Literature DB >> 18628822

Flexible Random Intercept Models for Binary Outcomes Using Mixtures of Normals.

Brian Caffo1, Ming-Wen An, Charles Rohde.   

Abstract

Random intercept models for binary data are useful tools for addressing between-subject heterogeneity. Unlike linear models, the non-linearity of link functions used for binary data force a distinction between marginal and conditional interpretations. This distinction is blurred in probit models with a normally distributed random intercept because the resulting model implies a probit marginal link as well. That is, this model is closed in the sense that the distribution associated with the marginal and conditional link functions and the random effect distribution are all of the same family. It is shown that the closure property is also attained when the distributions associated with the conditional and marginal link functions and the random effect distribution are mixtures of normals. The resulting flexible family of models is demonstrated to be related to several others present in the literature and can be used to synthesize several seemingly disparate modeling approaches. In addition, this family of models offers considerable computational benefits. A diverse series of examples is explored that illustrates the wide applicability of this approach.

Year:  2007        PMID: 18628822      PMCID: PMC2031853          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  6 in total

1.  A general maximum likelihood analysis of variance components in generalized linear models.

Authors:  M Aitkin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Marginalized binary mixed-effects models with covariate-dependent random effects and likelihood inference.

Authors:  Zengri Wang; Thomas A Louis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Modelling binary data from a three-period cross-over trial.

Authors:  B Jones; M G Kenward
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang; P S Albert
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Selection of the valid number of sampling units and a consideration of their combination in toxicological studies involving reproduction, teratogenesis or carcinogenesis.

Authors:  C S Weil
Journal:  Food Cosmet Toxicol       Date:  1970-04

6.  On the use of the quasi-likelihood method in teratological experiments.

Authors:  K Y Liang; J Hanfelt
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.571

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Practical Marginalized Multilevel Models.

Authors:  Michael E Griswold; Bruce J Swihart; Brian S Caffo; Scott L Zeger
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2013

2.  A unifying framework for marginalized random intercept models of correlated binary outcomes.

Authors:  Bruce J Swihart; Brian S Caffo; Ciprian M Crainiceanu
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  A generalized linear mixed model for longitudinal binary data with a marginal logit link function.

Authors:  Michael Parzen; Souparno Ghosh; Stuart Lipsitz; Debajyoti Sinha; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Bani K Mallick; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Generalized Linear Mixed Models with Gaussian Mixture Random Effects: Inference and Application.

Authors:  Lanfeng Pan; Yehua Li; Kevin He; Yanming Li; Yi Li
Journal:  J Multivar Anal       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 1.473

5.  Joint modeling of survival time and longitudinal outcomes with flexible random effects.

Authors:  Jaeun Choi; Donglin Zeng; Andrew F Olshan; Jianwen Cai
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Empirically indistinguishable multidimensional IRT and locally dependent unidimensional item response models.

Authors:  Edward Haksing Ip
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Mitigating Bias in Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The Case for Bayesian Nonparametrics.

Authors:  Joseph Antonelli; Lorenzo Trippa; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.901

8.  Two-part models for repeatedly measured ordinal data with "don't know" category.

Authors:  Ralitza Gueorguieva; Eugenia Buta; Meghan Morean; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.373

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.