Literature DB >> 2897627

Bedside diagnosis of systolic murmurs.

N J Lembo1, L J Dell'Italia, M H Crawford, R A O'Rourke.   

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of bedside maneuvers in the evaluation of patients with systolic murmurs has not been assessed objectively. Therefore, we evaluated 50 patients with documented systolic murmurs and compared all standard bedside techniques. Murmurs originating within the right-sided chambers of the heart were best differentiated from all other murmurs by augmentation of their intensity with inspiration (100 percent sensitivity, 88 percent specificity) and diminution of their intensity with expiration (100 percent sensitivity, 88 percent specificity). The murmur of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was distinguished from all other murmurs by an increase in intensity with the Valsalva maneuver (65 percent sensitivity, 96 percent specificity) and during squatting-to-standing action (95 percent sensitivity, 84 percent specificity), and by a decrease in intensity during standing-to-squatting action (95 percent sensitivity, 85 percent specificity), passive leg elevation (85 percent sensitivity, 91 percent specificity), and handgrip (85 percent sensitivity, 75 percent specificity). The murmurs of mitral regurgitation and ventricular septal defect had parallel responses to all maneuvers, but could be differentiated from other systolic murmurs by augmentation of their intensity with handgrip (68 percent sensitivity, 92 percent specificity) and during transient arterial occlusion (78 percent sensitivity, 100 percent specificity), and by a decrease in their intensity during the inhalation of amyl nitrite (80 percent sensitivity, 90 percent specificity). No single maneuver identified the murmur of aortic stenosis, but the diagnosis could be made by exclusion. Although no single maneuver is 100 percent accurate in diagnosing the cause of a systolic murmur, its origin can be determined accurately at the bedside by observation of the response to a combination of maneuvers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2897627     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198806163182404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  8 in total

1.  Antonio Maria Valsalva (1666 - 1723).

Authors:  Steven H Yale
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-02

Review 2.  Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review.

Authors:  F T Fitzgerald
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-04

3.  A bedside clinical prediction rule for detecting moderate or severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  E Etchells; V Glenns; S Shadowitz; C Bell; S Siu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Cylinder mania in valvulopathy back to the future.

Authors:  Max Grinberg
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  A systolic murmur is a common presentation of aortic regurgitation detected by echocardiography.

Authors:  Paul A Heidenreich; Ingela Schnittger; Steven L Hancock; J Edwin Atwood
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 6.  Clinical examination: still a tool for our times?

Authors:  Jack Ende; Kevin M Fosnocht
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2002

7.  Estimating pressure gradients by auscultation: How technology (echocardiography) can help improve clinical skills.

Authors:  Rohini L Kadle; Colin K L Phoon
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-26

8.  Junior doctor skill in the art of physical examination: a retrospective study of the medical admission note over four decades.

Authors:  Charlotte M Oliver; Selena A Hunter; Takayoshi Ikeda; Duncan C Galletly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.