Emily R Spitzer1,2, Michelle L Hughes1. 1. Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE. 2. University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading, symmetrical, biphasic current pulses, despite a growing body of evidence that suggests anodic-leading pulses may be more effective at stimulating the auditory system. However, since much of this research on humans has used pseudomonophasic pulses or biphasic pulses with unusually long interphase gaps, the effects of stimulus polarity are unclear for clinically relevant (i.e., symmetric biphasic) stimuli. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of stimulus polarity on basic characteristics of physiological spread-of-excitation (SOE) measures obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in CI recipients using clinically relevant stimuli. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using a within-subjects (repeated measures) design, we examined the differences in mean amplitude, peak electrode location, area under the curve, and spatial separation between SOE curves obtained with anodic- and cathodic-leading symmetrical, biphasic pulses. STUDY SAMPLE: Fifteen CI recipients (ages 13-77) participated in this study. All were users of Cochlear Ltd. devices. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: SOE functions were obtained using the standard forward-masking artifact reduction method. Probe electrodes were 5-18, and they were stimulated at an 8 (of 10) loudness rating ("loud"). Outcome measures (mean amplitude, peak electrode location, curve area, and spatial separation) for each polarity were compared within subjects. RESULTS: Anodic-leading current pulses produced ECAPs with larger average amplitudes, greater curve area, and less spatial separation between SOE patterns compared with that for cathodic-leading pulses. There was no effect of polarity on peak electrode location. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that for equal current levels, the anodic-leading polarity produces broader excitation patterns compared with cathodic-leading pulses, which reduces the spatial separation between functions. This result is likely due to preferential stimulation of the central axon. Further research is needed to determine whether SOE patterns obtained with anodic-leading pulses better predict pitch discrimination. American Academy of Audiology
BACKGROUND: Contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading, symmetrical, biphasic current pulses, despite a growing body of evidence that suggests anodic-leading pulses may be more effective at stimulating the auditory system. However, since much of this research on humans has used pseudomonophasic pulses or biphasic pulses with unusually long interphase gaps, the effects of stimulus polarity are unclear for clinically relevant (i.e., symmetric biphasic) stimuli. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of stimulus polarity on basic characteristics of physiological spread-of-excitation (SOE) measures obtained with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in CI recipients using clinically relevant stimuli. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using a within-subjects (repeated measures) design, we examined the differences in mean amplitude, peak electrode location, area under the curve, and spatial separation between SOE curves obtained with anodic- and cathodic-leading symmetrical, biphasic pulses. STUDY SAMPLE: Fifteen CI recipients (ages 13-77) participated in this study. All were users of Cochlear Ltd. devices. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: SOE functions were obtained using the standard forward-masking artifact reduction method. Probe electrodes were 5-18, and they were stimulated at an 8 (of 10) loudness rating ("loud"). Outcome measures (mean amplitude, peak electrode location, curve area, and spatial separation) for each polarity were compared within subjects. RESULTS: Anodic-leading current pulses produced ECAPs with larger average amplitudes, greater curve area, and less spatial separation between SOE patterns compared with that for cathodic-leading pulses. There was no effect of polarity on peak electrode location. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that for equal current levels, the anodic-leading polarity produces broader excitation patterns compared with cathodic-leading pulses, which reduces the spatial separation between functions. This result is likely due to preferential stimulation of the central axon. Further research is needed to determine whether SOE patterns obtained with anodic-leading pulses better predict pitch discrimination. American Academy of Audiology
Authors: Jaime A Undurraga; Robert P Carlyon; Olivier Macherey; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen Journal: Hear Res Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 3.208
Authors: Olivier Macherey; Astrid van Wieringen; Robert P Carlyon; Ingeborg Dhooge; Jan Wouters Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Kevin Y Zhan; Oliver F Adunka; Adrien Eshraghi; William J Riggs; Sandra M Prentiss; Denise Yan; Fred F Telischi; Xuezhong Liu; Shuman He Journal: J Otol Date: 2020-08-01