Literature DB >> 21905425

The community effects of phenotypic and genetic variation within a predator population.

Sebastian J Schreiber1, Reinhard Bürger, Daniel I Bolnick.   

Abstract

Natural populations are heterogeneous mixtures of individuals differing in physiology, morphology, and behavior. Despite the ubiquity of phenotypic variation within natural populations, its effects on the dynamics of ecological communities are not well understood. Here, we use a quantitative genetics framework to examine how phenotypic variation in a predator affects the outcome of apparent competition between its two prey species. Classical apparent competition theory predicts that prey have reciprocally negative effects on each other. The addition of phenotypic trait variation in predation can marginalize these negative effects, mediate coexistence, or generate positive indirect effects between the prey species. Long-term coexistence or facilitation, however, can be preceded by long transients of extinction risk whenever the heritability of phenotypic variation is low. Greater heritability can circumvent these ecological transients but also can generate oscillatory and chaotic dynamics. These dramatic changes in ecological outcomes, in the sign of indirect effects, and in stability suggest that studies which ignore intraspecific trait variation may reach fundamentally incorrect conclusions regarding ecological dynamics.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21905425     DOI: 10.1890/10-2071.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  33 in total

1.  Covarying variances: more morphologically variable populations also exhibit more diet variation.

Authors:  Lisa K Snowberg; Kimberly M Hendrix; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Timescales alter the inferred strength and temporal consistency of intraspecific diet specialization.

Authors:  Mark Novak; M Tim Tinker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Antagonistic coevolution between quantitative and Mendelian traits.

Authors:  Masato Yamamichi; Stephen P Ellner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Personality, foraging behavior and specialization: integrating behavioral and food web ecology at the individual level.

Authors:  Benjamin J Toscano; Natasha J Gownaris; Sarah M Heerhartz; Cristián J Monaco
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Phenotypic variation explains food web structural patterns.

Authors:  Jean P Gibert; John P DeLong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolutionary contribution to coexistence of competitors in microbial food webs.

Authors:  Teppo Hiltunen; Veijo Kaitala; Jouni Laakso; Lutz Becks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Robust permanence for ecological equations with internal and external feedbacks.

Authors:  Swati Patel; Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.259

8.  Destabilizing evolutionary and eco-evolutionary feedbacks drive empirical eco-evolutionary cycles.

Authors:  Michael H Cortez; Swati Patel; Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Resource diversity promotes among-individual diet variation, but not genomic diversity, in lake stickleback.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Kimberly M Ballare
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 9.492

10.  Reciprocal behavioral plasticity and behavioral types during predator-prey interactions.

Authors:  Katie E McGhee; Lauren M Pintor; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.