Christian Ritter1, Thomas Wollmann2, Patrick Bernhard2, Manuel Gunkel3, Delia M Braun4, Ji-Young Lee5,6, Jan Meiners7, Ronald Simon7, Guido Sauter7, Holger Erfle3, Karsten Rippe4, Ralf Bartenschlager5,6, Karl Rohr2. 1. Biomedical Computer Vision Group, BioQuant, IPMB, University of Heidelberg and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, Heidelberg, Germany. christian.ritter@bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de. 2. Biomedical Computer Vision Group, BioQuant, IPMB, University of Heidelberg and DKFZ, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. High-Content Analysis of the Cell (HiCell) and Advanced Biological Screening Facility, BioQuant, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. Division of Chromatin Networks, DKFZ and BioQuant, Im Neuenheimer Feld 267, Heidelberg, Germany. 5. Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 344, Heidelberg, Germany. 6. German Center of Infection Research, Heidelberg Partner Site, Heidelberg, Germany. 7. Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, Hamburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Automated analysis of microscopy image data typically requires complex pipelines that involve multiple methods for different image analysis tasks. To achieve best results of the analysis pipelines, method-dependent hyperparameters need to be optimized. However, complex pipelines often suffer from the fact that calculation of the gradient of the loss function is analytically or computationally infeasible. Therefore, first- or higher-order optimization methods cannot be applied. METHODS: We developed a new framework for zero-order black-box hyperparameter optimization called HyperHyper, which has a modular architecture that separates hyperparameter sampling and optimization. We also developed a visualization of the loss function based on infimum projection to obtain further insights into the optimization problem. RESULTS: We applied HyperHyper in three different experiments with different imaging modalities, and evaluated in total more than 400.000 hyperparameter combinations. HyperHyper was used for optimizing two pipelines for cell nuclei segmentation in prostate tissue microscopy images and two pipelines for detection of hepatitis C virus proteins in live cell microscopy data. We evaluated the impact of separating the sampling and optimization strategy using different optimizers and employed an infimum projection for visualizing the hyperparameter space. CONCLUSIONS: The separation of sampling and optimization strategy of the proposed HyperHyper optimization framework improves the result of the investigated image analysis pipelines. Visualization of the loss function based on infimum projection enables gaining further insights on the optimization process.
PURPOSE: Automated analysis of microscopy image data typically requires complex pipelines that involve multiple methods for different image analysis tasks. To achieve best results of the analysis pipelines, method-dependent hyperparameters need to be optimized. However, complex pipelines often suffer from the fact that calculation of the gradient of the loss function is analytically or computationally infeasible. Therefore, first- or higher-order optimization methods cannot be applied. METHODS: We developed a new framework for zero-order black-box hyperparameter optimization called HyperHyper, which has a modular architecture that separates hyperparameter sampling and optimization. We also developed a visualization of the loss function based on infimum projection to obtain further insights into the optimization problem. RESULTS: We applied HyperHyper in three different experiments with different imaging modalities, and evaluated in total more than 400.000 hyperparameter combinations. HyperHyper was used for optimizing two pipelines for cell nuclei segmentation in prostate tissue microscopy images and two pipelines for detection of hepatitis C virus proteins in live cell microscopy data. We evaluated the impact of separating the sampling and optimization strategy using different optimizers and employed an infimum projection for visualizing the hyperparameter space. CONCLUSIONS: The separation of sampling and optimization strategy of the proposed HyperHyper optimization framework improves the result of the investigated image analysis pipelines. Visualization of the loss function based on infimum projection enables gaining further insights on the optimization process.
Authors: William J Godinez; Marko Lampe; Peter Koch; Roland Eils; Barbara Müller; Karl Rohr Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Daniel Sage; Franck R Neumann; Florence Hediger; Susan M Gasser; Michael Unser Journal: IEEE Trans Image Process Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 10.856
Authors: Paolo Di Tommaso; Maria Chatzou; Evan W Floden; Pablo Prieto Barja; Emilio Palumbo; Cedric Notredame Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Carl-Magnus Svensson; Anna Medyukhina; Ivan Belyaev; Naim Al-Zaben; Marc Thilo Figge Journal: Cytometry A Date: 2017-10-04 Impact factor: 4.355
Authors: Nicolas Chenouard; Ihor Smal; Fabrice de Chaumont; Martin Maška; Ivo F Sbalzarini; Yuanhao Gong; Janick Cardinale; Craig Carthel; Stefano Coraluppi; Mark Winter; Andrew R Cohen; William J Godinez; Karl Rohr; Yannis Kalaidzidis; Liang Liang; James Duncan; Hongying Shen; Yingke Xu; Klas E G Magnusson; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Perrine Paul-Gilloteaux; Philippe Roudot; Charles Kervrann; François Waharte; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Spencer L Shorte; Joost Willemse; Katherine Celler; Gilles P van Wezel; Han-Wei Dan; Yuh-Show Tsai; Carlos Ortiz de Solórzano; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin; Erik Meijering Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2014-01-19 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Vladimír Ulman; Martin Maška; Klas E G Magnusson; Olaf Ronneberger; Carsten Haubold; Nathalie Harder; Pavel Matula; Petr Matula; David Svoboda; Miroslav Radojevic; Ihor Smal; Karl Rohr; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Oleh Dzyubachyk; Boudewijn Lelieveldt; Pengdong Xiao; Yuexiang Li; Siu-Yeung Cho; Alexandre C Dufour; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin; Constantino C Reyes-Aldasoro; Jose A Solis-Lemus; Robert Bensch; Thomas Brox; Johannes Stegmaier; Ralf Mikut; Steffen Wolf; Fred A Hamprecht; Tiago Esteves; Pedro Quelhas; Ömer Demirel; Lars Malmström; Florian Jug; Pavel Tomancak; Erik Meijering; Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia; Michal Kozubek; Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Enis Afgan; Dannon Baker; Bérénice Batut; Marius van den Beek; Dave Bouvier; Martin Cech; John Chilton; Dave Clements; Nate Coraor; Björn A Grüning; Aysam Guerler; Jennifer Hillman-Jackson; Saskia Hiltemann; Vahid Jalili; Helena Rasche; Nicola Soranzo; Jeremy Goecks; James Taylor; Anton Nekrutenko; Daniel Blankenberg Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 16.971