Literature DB >> 28976646

Untangling cell tracks: Quantifying cell migration by time lapse image data analysis.

Carl-Magnus Svensson1, Anna Medyukhina1, Ivan Belyaev1,2, Naim Al-Zaben1,2, Marc Thilo Figge1,2.   

Abstract

Automated microscopy has given researchers access to great amounts of live cell imaging data from in vitro and in vivo experiments. Much focus has been put on extracting cell tracks from such data using a plethora of segmentation and tracking algorithms, but further analysis is normally required to draw biologically relevant conclusions. Such relevant conclusions may be whether the migration is directed or not, whether the population has homogeneous or heterogeneous migration patterns. This review focuses on the analysis of cell migration data that are extracted from time lapse images. We discuss a range of measures and models used to analyze cell tracks independent of the biological system or the way the tracks were obtained. For single-cell migration, we focus on measures and models giving examples of biological systems where they have been applied, for example, migration of bacteria, fibroblasts, and immune cells. For collective migration, we describe the model systems wound healing, neural crest migration, and Drosophila gastrulation and discuss methods for cell migration within these systems. We also discuss the role of the extracellular matrix and subsequent differences between track analysis in vitro and in vivo. Besides methods and measures, we are putting special focus on the need for openly available data and code, as well as a lack of common vocabulary in cell track analysis.
© 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry. © 2017 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Keywords:  biomedical image processing; cell migration: track analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28976646     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  18 in total

1.  Hyperparameter optimization for image analysis: application to prostate tissue images and live cell data of virus-infected cells.

Authors:  Christian Ritter; Thomas Wollmann; Patrick Bernhard; Manuel Gunkel; Delia M Braun; Ji-Young Lee; Jan Meiners; Ronald Simon; Guido Sauter; Holger Erfle; Karsten Rippe; Ralf Bartenschlager; Karl Rohr
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Consensus guidelines for the use and interpretation of angiogenesis assays.

Authors:  Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Kari Alitalo; Elizabeth Allen; Andrey Anisimov; Alfred C Aplin; Robert Auerbach; Hellmut G Augustin; David O Bates; Judy R van Beijnum; R Hugh F Bender; Gabriele Bergers; Andreas Bikfalvi; Joyce Bischoff; Barbara C Böck; Peter C Brooks; Federico Bussolino; Bertan Cakir; Peter Carmeliet; Daniel Castranova; Anca M Cimpean; Ondine Cleaver; George Coukos; George E Davis; Michele De Palma; Anna Dimberg; Ruud P M Dings; Valentin Djonov; Andrew C Dudley; Neil P Dufton; Sarah-Maria Fendt; Napoleone Ferrara; Marcus Fruttiger; Dai Fukumura; Bart Ghesquière; Yan Gong; Robert J Griffin; Adrian L Harris; Christopher C W Hughes; Nan W Hultgren; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe; Melita Irving; Rakesh K Jain; Raghu Kalluri; Joanna Kalucka; Robert S Kerbel; Jan Kitajewski; Ingeborg Klaassen; Hynda K Kleinmann; Pieter Koolwijk; Elisabeth Kuczynski; Brenda R Kwak; Koen Marien; Juan M Melero-Martin; Lance L Munn; Roberto F Nicosia; Agnes Noel; Jussi Nurro; Anna-Karin Olsson; Tatiana V Petrova; Kristian Pietras; Roberto Pili; Jeffrey W Pollard; Mark J Post; Paul H A Quax; Gabriel A Rabinovich; Marius Raica; Anna M Randi; Domenico Ribatti; Curzio Ruegg; Reinier O Schlingemann; Stefan Schulte-Merker; Lois E H Smith; Jonathan W Song; Steven A Stacker; Jimmy Stalin; Amber N Stratman; Maureen Van de Velde; Victor W M van Hinsbergh; Peter B Vermeulen; Johannes Waltenberger; Brant M Weinstein; Hong Xin; Bahar Yetkin-Arik; Seppo Yla-Herttuala; Mervin C Yoder; Arjan W Griffioen
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 9.596

3.  Interplay Between the Persistent Random Walk and the Contact Inhibition of Locomotion Leads to Collective Cell Behaviors.

Authors:  Abdel-Rahman Hassan; Thomas Biel; David M Umulis; Taeyoon Kim
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Discovery and Development of Tumor Angiogenesis Assays.

Authors:  Gianfranco Natale; Guido Bocci
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2023

5.  Cells use molecular working memory to navigate in changing chemoattractant fields.

Authors:  Akhilesh Nandan; Abhishek Das; Robert Lott; Aneta Koseska
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Label-free monitoring of spatiotemporal changes in the stem cell cytoskeletons in time-lapse phase-contrast microscopy.

Authors:  Ching-Fen Jiang; Yu-Man Sun
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Detection and characterization of chemotaxis without cell tracking.

Authors:  Jack D Hywood; Gregory Rice; Sophie V Pageon; Mark N Read; Maté Biro
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Isolation and Time-Lapse Imaging of Primary Mouse Embryonic Palatal Mesenchyme Cells to Analyze Collective Movement Attributes.

Authors:  Jeremy P Goering; Dona Greta Isai; Andras Czirok; Irfan Saadi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 9.  Cell Tracking for Organoids: Lessons From Developmental Biology.

Authors:  Max A Betjes; Xuan Zheng; Rutger N U Kok; Jeroen S van Zon; Sander J Tans
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  Stochastic Methods for Inferring States of Cell Migration.

Authors:  R J Allen; C Welch; Neha Pankow; Klaus M Hahn; Timothy C Elston
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.