandro Sobroza de Mello
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Nasoethmoidal Intestinal-Type Adenocarcinoma Treated with Cetuximab: Role of Liquid Biopsy and BEAMing in Predicting Response to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy.

Authors:  Santiago Cabezas-Camarero; Virginia de la Orden García; Vanesa García-Barberán; Beatriz Mediero-Valeros; Ahmad Issa Subhi-Issa; Patricia Llovet García; Inmaculada Bando-Polaino; Salomé Merino Menéndez; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-01-02

4.  Mutation in BRAF and SMAD4 associated with resistance to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Dan Jiang; Xin Wang; Yajian Wang; Dana Philips; Wenjian Meng; Moli Xiong; Junyi Zhao; Linyong Sun; Du He; Kun Li
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Endoscopic and surgical management of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rebeccah B Baucom; Paul E Wise
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-06

6.  KRAS mutation status is highly homogeneous between areas of the primary tumor and the corresponding metastasis of colorectal adenocarcinomas: one less problem in patient care.

Authors:  Mariana Petaccia de Macedo; Fernanda M Melo; Heber Salvador C Ribeiro; Marcio C Marques; Luciane T Kagohara; Maria Dirlei Begnami; Julio C Neto; Júlia S Ribeiro; Fernando A Soares; Dirce M Carraro; Isabela W Cunha
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 7.  The molecular basis of chemoradiosensitivity in rectal cancer: implications for personalized therapies.

Authors:  Marian Grade; Hendrik A Wolff; Jochen Gaedcke; B Michael Ghadimi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  RAS mutations vary between lesions in synchronous primary colorectal cancer: testing only one lesion is not sufficient to guide anti-EGFR treatment decisions.

Authors:  Mariana Petaccia de Macedo; Fernanda Machado de Melo; Júlia da Silva Ribeiro; Celso Abdon Lopes de Mello; Maria Dirlei Ferreira de Souza Begnami; Fernando Augusto Soares; Dirce Maria Carraro; Isabela Werneck da Cunha
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2015-02-09

9.  Heterogeneity of KRAS Mutation Status in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Peter Jo; Alexander König; Markus Schirmer; Julia Kitz; Lena-Christin Conradi; Azadeh Azizian; Markus Bernhardt; Hendrik A Wolff; Marian Grade; Michael Ghadimi; Philipp Ströbel; Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus; Jochen Gaedcke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Molecular Diagnostics for Precision Medicine in Colorectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Guoli Chen; Zhaohai Yang; James R Eshleman; George J Netto; Ming-Tseh Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.