Literature DB >> 28971939

Quantum-like dynamics applied to cognition: a consideration of available options.

Jan Broekaert1, Irina Basieva2, Pawel Blasiak3, Emmanuel M Pothos2.   

Abstract

Quantum probability theory (QPT) has provided a novel, rich mathematical framework for cognitive modelling, especially for situations which appear paradoxical from classical perspectives. This work concerns the dynamical aspects of QPT, as relevant to cognitive modelling. We aspire to shed light on how the mind's driving potentials (encoded in Hamiltonian and Lindbladian operators) impact the evolution of a mental state. Some existing QPT cognitive models do employ dynamical aspects when considering how a mental state changes with time, but it is often the case that several simplifying assumptions are introduced. What kind of modelling flexibility does QPT dynamics offer without any simplifying assumptions and is it likely that such flexibility will be relevant in cognitive modelling? We consider a series of nested QPT dynamical models, constructed with a view to accommodate results from a simple, hypothetical experimental paradigm on decision-making. We consider Hamiltonians more complex than the ones which have traditionally been employed with a view to explore the putative explanatory value of this additional complexity. We then proceed to compare simple models with extensions regarding both the initial state (e.g. a mixed state with a specific orthogonal decomposition; a general mixed state) and the dynamics (by introducing Hamiltonians which destroy the separability of the initial structure and by considering an open-system extension). We illustrate the relations between these models mathematically and numerically.This article is part of the themed issue 'Second quantum revolution: foundational questions'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  Lindblad evolution; Schrödinger evolution; cognition; quantum-like dynamics

Year:  2017        PMID: 28971939      PMCID: PMC5628256          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  19 in total

1.  Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice.

Authors:  E Shafir; A Tversky
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Probabilistic models of cognition: exploring representations and inductive biases.

Authors:  Thomas L Griffiths; Nick Chater; Charles Kemp; Amy Perfors; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  The heuristic-analytic theory of reasoning: extension and evaluation.

Authors:  Jonathan St B T Evans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

4.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  How to grow a mind: statistics, structure, and abstraction.

Authors:  Joshua B Tenenbaum; Charles Kemp; Thomas L Griffiths; Noah D Goodman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Zeno's paradox in decision-making.

Authors:  James M Yearsley; Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Is there something quantum-like about the human mental lexicon?

Authors:  Peter Bruza; Kirsty Kitto; Douglas Nelson; Cathy McEvoy
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.223

8.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of 'rational' decision theory.

Authors:  Emmanuel M Pothos; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Quantum models for psychological measurements: an unsolved problem.

Authors:  Andrei Khrennikov; Irina Basieva; Ehtibar N Dzhafarov; Jerome R Busemeyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Commentary: Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment.

Authors:  Peter Lewinski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-25
View more
  8 in total

1.  More Causes Less Effect: Destructive Interference in Decision Making.

Authors:  Irina Basieva; Vijitashwa Pandey; Polina Khrennikova
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.738

2.  Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?

Authors:  Bartosz W Wojciechowski; Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-05

3.  Corrigendum: Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?

Authors:  Bartosz W Wojciechowski; Emmanuel M Pothos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-27

4.  On Interpretational Questions for Quantum-Like Modeling of Social Lasing.

Authors:  Andrei Khrennikov; Alexander Alodjants; Anastasiia Trofimova; Dmitry Tsarev
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-02       Impact factor: 2.524

5.  Social Laser Model for the Bandwagon Effect: Generation of Coherent Information Waves.

Authors:  Andrei Khrennikov
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.524

6.  Non-Hermitian Operator Modelling of Basic Cancer Cell Dynamics.

Authors:  Fabio Bagarello; Francesco Gargano
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.524

7.  A Planck Radiation and Quantization Scheme for Human Cognition and Language.

Authors:  Diederik Aerts; Lester Beltran
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-19

8.  Are Words the Quanta of Human Language? Extending the Domain of Quantum Cognition.

Authors:  Diederik Aerts; Lester Beltran
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.524

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.