Literature DB >> 28979066

Mitigating Bias in Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The Case for Bayesian Nonparametrics.

Joseph Antonelli1, Lorenzo Trippa2, Sebastien Haneuse3.   

Abstract

Generalized linear mixed models are a common statistical tool for the analysis of clustered or longitudinal data where correlation is accounted for through cluster-specific random effects. In practice, the distribution of the random effects is typically taken to be a Normal distribution, although if this does not hold then the model is misspecified and standard estimation/inference may be invalid. An alternative is to perform a so-called nonparametric Bayesian analyses in which one assigns a Dirichlet process (DP) prior to the unknown distribution of the random effects. In this paper we examine operating characteristics for estimation of fixed effects and random effects based on such an analysis under a range of "true" random effects distributions. As part of this we investigate various approaches for selection of the precision parameter of the DP prior. In addition, we illustrate the use of the methods with an analysis of post-operative complications among n = 18, 643 female Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a hysterectomy procedure at N = 503 hospitals in the US. Overall, we conclude that using the DP priori n modeling the random effect distribution results in large reductions of bias with little loss of efficiency. While no single choice for the precision parameter will be optimal in all settings, certain strategies such as importance sampling or empirical Bayes can be used to obtain reasonable results in a broad range of data scenarios.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dirichlet process prior; generalized linear mixed models; model misspecification; random effects

Year:  2016        PMID: 28979066      PMCID: PMC5624537          DOI: 10.1214/15-STS533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Sci        ISSN: 0883-4237            Impact factor:   2.901


  15 in total

1.  Linear mixed models with flexible distributions of random effects for longitudinal data.

Authors:  D Zhang; M Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Bayesian multivariate logistic regression.

Authors:  Sean M O'Brien; David B Dunson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Flexible Random Intercept Models for Binary Outcomes Using Mixtures of Normals.

Authors:  Brian Caffo; Ming-Wen An; Charles Rohde
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  The multivariate beta process and an extension of the Polya tree model.

Authors:  Lorenzo Trippa; Peter Müller; Wesley Johnson
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  A semiparametric Bayesian approach to the random effects model.

Authors:  K P Kleinman; J G Ibrahim
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Prediction of random effects in linear and generalized linear models under model misspecification.

Authors:  Charles E McCulloch; John M Neuhaus
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  DPpackage: Bayesian Non- and Semi-parametric Modelling in R.

Authors:  Alejandro Jara; Timothy E Hanson; Fernando A Quintana; Peter Müller; Gary L Rosner
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 6.440

9.  Assessing toxicities in a clinical trial: Bayesian inference for ordinal data nested within categories.

Authors:  L G Leon-Novelo; X Zhou; B Nebiyou Bekele; P Müller
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A Bayesian approach for joint modeling of cluster size and subunit-specific outcomes.

Authors:  David B Dunson; Zhen Chen; Jean Harry
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimation and inference for semi-competing risks based on data from a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Ina Jazić; Stephanie Lee; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  A Bayesian transition model for missing longitudinal binary outcomes and an application to a smoking cessation study.

Authors:  Li Li; Ji-Hyun Lee; Steven K Sutton; Vani N Simmons; Thomas H Brandon
Journal:  Stat Modelling       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.039

3.  Accelerated failure time models for semi-competing risks data in the presence of complex censoring.

Authors:  Kyu Ha Lee; Virginie Rondeau; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.571

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.