Literature DB >> 15953517

Histopathology of human cochlear implants: correlation of psychophysical and anatomical measures.

Aayesha M Khan1, Darren M Whiten, Joseph B Nadol, Donald K Eddington.   

Abstract

The cadavaric temporal bones of five subjects who underwent cochlear implantation during life (2 Nucleus and 3 Ineraid) were analyzed using two-dimensional (2D) reconstruction of serial sections to determine the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells (SGCs) in the region of each electrode of the implanted arrays. The last psychophysical threshold and maximum-comfortable sensation level measured for each electrode were compared to their respective SGC count to determine the across-electrode psychophysical variance accounted for by the SGC counts. Significant correlations between psychophysical measures and SGC counts were found in only two of the five subjects: one Nucleus implantee (e.g., r=-0.71; p<0.001 for threshold vs. count) and one Ineraid implantee (e.g., r=-0.86; p<0.05 for threshold vs. count). A three-dimensional (3D) model of the implanted cochlea was formulated using the temporal-bone anatomy of the Nucleus subject for whom the 2D analysis did not result in significant correlations between counts and psychophysical measures. Predictions of the threshold vs. electrode profile were closer to the measured profile for the 3D model than for the 2D analysis. These results lead us to hypothesize that 3D techniques will be required to asses the impact of peripheral anatomy on the benefit patients derive from cochlear implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15953517     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

1.  The effect of cochlear-implant-mediated electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion cells in congenitally deaf white cats.

Authors:  Iris Chen; Charles J Limb; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-04

Review 2.  Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-06

3.  Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim; Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; John C Middlebrooks; Ben H Bonham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Importance of cochlear health for implant function.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Ning Zhou; Deborah J Colesa; Melissa M Watts; Stefan B Strahl; Soha N Garadat; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Cameron L Budenz; Yehoash Raphael; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Cochlear-implant spatial selectivity with monopolar, bipolar and tripolar stimulation.

Authors:  Ziyan Zhu; Qing Tang; Fan-Gang Zeng; Tian Guan; Datian Ye
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Factors influencing neurotrophic effects of electrical stimulation in the deafened developing auditory system.

Authors:  Patricia A Leake; Olga Stakhovskaya; Gary T Hradek; Alexander M Hetherington
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.