Literature DB >> 28976721

Automatic cellularity assessment from post-treated breast surgical specimens.

Mohammad Peikari1, Sherine Salama2, Sharon Nofech-Mozes2, Anne L Martel1,3.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) of breast cancer (BCa) is an option for patients with the locally advanced disease. It has been compared with standard adjuvant therapy with the aim of improving prognosis and surgical outcome. Moreover, the response of the tumor to the therapy provides useful information for patient management. The pathological examination of the tissue sections after surgery is the gold-standard to estimate the residual tumor and the assessment of cellularity is an important component of tumor burden assessment. In the current clinical practice, tumor cellularity is manually estimated by pathologists on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides, the quality, and reliability of which might be impaired by inter-observer variability which potentially affects prognostic power assessment in NAT trials. This procedure is also qualitative and time-consuming. In this paper, we describe a method of automatically assessing cellularity. A pipeline to automatically segment nuclei figures and estimate residual cancer cellularity from within patches and whole slide images (WSIs) of BCa was developed. We have compared the performance of our proposed pipeline in estimating residual cancer cellularity with that of two expert pathologists. We found an intra-class agreement coefficient (ICC) of 0.89 (95% CI of [0.70, 0.95]) between pathologists, 0.74 (95% CI of [0.70, 0.77]) between pathologist #1 and proposed method, and 0.75 (95% CI of [0.71, 0.79]) between pathologist #2 and proposed method. We have also successfully applied our proposed technique on a WSI to locate areas with high concentration of residual cancer. The main advantage of our approach is that it is fully automatic and can be used to find areas with high cellularity in WSIs. This provides a first step in developing an automatic technique for post-NAT tumor response assessment from pathology slides.
© 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; machine learning; neoadjuvant therapy; pathology image analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28976721      PMCID: PMC6124665          DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  46 in total

1.  Defining the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Anne F Schott; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Unsupervised segmentation of overlapped nuclei using Bayesian classification.

Authors:  Chanho Jung; Changick Kim; Seoung Wan Chae; Sukjoong Oh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Accuracy of physical examination, ultrasonography, and mammography in predicting residual pathologic tumor size in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Anees B Chagpar; Lavinia P Middleton; Aysegul A Sahin; Peter Dempsey; Aman U Buzdar; Attiqa N Mirza; Fredrick C Ames; Gildy V Babiera; Barry W Feig; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Segmentation of clustered nuclei with shape markers and marking function.

Authors:  Jierong Cheng; Jagath C Rajapakse
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Reproducibility of residual cancer burden for prognostic assessment of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Florentia Peintinger; Bruno Sinn; Christos Hatzis; Constance Albarracin; Erinn Downs-Kelly; Jerzy Morkowski; Rebekah Gould; W Fraser Symmans
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Residual tumor (R) classification and prognosis.

Authors:  P Hermanek; C Wittekind
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb

7.  Assessment of cellularity in bone marrow fragments.

Authors:  A N Al-Adhadh; I Cavill
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Pathology of breast carcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: an overview with recommendations on specimen processing and reporting.

Authors:  Sunati Sahoo; Susan C Lester
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Large-scale computations on histology images reveal grade-differentiating parameters for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sokol Petushi; Fernando U Garcia; Marian M Haber; Constantine Katsinis; Aydin Tozeren
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 10.  Pathologic Evaluation of Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Cheol Keun Park; Woo-Hee Jung; Ja Seung Koo
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2016-04-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  A Cluster-then-label Semi-supervised Learning Approach for Pathology Image Classification.

Authors:  Mohammad Peikari; Sherine Salama; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Anne L Martel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Automated and Manual Quantification of Tumour Cellularity in Digital Slides for Tumour Burden Assessment.

Authors:  Shazia Akbar; Mohammad Peikari; Sherine Salama; Azadeh Yazdan Panah; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Anne L Martel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Human-interpretable image features derived from densely mapped cancer pathology slides predict diverse molecular phenotypes.

Authors:  James A Diao; Jason K Wang; Wan Fung Chui; Andrew H Beck; Hunter L Elliott; Amaro Taylor-Weiner; Victoria Mountain; Sai Chowdary Gullapally; Ramprakash Srinivasan; Richard N Mitchell; Benjamin Glass; Sara Hoffman; Sudha K Rao; Chirag Maheshwari; Abhik Lahiri; Aaditya Prakash; Ryan McLoughlin; Jennifer K Kerner; Murray B Resnick; Michael C Montalto; Aditya Khosla; Ilan N Wapinski
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  SPIE-AAPM-NCI BreastPathQ challenge: an image analysis challenge for quantitative tumor cellularity assessment in breast cancer histology images following neoadjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Nicholas Petrick; Shazia Akbar; Kenny H Cha; Sharon Nofech-Mozes; Berkman Sahiner; Marios A Gavrielides; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Karen Drukker; Anne L Martel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-05-08

5.  Integrative multiomics-histopathology analysis for breast cancer classification.

Authors:  Yasha Ektefaie; William Yuan; Deborah A Dillon; Nancy U Lin; Jeffrey A Golden; Isaac S Kohane; Kun-Hsing Yu
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-11-29

6.  Deep Neural Network Analysis of Pathology Images With Integrated Molecular Data for Enhanced Glioma Classification and Grading.

Authors:  Linmin Pei; Karra A Jones; Zeina A Shboul; James Y Chen; Khan M Iftekharuddin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.