| Literature DB >> 28969009 |
Fuu-Jen Tsai1,2,3, Te-Mao Li1, Cheng-Hang Ko4, Wen-Miin Liang5, Ying-Ju Lin1,2, Chi-Fung Cheng5, Tsung-Jung Ho1, Xiang Liu6, Hsinyi Tsang6, Ting-Hsu Lin2, Chiu-Chu Liao2, Ju-Pi Li1,7, Shao-Mei Huang2, Jung-Chun Lin8, Chih-Chien Lin9.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy is a microvascular complication of type 2 diabetes and the leading cause of acquired blindness. In Taiwan, Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) is a popular adjunctive therapy. In this study, we investigated the CHM prescription patterns and their effects. We identified 23,701 subjects with type 2 diabetes in a database, and after matching for age and gender, 6,948 patients each were assigned to CHM and non-CHM groups. In the female subgroups, the cumulative retinopathy probability was lower for the CHM users than that for the CHM non-users (P < 0.001, log-rank test). Among the top 10 CHMs, Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San (JWXYS; 52.9%), Shu-Jing-Huo-Xue-Tang (SJHXT; 45.1%), and Ge-Gen-Tang (GGT; 43.7%) were the most common herbal formulas. Yan-Hu-Suo (48.1%), Ge-Gen (42.1%), and Huang-Qin (HQin; 40.1%) were the most common single herbs. CHM network analysis showed that JWXYS was the core CHM of cluster 1. JWXYS, DS, XF, and SZRT exhibited both of the reductions of H2O2-induced phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2) in human ARPE-19 retina cells. In cluster 2, SJHXT was the core CHM. SJHXT and NX showed both of the phosphorylation reductions. In cluster 3, GGT was the core CHM, and it reduced the phosphorylation of both MAPKs. In cluster 4, HQin was the core CHM, and it also reduced the phosphorylation of both MAPKs. Our study suggests that adjunctive CHM therapy may reduce diabetic retinopathy via antioxidant activity of the herbs and provides information on core CHM treatments for further scientific investigations or therapeutic interventions.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese herbal medicine; diabetic retinopathy; oxidative stress; retina cells; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28969009 PMCID: PMC5609941 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18846
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Enrollment of type 2 diabetes patients
Patients with type 2 diabetes were identified for our study cohort after the exclusions listed above.
Baseline characteristics of total subjects and propensity score matched subjects with T2D according to CHM use
| Characteristics | Total subjects | Matched subjects | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHM group | Non-CHM group | CHM group | non-CHM group | |||
| N=7,213 | N=16,488 | N=6,948 | N=6,948 | |||
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | |||
| 0.424 | ||||||
| 20-40 yrs | 755 (10.47) | 1,469 (8.91) | 732 (10.54) | 666 (9.59) | ||
| 40-50 yrs | 1,589 (22.03) | 3,044 (18.46) | 1,490 (21.45) | 1,460 (21.01) | ||
| 50-60 yrs | 2,188 (30.33) | 4,229 (25.65) | 2,106 (30.31) | 2,149 (30.93) | ||
| 60-70 yrs | 1,574 (21.82) | 3,221 (19.54) | 1,513 (21.78) | 1,520 (21.88) | ||
| 70-80 yrs | 894 (12.39) | 2,904 (17.61) | 894 (12.87) | 938 (13.50) | ||
| ≧80 yrs | 213 (2.95) | 1,621 (9.83) | 213 (3.07) | 215 (3.09) | ||
| 0.973 | ||||||
| Male | 10,899 (66.10) | 3,242 (44.95) | 3,242 (46.66) | 3,240 (46.63) | ||
| Female | 5,589 (33.90) | 3,971 (55.05) | 3,706 (53.34) | 3,708 (53.37) | ||
| 0.505 | ||||||
| No | 5,559 (77.07) | 13,366 (81.07) | 5,506 (79.25) | 5,474 (78.79) | ||
| Yes | 1,654 (22.93) | 3,122 (18.93) | 1,442 (20.75) | 1,474 (21.21) | ||
| 0.688 | ||||||
| No | 6,401 (88.74) | 14,141 (85.77) | 6,168 (88.77) | 6,153 (88.56) | ||
| Yes | 812 (11.26) | 2,347 (14.23) | 780 (11.23) | 795 (11.44) | ||
| 0.535 | 0.434 | |||||
| No | 6,877 (95.34) | 15,750 (95.52) | 6,630 (95.42) | 6,649 (95.70) | ||
| Yes | 336 (4.66) | 738 (4.48) | 318 (4.58) | 299 (4.30) | ||
| No | 4,602 (63.80) | 11,442 (69.40) | 4,455 (64.12) | 4,733 (68.12) | ||
| Yes | 2,611 (36.20) | 5,046 (30.60) | 2,493 (35.88) | 2,215 (31.88) | ||
| 0.249 | 0.845 | |||||
| No | 7,156 (99.21) | 16,380 (99.34) | 6,894 (99.22) | 6,896 (99.25) | ||
| Yes | 57 (0.79) | 108 (0.66) | 54 (0.78) | 52 (0.75) | ||
| 0.018 | 0.911 | |||||
| No | 7,173 (99.45) | 16,349 (99.16) | 6,908 (99.42) | 6,907 (99.41) | ||
| Yes | 40 (0.55) | 139 (0.84) | 40 (0.58) | 41 (0.59) | ||
| 0.285 | ||||||
| No | 3,808 (52.79) | 7,926 (48.07) | 3,631 (52.26) | 3,568 (51.35) | ||
| Yes | 3,405 (47.21) | 8,562 (51.93) | 3,317 (47.74) | 3,380 (48.65) | ||
| 0.942 | ||||||
| No | 7,117 (98.67) | 16,052 (97.36) | 6,852 (98.62) | 6,853 (98.63) | ||
| Yes | 96 (1.33) | 436 (2.64) | 96 (1.38) | 95 (1.37) | ||
| <0.001 | 0.429 | |||||
| No | 5265 (72.99) | 12746 (77.30) | 5146 (74.06) | 5105 (73.47) | ||
| Yes | 1948 (27.01) | 3742 (22.70) | 1802 (25.94) | 1843 (26.53) | ||
| <0.001 | 0.976 | |||||
| No | 6571 (91.10) | 15271 (92.62) | 6353 (91.44) | 6354 (91.45) | ||
| Yes | 642 (8.90) | 1217 (7.38) | 595 (8.56) | 594 (8.55) | ||
| 0.085 | 0.178 | |||||
| No | 7196 (99.76) | 16426 (99.62) | 6931 (99.76) | 6938 (99.86) | ||
| Yes | 17 (0.24) | 62 (0.38) | 17 (0.24) | 10 (0.14) | ||
| <NT20000 | 2,728 (37.82) | 7,068 (42.87) | 2,629 (37.84) | 2,928 (42.14) | ||
| NT20000∼NT30000 | 2,512 (34.83) | 5,581 (33.85) | 2,404 (34.60) | 2,396 (34.48) | ||
| NT30000∼NT40000 | 1,227 (17.01) | 2,180 (13.22) | 1,175 (16.91) | 995 (14.32) | ||
| >=NT40000 | 746 (10.34) | 1,659 (10.06) | 740 (10.65) | 629 (9.05) | ||
| 1 | 3,112 (43.14) | 6,830 (41.42) | 3,003 (43.22) | 2,975 (42.82) | ||
| 2 | 1,797 (24.91) | 3,950 (23.96) | 1,727 (24.86) | 1,674 (24.09) | ||
| 3 | 663 (9.19) | 1,411 (8.56) | 641 (9.23) | 592 (8.52) | ||
| 4 | 623 (8.64) | 1,558 (9.45) | 600 (8.64) | 573 (8.25) | ||
| 5 | 1,018 (14.11) | 2,739 (16.61) | 977 (14.06) | 1,134 (16.32) | ||
p values were obtained by chi-square test. p value (p < 0.05) was highlighted in bold italic.
T2D, type 2 diabetes; CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; N, number; NT, new Taiwan dollars.
Urbanization level: 1 indicates the hightest level of urbanization and 5 is the lowest level.
The comorbidities include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ICD-9-CM: 490–496), cerebrovascular disease (ICD-9-CM: 430–438), renal disease (ICD-9-CM: 582, 583–583.7, 585, 586, and 588), hyperlipidemia (ICD-9-CM: 272), obesity (ICD-9-CM: 278 and 278.01), alcohol-related illness (ICD-9-CM: 303, 305, 305.01, 305.02, 305.03, and V11.3), hypertension (ICD-9-CM: 401-405), and myocardial infarction (ICD-9-CM: 410 and 412). These comorbidities are identified before the T2D diagnosis.
Hazard ratios (95% CI) for diabetic retinopathy when T2D patients were stratified by gender
| CHM user (Ref: non-CHM user) | Hazard ratio (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 (0.70-1.10) | 0.244 | |
| Male | 0.85 (0.52-1.83) | 0.511 |
| Female | 0.56 (0.36-0.86) |
CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; Ref: Reference; T2D, type 2 diabetes; CI, confidence interval.
*Models adjusted for age, comorbidities, anti-hypertensives drug before T2D, and statin before T2D.
Cox's proportional hazards model and Fine & Grays’ model were applied in this analysis.
p value (p < 0.05) was highlighted in bold italic.
Figure 2Cumulative probability of diabetic retinopathy in female patients with T2D according to the CHM use
Ten most commonly used herbal formulas and single herbs for female patients with T2D
| Formulas | Pin-yin name (shorten name) | Chinese name | Number of herbs | Composition (Pin-yin name (latin name; botanical plant name)) | User number | Percentage of user number | Frequency of prescription | Person-year | Average drug dose per day (g) | Average duration for prescription (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2068 | 100 | 96735 | 12847.3 | 12.2 | 7.2 | |||||
| 2064 | 99.8 | 93106 | 12831.2 | 9.4 | 7.2 | |||||
| 加味逍遙散 | 10 | 1095 | 52.9 | 8669 | 7016.2 | 4.4 | 8.7 | |||
| 舒經活血湯 | 17 | 932 | 45.1 | 5137 | 6279.1 | 4 | 7.4 | |||
| 葛根湯 | 7 | 904 | 43.7 | 4658 | 5994.8 | 4.2 | 6.5 | |||
| 芍藥甘草湯 | 2 | 801 | 38.7 | 3738 | 5373.8 | 3 | 6.4 | |||
| 川芎茶調散 | 10 | 786 | 38 | 4687 | 5323.6 | 4.3 | 6.2 | |||
| 銀翹散 | 10 | 733 | 35.4 | 3490 | 4969.8 | 3.8 | 5.9 | |||
| 血府逐瘀湯 | 11 | 716 | 34.6 | 3563 | 4771.1 | 3.6 | 8.2 | |||
| 麻杏石甘湯 | 4 | 699 | 33.8 | 2819 | 4755.3 | 3.7 | 6 | |||
| 六味地黄丸 | 6 | 688 | 33.3 | 3475 | 4662 | 4.4 | 8.1 | |||
| 酸棗仁湯 | 5 | 638 | 30.9 | 3486 | 4204.3 | 3.9 | 7.7 | |||
| 2031 | 98.2 | 77320 | 12617 | 4 | 7.3 | |||||
| 延胡索 | 1 | 994 | 48.1 | 5999 | 6572.8 | 1.1 | 6.9 | |||
| 葛根 | 1 | 871 | 42.1 | 5016 | 5737.6 | 1.3 | 7.3 | |||
| 黄芩 | 1 | 830 | 40.1 | 4604 | 5475.6 | 1.1 | 7 | |||
| 丹參 | 1 | 814 | 39.4 | 5297 | 5270.5 | 1.2 | 8.9 | |||
| 桔梗 | 1 | 792 | 38.3 | 4359 | 5135.2 | 1 | 6.3 | |||
| 貝母 | 1 | 765 | 37 | 4900 | 5038 | 1.1 | 6.7 | |||
| 天花粉 | 1 | 746 | 36.1 | 4173 | 4928.7 | 1.2 | 7.9 | |||
| 牛膝 | 1 | 659 | 31.9 | 3182 | 4482.9 | 1.1 | 7.7 | |||
| 香附 | 1 | 657 | 31.8 | 3327 | 4347.2 | 1 | 7.2 | |||
| 黃耆 | 1 | 653 | 31.6 | 3219 | 4273.4 | 1.3 | 8.1 |
*Sorted by user number. T2D, type 2 diabetes.
aInformation are obtained from the websites (http://www.americandragon.com/index.htm; http://old.tcmwiki.com/; http://www.shen-nong.com/eng/front/index.html; http://www.ipni.org/; http://www.theplantlist.org/).
Figure 3Effects of CHMs (JWXYS, SJHXT, GGT, SYGCT, XFZYT, MXSGT, LWDHW, and SZRT) on H2O2-treated ARPE-19 cells
Cells treated with insulin (200 nM) were used as controls. The insulin- and CHM-treated cells were then incubated with an H2O2 (300 μM) solution. Western blot analysis was performed by staining membranes with anti-phospho-p38 MAPK, anti-p38 MAPK, anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK, anti-p44/42 MAPK, and anti-GAPDH antibodies. (A) Western blot analysis of phospho-p38 MAPK, p38 MAPK, phospho-p44/42 MAPK, p44/42 MAPK, and GAPDH protein expression. (B) The ratio of phospho-p38 MAPK to p38 MAPK in various treatment groups versus that in untreated cells. *P < 0.05. (C) The ratio of phospho-p44/42 MAPKs to p44/42 MAPKs in various treatment groups versus that in untreated cells. *P < 0.05.
Figure 4Effects of CHMs (YQS and CXCTS) on H2O2-treated ARPE-19 cells
Cells treated with insulin (200 nM) were used as controls. The insulin- and CHM-treated cells were then incubated with an H2O2 (300 μM) solution. Western blot analysis was performed by staining membranes with anti-phospho-p38 MAPK, anti-p38 MAPK, anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK, anti-p44/42 MAPK, and anti-GAPDH antibodies. (A) Western blot analysis of phospho-p38 MAPK, p38 MAPK, phospho-p44/42 MAPK, p44/42 MAPK, and GAPDH protein expression. (B) The ratio of phospho-p38 MAPK to p38 MAPK in various treatment groups versus that in untreated cells. *P < 0.05. (C) The ratio of phospho-p44/42 MAPKs to p44/42 MAPKs in various treatment groups versus that in untreated cells.
Figure 5Effects of CHMs (HQin, GG, YHS, DS, JG, and NX) on H2O2-treated ARPE-19 cells
Cells treated with insulin (200 nM) were used as controls. The insulin- and CHM-treated cells were then incubated with an H2O2 (300 μM) solution. Western blot analysis was performed by staining membranes with anti-phospho-p38 MAPK, anti-p38 MAPK, anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK, anti-p44/42 MAPK, and anti-GAPDH antibodies. (A) Western blot analysis of phospho-p38 MAPK, p38 MAPK, phospho-p44/42 MAPK, p44/42 MAPK, and GAPDH protein expression. (B) The ratio of phospho-p38 MAPK to p38 MAPK in various treatment groups versus that in untreated cells. *P < 0.05. (C) The ratio of phospho-p44/42 MAPKs to p44/42 MAPKs in various treatment groups versus that in untreated cells. *P < 0.05.
Figure 6Effects of CHMs (BM, THF, HQ, and XF) on H2O2-treated ARPE-19 cells
Cells treated with insulin (200 nM) were used as controls. The insulin- and CHM-treated cells were then incubated with an H2O2 (300 μM) solution. Western blot analysis was performed by staining membranes with anti-phospho-p38 MAPK, anti-p38 MAPK, anti-phospho-p44/42 MAPK, anti-p44/42 MAPK, and anti-GAPDH antibodies. (A) Western blot analysis of phospho-p38 MAPK, p38 MAPK, phospho-p44/42 MAPK, p44/42 MAPK, and GAPDH protein expression. (B) The ratio of phospho-p38 MAPK to p38 MAPK in various treatment groups versus that in untreated cells. *P < 0.05. (C) The ratio of phospho-p44/42 MAPKs to p44/42 MAPKs in various treatment groups versus that in untreated cells. *P < 0.05.
Six most commonly used combinations for female patients with T2D
| CHM combinations | User number | Percentage of user number | Frequency of prescription | Person-year | Average drug dose per day (g) | Average duration for prescription (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1828 | 100 | 26977 | 11449 | 5.7 | 7.4 | |
| 271 | 14.8 | 774 | 1873 | 6.5 | 6.8 | |
| 270 | 14.8 | 821 | 1761 | 2.1 | 6.3 | |
| 237 | 13 | 640 | 1606 | 4.2 | 6.4 | |
| 227 | 12.4 | 648 | 1489 | 5.2 | 7 | |
| 221 | 12.1 | 702 | 1490 | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
| 212 | 11.6 | 827 | 1478 | 5.7 | 10.4 |
*Sorted by user number.
aInformation are obtained from the websites (http://www.americandragon.com/index.htm; http://old.tcmwiki.com/; http://www.shen-nong.com/eng/front/index.html; http://www.ipni.org/; http://www.theplantlist.org/).
CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
Figure 7CHM network for female patients with T2D
The connection lines between CHMs represent user numbers for CHM combinations. The connection between CHMs is more important when the connection line is thicker and darker. The size of the circle represents the frequency of prescriptions for each CHM.