Literature DB >> 20625974

Total and cardiovascular disease mortality predicted by metabolic syndrome is inferior relative to its components.

R Haring1, H Wallaschofski, M Nauck, S B Felix, C O Schmidt, M Dörr, S Sauer, G Wilmking, H Völzke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the predictive role of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its single components for total and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 3,927 participants aged 20-79 years without history of CVD, recruited for the prospective population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). During the mean 7.2 years (25 (th), 6.6; 75 (th): 8.0) of follow-up, 240 deaths (79 CVD deaths) occurred. MetS was defined by National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. The association of MetS with total and CVD mortality was analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression models. The impact of single MetS components on survival time was compared using standardized beta coefficients from multivariable linear regression models.
RESULTS: Baseline MetS prevalence was 28.8%. Age- and gender-adjusted Cox models revealed that participants with MetS had an increased risk of total mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.41; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.09-1.82) and CVD mortality (HR 1.82; 95% CI 1.22-3.13) compared to participants without MetS. Of the single MetS components, participants with increased waist circumference (WC) and glucose levels exposed highest risk of total (HR 1.49; 95% CI 1.10-2.01; HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.58-2.90, respectively) and CVD mortality (HR 2.02; 95% CI 1.13-3.61; HR 3.15; 95% CI 1.94-5.11, respectively). Increasing WC or glucose by 1 standard deviation (SD) significantly decreased age- and gender-adjusted beta coefficients for survival time by 0.09, and 0.08 SD, respectively.
CONCLUSION: There was no added predictive value of MetS beyond its individual components with respect to mortality risk. Attention should be redirected to the individual components, particularly visceral obesity and high glucose, to treat each abnormality appropriately. © J. A. Barth Verlag in Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20625974     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1261876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes        ISSN: 0947-7349            Impact factor:   2.949


  11 in total

1.  Mendelian randomization: loosening the Gordian knot of testosterone and male ageing.

Authors:  David J Handelsman
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 2.  The new puzzle about the treatment of type 2 diabetes after the ACCORD and Da Qing studies.

Authors:  Michael Pfeiffer; Rüdiger von Bauer; Peter P Nawroth
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  "The metabolic syndrome... is dead": these reports are an exaggeration.

Authors:  Alexander Tenenbaum; Enrique Z Fisman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 9.951

4.  A network-based approach to visualize prevalence and progression of metabolic syndrome components.

Authors:  Robin Haring; Martin Rosvall; Uwe Völker; Henry Völzke; Heyo Kroemer; Matthias Nauck; Henri Wallaschofski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Influence of age on the prevalence and components of the metabolic syndrome and the association with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Marion C Devers; Stewart Campbell; David Simmons
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2016-04-25

6.  Evaluation of two single-factor models of metabolic syndrome: a confirmatory factor analysis for an adult population in Beijing.

Authors:  Da Huo; Wei Wang; Xia Li; Qi Gao; Lijuan Wu; Yanxia Luo; Youxin Wang; Puhong Zhang; Xiuhua Guo
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Serum prolactin concentrations as risk factor of metabolic syndrome or type 2 diabetes?

Authors:  Lisa Balbach; Henri Wallaschofski; Henry Völzke; Matthias Nauck; Marcus Dörr; Robin Haring
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.763

8.  Comparison of predictive value of cardiometabolic indices for subclinical atherosclerosis in Chinese adults.

Authors:  Ying Xu; Fang-fang Zeng; Li-ping He; Wen-hua Ling; Wei-qing Chen; Yu-ming Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hyperglycemia induces differential change in oxidative stress at gene expression and functional levels in HUVEC and HMVEC.

Authors:  Hemang Patel; Juan Chen; Kumuda C Das; Mahendra Kavdia
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  Cardiovascular risk factors have larger impact on endothelial function in self-reported healthy women than men in the HUNT3 Fitness study.

Authors:  Eli-Anne Skaug; Erik Madssen; Stian Thoresen Aspenes; Ulrik Wisløff; Øyvind Ellingsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.