Literature DB >> 28973955

Phenotypic variation explains food web structural patterns.

Jean P Gibert1, John P DeLong2.   

Abstract

Food webs (i.e., networks of species and their feeding interactions) share multiple structural features across ecosystems. The factors explaining such similarities are still debated, and the role played by most organismal traits and their intraspecific variation is unknown. Here, we assess how variation in traits controlling predator-prey interactions (e.g., body size) affects food web structure. We show that larger phenotypic variation increases connectivity among predators and their prey as well as total food intake rate. For predators able to eat only a few species (i.e., specialists), low phenotypic variation maximizes intake rates, while the opposite is true for consumers with broader diets (i.e., generalists). We also show that variation sets predator trophic level by determining interaction strengths with prey at different trophic levels. Merging these results, we make two general predictions about the structure of food webs: (i) trophic level should increase with predator connectivity, and (ii) interaction strengths should decrease with prey trophic level. We confirm these predictions empirically using a global dataset of well-resolved food webs. Our results provide understanding of the processes structuring food webs that include functional traits and their naturally occurring variation. Published under the PNAS license.

Keywords:  complex networks; consumer–resource interactions; food webs; individual variability; intraspecific variability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28973955      PMCID: PMC5651739          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703864114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  34 in total

1.  Simple rules yield complex food webs.

Authors:  R J Williams; N D Martinez
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.

Authors:  R Milo; S Shen-Orr; S Itzkovitz; N Kashtan; D Chklovskii; U Alon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Two degrees of separation in complex food webs.

Authors:  Richard J Williams; Eric L Berlow; Jennifer A Dunne; Albert-László Barabási; Neo D Martinez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The probabilistic niche model reveals substantial variation in the niche structure of empirical food webs.

Authors:  Richard J Williams; Drew W Purves
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Genetic specificity of a plant-insect food web: Implications for linking genetic variation to network complexity.

Authors:  Matthew A Barbour; Miguel A Fortuna; Jordi Bascompte; Joshua R Nicholson; Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto; Erik S Jules; Gregory M Crutsinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Foraging biology predicts food web complexity.

Authors:  Andrew P Beckerman; Owen L Petchey; Philip H Warren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reconciling complexity with stability in naturally assembling food webs.

Authors:  Anje-Margriet Neutel; Johan A P Heesterbeek; Johan van de Koppel; Guido Hoenderboom; An Vos; Coen Kaldeway; Frank Berendse; Peter C de Ruiter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The community effects of phenotypic and genetic variation within a predator population.

Authors:  Sebastian J Schreiber; Reinhard Bürger; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Coupled dynamics of body mass and population growth in response to environmental change.

Authors:  Arpat Ozgul; Dylan Z Childs; Madan K Oli; Kenneth B Armitage; Daniel T Blumstein; Lucretia E Olson; Shripad Tuljapurkar; Tim Coulson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Individuals in food webs: the relationships between trophic position, omnivory and among-individual diet variation.

Authors:  Richard Svanbäck; Mario Quevedo; Jens Olsson; Peter Eklöv
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  10 in total

1.  Prey body mass and richness underlie the persistence of a top predator.

Authors:  Laura Melissa Guzman; Diane S Srivastava
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Predator coevolution and prey trait variability determine species coexistence.

Authors:  Thomas Scheuerl; Johannes Cairns; Lutz Becks; Teppo Hiltunen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Linking species traits and demography to explain complex temperature responses across levels of organization.

Authors:  Daniel J Wieczynski; Pranav Singla; Adrian Doan; Alexandra Singleton; Ze-Yi Han; Samantha Votzke; Andrea Yammine; Jean P Gibert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  On the evolution of trophic position.

Authors:  Marvin Moosmann; Maria Cuenca-Cambronero; Stephen De Lisle; Ryan Greenway; Cameron M Hudson; Moritz D Lürig; Blake Matthews
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 11.274

5.  Constraints and variation in food web link-species space.

Authors:  Jean P Gibert; Daniel J Wieczynski
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Temperature alters the shape of predator-prey cycles through effects on underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  John P DeLong; Shelby Lyon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Temperature directly and indirectly influences food web structure.

Authors:  Jean P Gibert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Genomic reaction norms inform predictions of plastic and adaptive responses to climate change.

Authors:  Rebekah A Oomen; Jeffrey A Hutchings
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Responses of zooplankton body size and community trophic structure to temperature change in a subtropical reservoir.

Authors:  Xiaofei Gao; Huihuang Chen; Lynn Govaert; Wenping Wang; Jun Yang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Geography is essential for reproductive isolation between florally diversified morning glory species from Amazon canga savannahs.

Authors:  Elena Babiychuk; Juliana Galaschi Teixeira; Lourival Tyski; José Tasso Felix Guimaraes; Luiza Araújo Romeiro; Edilson Freitas da Silva; Jorge Filipe Dos Santos; Santelmo Vasconcelos; Delmo Fonseca da Silva; Alexandre Castilho; José Oswaldo Siqueira; Vera Lucia Imperatriz Fonseca; Sergei Kushnir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.