Literature DB >> 20528860

Prediction of random effects in linear and generalized linear models under model misspecification.

Charles E McCulloch1, John M Neuhaus.   

Abstract

Statistical models that include random effects are commonly used to analyze longitudinal and correlated data, often with the assumption that the random effects follow a Gaussian distribution. Via theoretical and numerical calculations and simulation, we investigate the impact of misspecification of this distribution on both how well the predicted values recover the true underlying distribution and the accuracy of prediction of the realized values of the random effects. We show that, although the predicted values can vary with the assumed distribution, the prediction accuracy, as measured by mean square error, is little affected for mild-to-moderate violations of the assumptions. Thus, standard approaches, readily available in statistical software, will often suffice. The results are illustrated using data from the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study using models to predict future blood pressure values.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20528860      PMCID: PMC3066692          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01435.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  Linear mixed models with flexible distributions of random effects for longitudinal data.

Authors:  D Zhang; M Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The use of fixed- and random-effects models for classifying hospitals as mortality outliers: a Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; David A Alter; Jack V Tu
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  The impact of a misspecified random-effects distribution on the estimation and the performance of inferential procedures in generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  S Litière; A Alonso; G Molenberghs
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Type I and Type II error under random-effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  Saskia Litière; Ariel Alonso; Geert Molenberghs
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Efficient estimation for patient-specific rates of disease progression using nonnormal linear mixed models.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Peter X-K Song; Annie Qu; Tom Greene
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  A note on type II error under random effects misspecification in generalized linear mixed models.

Authors:  John M Neuhaus; Charles E McCulloch; Ross Boylan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Impact of the choice of benchmark on the conclusions of hospital report cards.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; David A Alter; Geoffrey M Anderson; Jack V Tu
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs.

Authors:  William M Muir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

  8 in total
  24 in total

1.  A valid formulation of the analysis of noninferiority trials under random effects meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erica H Brittain; Michael P Fay; Dean A Follmann
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Robust Bayesian hierarchical model using normal/independent distributions.

Authors:  Geng Chen; Sheng Luo
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.207

3.  Novel methods for the analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Lee Kennedy-Shaffer; Victor de Gruttola; Marc Lipsitch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Reduced hierarchical models with application to estimating health effects of simultaneous exposure to multiple pollutants.

Authors:  Jennifer F Bobb; Francesca Dominici; Roger D Peng
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.864

5.  Frailty Models for Familial Risk with Application to Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Malka Gorfine; Li Hsu; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

6.  Bayesian modeling for genetic anticipation in presence of mutational heterogeneity: a case study in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Philip S Boonstra; Bhramar Mukherjee; Jeremy M G Taylor; Mef Nilbert; Victor Moreno; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Log-gamma linear-mixed effects models for multiple outcomes with application to a longitudinal glaucoma study.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Dandan Luo; Pengfei Li; Lucie Sharpsten; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 2.207

8.  A linear mixed model for predicting a binary event from longitudinal data under random effects misspecification.

Authors:  Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Zero-inflated count models for longitudinal measurements with heterogeneous random effects.

Authors:  Huirong Zhu; Sheng Luo; Stacia M DeSantis
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Joint analysis of longitudinal and survival data measured on nested timescales by using shared parameter models: an application to fecundity data.

Authors:  Alexander C McLain; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 1.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.