Literature DB >> 28975305

Effect of a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention on Blood Pressure Control in Low-Income Patients in Argentina: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jiang He1,2,3, Vilma Irazola4, Katherine T Mills1,2, Rosana Poggio4, Andrea Beratarrechea4, Jacquelyn Dolan1, Chung-Shiuan Chen1,2, Luz Gibbons4, Marie Krousel-Wood1,2,3, Lydia A Bazzano1,2, Analia Nejamis4, Pablo Gulayin4, Marilina Santero4, Federico Augustovski4, Jing Chen1,2,3, Adolfo Rubinstein4.   

Abstract

Importance: Despite extensive knowledge of hypertension treatment, the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension is high and increasing in low- and middle-income countries. Objective: To test whether a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention would improve blood pressure (BP) control among low-income patients with hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cluster randomized trial was conducted in 18 centers for primary health care within a national public system providing free medications and health care to uninsured patients in Argentina. A total of 1432 low-income adult patients with uncontrolled hypertension were recruited between June 2013 and April 2015 and followed up to October 2016. Interventions: Nine centers (743 patients) were randomized to the multicomponent intervention, which included a community health worker-led home intervention (health coaching, home BP monitoring, and BP audit and feedback), a physician intervention, and a text-messaging intervention over 18 months. Nine centers (689 patients) were randomized to usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary outcomes were the differences in systolic and diastolic BP changes from baseline to the end of follow-up of patients with hypertension. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients with controlled hypertension (BP <140/90 mm Hg). Three BP measurements were obtained at each of 2 baseline and 2 termination visits using a standard protocol, the means of which were used for analyses.
Results: Of 1432 participants (mean age, 55.8 years [SD, 13.3]; 772 women [53.0%]), 1357 (94.8%) completed the trial. Baseline mean systolic BP was 151.7 mm Hg for the intervention group and 149.8 mm Hg for the usual care group; the mean diastolic BP was 92.2 mm Hg for the intervention group and 90.1 mm Hg for the usual care group. Systolic BP reduction from baseline to month 18 was 19.3 mm Hg (95% CI, 17.9-20.8 mm Hg) for the intervention group and 12.7 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.3-14.2 mm Hg) for the usual care group; the difference in the reduction was 6.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.6-8.6; P < .001). Diastolic BP decreased by 12.2 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.2-13.2 mm Hg) in the intervention group and 6.9 mm Hg (95% CI, 5.9-7.8 mm Hg) in the control group; the difference in the reduction was 5.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.0-6.8 mm Hg; P < .001). The proportion of patients with controlled hypertension increased from 17.0% at baseline to 72.9% at 18 months in the intervention group and from 17.6% to 52.2% in the usual care group; the difference in the increase was 20.6% (95% CI, 15.4%-25.9%; P < .001). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: Low-income patients in Argentina with uncontrolled hypertension who participated in a community health worker-led multicomponent intervention experienced a greater decrease in systolic and diastolic BP than did patients who received usual care over 18 months. Further research is needed to assess generalizability and cost-effectiveness of this intervention and to understand which components may have contributed most to the outcome. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01834131.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28975305      PMCID: PMC5761321          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.11358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  31 in total

Review 1.  Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation.

Authors:  A H Briggs; D E Wonderling; C Z Mooney
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  The DASH Diet, 20 Years Later.

Authors:  Dori Steinberg; Gary G Bennett; Laura Svetkey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of community intervention trials.

Authors:  A Donner; N Klar
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dena Ettehad; Connor A Emdin; Amit Kiran; Simon G Anderson; Thomas Callender; Jonathan Emberson; John Chalmers; Anthony Rodgers; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Liam G Glynn; Andrew W Murphy; Susan M Smith; Knut Schroeder; Tom Fahey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

6.  Multicenter cluster-randomized trial of a multifactorial intervention to improve antihypertensive medication adherence and blood pressure control among patients at high cardiovascular risk (the COM99 study).

Authors:  Manel Pladevall; Carlos Brotons; Rafael Gabriel; Anna Arnau; Carmen Suarez; Mariano de la Figuera; Emilio Marquez; Antonio Coca; Javier Sobrino; George Divine; Michele Heisler; L Keoki Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Global Disparities of Hypertension Prevalence and Control: A Systematic Analysis of Population-Based Studies From 90 Countries.

Authors:  Katherine T Mills; Joshua D Bundy; Tanika N Kelly; Jennifer E Reed; Patricia M Kearney; Kristi Reynolds; Jing Chen; Jiang He
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans: an AHA scientific statement from the Council on High Blood Pressure Research Professional and Public Education Subcommittee.

Authors:  Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John W Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel H Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Lindsay F P Smith; Rod S Taylor; John L Campbell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-23

10.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Low-Cost Essential Antihypertensive Medicines for Hypertension Control in China: A Modelling Study.

Authors:  Dongfeng Gu; Jiang He; Pamela G Coxson; Petra W Rasmussen; Chen Huang; Anusorn Thanataveerat; Keane Y Tzong; Juyang Xiong; Miao Wang; Dong Zhao; Lee Goldman; Andrew E Moran
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  56 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Approach for Hypertension Control in Low-Income Settings in Argentina: Trial-Based Analysis of the Hypertension Control Program in Argentina.

Authors:  Federico Augustovski; Martín Chaparro; Alfredo Palacios; Lizheng Shi; Andrea Beratarrechea; Vilma Irazola; Adolfo Rubinstein; Katherine Mills; Jiang He; Andrés Pichon Riviere
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Stakeholder Engagement in the Translation of a Hypertension Control Program to Guatemala's Public Primary Health Care System: Lessons Learned, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Authors:  Meredith P Fort; Alejandra Paniagua-Avila; Andrea Beratarrechea; Sayra Cardona; Juan Carlos Figueroa; Kevin Martinez-Folgar; Daniela Moyano; Edgar Barrios; Bernardo Eliu Mazariegos; Eduardo Palacios; Vilma Irazola; Jiang He; Manuel Ramirez-Zea
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2019-06

3.  The distinctive roles of urban community health workers in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Teralynn Ludwick; Alison Morgan; Sumit Kane; Margaret Kelaher; Barbara McPake
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 4.  Prevention and Control of Hypertension: JACC Health Promotion Series.

Authors:  Robert M Carey; Paul Muntner; Hayden B Bosworth; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Cluster Randomized Trial for Hypertension Control: Effect on Lifestyles and Body Weight.

Authors:  Rosana Poggio; Santiago E Melendi; Andrea Beratarrechea; Luz Gibbons; Katherine T Mills; Chung-Shiuan Chen; Analía Nejamis; Pablo Gulayin; Marilina Santero; Jing Chen; Adolfo Rubinstein; Jiang He; Vilma Irazola
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 6.  Therapeutic Inertia and Treatment Intensification.

Authors:  Robina Josiah Willock; Joseph B Miller; Michelle Mohyi; Ahmed Abuzaanona; Meri Muminovic; Phillip D Levy
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Compendium of Health and Wellness Coaching: 2019 Addendum.

Authors:  Gary A Sforzo; Miranda P Kaye; Sebastian Harenberg; Kyle Costello; Laura Cobus-Kuo; Erica Rauff; Joel S Edman; Elizabeth Frates; Margaret Moore
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2019-05-26

Review 8.  Hypertension in Developing Countries: A Major Challenge for the Future.

Authors:  M Mohsen Ibrahim
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 9.  The global epidemiology of hypertension.

Authors:  Katherine T Mills; Andrei Stefanescu; Jiang He
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 28.314

10.  Hypertension control in Argentina, in the middle of a long road.

Authors:  Horacio A Carbajal; Martin R Salazar
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.