| Literature DB >> 28978930 |
Shigeru Kiryu1, Hiroyuki Akai2, Masanori Nojima3, Kiyoshi Hasegawa4, Hiroji Shinkawa4, Norihiro Kokudo4, Koichiro Yasaka2, Kuni Ohtomo5.
Abstract
We assessed the relationship between the heterogeneity of HCC on preoperative non-contrast-enhanced CT and patient prognosis. The heterogeneity of CT images from 122 patients was assessed and texture feature parameters such as mean, standard deviation (SD), entropy, mean of the positive pixels (MPP), skewness, and kurtosis were obtained using filtration. The relationship between CT texture features and 5-year overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independence of texture feature from clinical or pathological parameters. The Kaplan-Meier curves for OS or DFS was significantly different between patient groups dichotomized by cut-off values for all CT texture parameters with filtration at at least one filter level. Multivariate regression analysis showed the independence of most CT texture parameters on clinical and pathological parameters for OS with filtration at at least one filter level and without filtration except kurtosis. SD, entropy, and MPP with coarse filter, and skewness without filtration showed a significant correlation for DFS. CT texture features of non-contrast-enhanced CT images showed a relationship with HCC prognosis. Multivariate regression analysis showed the possibility of CT texture feature increase the prognostic prediction of HCC by clinical and pathological information.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28978930 PMCID: PMC5627280 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12688-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Patient’s background.
| Gender (male/female) | 92 (75.4%)/30 (24.5%) |
| Age (years) | 69.2 |
| HBs-Ag | 27 (22.1%) |
| HCV-Ab | 60 (49.2%) |
| Cirrhosis | 59 (48.4%) |
| Child-Pugh A/B | 106 (86.9%)/16 (13.1%) |
| AFP (ng/ml) >400/< = 400 | 22 (18.0%)/100 (82.0%) |
| Differentiation | |
| well/moderate/poor/necrosis | 26 (21.3%)/82 (67.2%) 10 (8.2%)/4 (3.3%) |
| TNM stage | |
| I/II/III/IVA/IVB | 12 (9.8%)/60 (49.2%)/35 (28.7%)/12 (9.8%)/3 (2.5%) |
| Tumor size (cm) | 7.1 |
| Tumor number 1/2/>3 | 77 (63.1%)/24 (19.7%)/21 (17.2%) |
| Venous invasion | 38 (31.1%) |
| Preoperative TACE cases | 37 (30.3%) |
Values are presented as number,or number (%).
Figure 1Texture analysis of computed tomography (CT) images of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (a) Preoperative non-contrast-enhanced CT image obtained before hepatic resection shows a region of interest drawn around the periphery of the HCC. A corresponding post-processed CT image displays (b) fine, (c) medium, and (d) coarse textures obtained at fine (2 mm wide), medium (4 mm wide), and coarse (6 mm wide) filtration, respectively. The images are displayed using a red or blue color scale showing negative or positive pixels respectively.
Results of Kaplan-Meier analysis for overall survival and disease-free survival.
| Texture parameters and filter levels | Overall survival | Disease-free survival | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log-rank test | Likelihood ratio test | Log-rank test | Likelihood ratio test | |||
| Threshold Value |
|
| Threshold Value |
|
| |
| Mean | ||||||
| no filtration | 51.2 | 0.057 |
| 49.76 | 0.135 | 0.247 |
| 2 (fine) | −0.71 |
|
| 0.77 | 0.017 | 0.062 |
| 4 (medium) | −1.59 | 0.098 |
| −11.68 | 0.111 | 0.054 |
| 6 (coarse) | −11.48 | 0.157 | 0.122 | −22.35 | 0.084 | 0.053 |
| SD | ||||||
| no filtration | 12.99 | < | < | 14.53 | 0.360 | 0.620 |
| 2 (fine) | 18.05 |
|
| 24.88 | 0.250 | 0.131 |
| 4 (medium) | 17.13 | < | < | 9.30 | 0.183 | 0.402 |
| 6 (coarse) | 22.66 |
|
| 12.75 |
|
|
| Entropy | ||||||
| no filtration | 4.01 | < |
| 4.03 | 0.130 | 0.448 |
| 2 (fine) | 4.26 |
|
| 4.27 | 0.270 | 0.381 |
| 4 (medium) | 4.22 | < |
| 4.33 | 0.117 | 0.243 |
| 6 (coarse) | 4.49 | < | < | 4.53 |
|
|
| MPP | ||||||
| no filtration | 51.2 | 0.057 |
| 49.76 | 0.135 | 0.247 |
| 2 (fine) | 15.15 |
|
| 12.39 | 0.192 | 0.349 |
| 4 (medium) | 16.21 |
| < | 5.51 | 0.091 | 0.111 |
| 6 (coarse) | 17.18 |
|
| 2.17 |
|
|
| Skewness | ||||||
| no filtration | −0.13 |
|
| −0.13 |
|
|
| 2 (fine) | −0.11 | 0.119 | 0.111 | −0.11 |
| 0.071 |
| 4 (medium) | −0.04 |
|
| 0.18 |
| 0.077 |
| 6 (coarse) | −1.47 | 0.097 | 0.237 | 0.69 | 0.071 | 0.093 |
| Kurtosis | ||||||
| no filtration | 0.20 | 0.112 | 0.179 | −0.13 |
|
|
| 2 (fine) | 0.61 |
| 0.027 | 0.61 |
| 0.058 |
| 4 (medium) | −0.02 |
| 0.138 | −0.21 | 0.177 | 0.475 |
| 6 (coarse) | 1.38 | 0.162 | 0.287 | 1.37 |
|
|
SD, standard deviation; MPP, mean of the positive pixels.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival at fine filtration (a) and disease-free survival for kurtosis at coarse filtration (b).
Results of correlations between CT texture features and clinical parameters.
| Texture parameters and filter levels | HBs-Ag | HCV-Ab, | Child-Pugh classification | HCC differentiation | TNM stage | AFP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-value of paired-t-test | Spearman’s correlation coefficient | Pearson correlation coefficient | ||||
| Mean | ||||||
| no filtration | 0.41 | 0.23 | −0.01 | −0.14 | −0.13 | −0.06 |
| 2 (fine) | 0.59 | 0.41 | 0.01 | −0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 4 (medium) | 0.73 | 0.83 | 0.04 | −0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| 6 (coarse) | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.07 | −0.05 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| SD | ||||||
| no filtration | 0.50 | 0.73 | −0.01 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.07 |
| 2 (fine) | 0.73 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.03 |
| 4 (medium) | 0.58 | 0.24 | 0.05 | −0.06 | −0.03 | −0.02 |
| 6 (coarse) | 0.41 | 0.12 | 0.03 | −0.17 | −0.10 | −0.04 |
| Entropy | ||||||
| no filtration | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| 2 (fine) | 0.44 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.15 |
| 4 (medium) | 0.74 | 0.11 | 0.07 | −0.03 | −0.03 | 0.07 |
| 6 (coarse) | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.06 | −0.15 | −0.09 | 0.05 |
| MPP | ||||||
| no filtration | 0.45 | 0.27 | −0.01 | −0.14 | −0.13 | −0.07 |
| 2 (fine) | 0.58 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.08 |
| 4 (medium) | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.13 | −0.06 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
| 6 (coarse) | 0.45 | 0.57 | 0.04 | −0.08 | −0.03 | −0.03 |
| Skewness | ||||||
| no filtration | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.03 |
| 2 (fine) | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.02 | −0.03 | 0.07 | −0.04 |
| 4 (medium) | 0.90 | 0.46 | 0.04 | −0.04 | 0.03 | −0.04 |
| 6 (coarse) | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.03 | −0.01 | −0.03 | −0.10 |
| Kurtosis | ||||||
| no filtration | 0.37 | 0.66 | −0.12 | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.02 |
| 2 (fine) | 0.54 | 0.43 | −0.07 | −0.06 | 0.03 | −0.03 |
| 4 (medium) | 0.98 | 0.46 | −0.04 | −0.06 | −0.13 | 0.05 |
| 6 (coarse) | 0.94 | 0.18 | −0.08 | 0.00 | −0.12 | 0.05 |
Figure 3Correlation of each texture feature parameter.