| Literature DB >> 20576465 |
Thomas L Griffiths1, Nick Chater, Charles Kemp, Amy Perfors, Joshua B Tenenbaum.
Abstract
Cognitive science aims to reverse-engineer the mind, and many of the engineering challenges the mind faces involve induction. The probabilistic approach to modeling cognition begins by identifying ideal solutions to these inductive problems. Mental processes are then modeled using algorithms for approximating these solutions, and neural processes are viewed as mechanisms for implementing these algorithms, with the result being a top-down analysis of cognition starting with the function of cognitive processes. Typical connectionist models, by contrast, follow a bottom-up approach, beginning with a characterization of neural mechanisms and exploring what macro-level functional phenomena might emerge. We argue that the top-down approach yields greater flexibility for exploring the representations and inductive biases that underlie human cognition. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20576465 DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Cogn Sci ISSN: 1364-6613 Impact factor: 20.229