| Literature DB >> 26699542 |
Ying-Ju Lin1,2, Tsung-Jung Ho1,3,4, Yi-Chun Yeh5, Chi-Fung Cheng5, Yi-Tzone Shiao6, Chang-Bi Wang5, Wen-Kuei Chien7, Jin-Hua Chen7,8, Xiang Liu9, Hsinyi Tsang9, Ting-Hsu Lin2, Chiu-Chu Liao2, Shao-Mei Huang2, Ju-Pi Li1,10, Cheng-Wen Lin11, Hao-Yu Pang11, Jaung-Geng Lin1, Yu-Ching Lan12, Yu-Huei Liu2,13, Shih-Yin Chen1,2, Fuu-Jen Tsai1,2,14, Wen-Miin Liang5.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic, multifactorial, and metabolic disorder accounting for 90% diabetes cases worldwide. Among them, almost half of T2D have hypertension, which is responsible for cardiovascular disease, morbidity, and mortality in these patients. The Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) prescription patterns of hypertension individuals among T2D patients have yet to be characterized. This study, therefore, aimed to determine their prescription patterns and evaluate the CHM effect. A cohort of one million randomly sampled cases from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) was used to investigate the overall survival rate of CHM users, and prescription patterns. After matching CHM and non-CHM users for age, gender and date of diagnosis of hypertension, 980 subjects for each group were selected. The CHM users were characterized with slightly longer duration time from diabetes to hypertension, and more cases for hyperlipidaemia. The cumulative survival probabilities were higher in CHM users than in non-CHM users. Among these top 12 herbs, Liu-Wei-Di-Huang-Wan, Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San, Dan-Shen, and Ge-Gen were the most common herbs and inhibited in vitro smooth muscle cell contractility. Our study also provides a CHM comprehensive list that may be useful in future investigation of the safety and efficacy for individuals with hypertension among type 2 diabetes patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26699542 PMCID: PMC4689379 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow recruitment diagram.
A: Chart showing the protocol for enrollment of study subjects. B: Follow-up time for CHM and matched non-CHM users.
Demographic characteristics of total subjects and frequency matched subjects with hypertension among type 2 diabetes patients according to CHM usage.
| Characteristics | Total subjects | Frequency matched subjects | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Number | non-CHM user | CHM user |
| Total Number | non-CHM user | CHM user |
| |||||
| N = 2,436 | N = 984 | N = 980 | N = 980 | |||||||||
| N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| <60 yrs | 1,406 | 965 | 39.61 | 441 | 44.82 |
| 902 | 465 | 47.45 | 437 | 44.59 | 0.6047 |
| 60~70 yrs | 978 | 662 | 27.18 | 316 | 32.11 | 615 | 299 | 30.51 | 316 | 32.24 | ||
| 70~80 yrs | 767 | 584 | 23.97 | 183 | 18.6 | 361 | 178 | 18.16 | 183 | 18.67 | ||
| > = 80 yrs | 269 | 225 | 9.24 | 44 | 4.47 | 82 | 38 | 3.88 | 44 | 4.49 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| Male | 2,042 | 1,566 | 64.29 | 476 | 48.37 |
| 952 | 476 | 48.57 | 476 | 48.57 | 1 |
| Female | 1,378 | 870 | 35.71 | 508 | 51.63 | 1,008 | 504 | 51.43 | 504 | 51.43 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 1~2 years | 919 | 694 | 28.49 | 225 | 22.87 |
| 450 | 225 | 22.96 | 225 | 22.96 | 1 |
| 2~4 years | 1512 | 1,074 | 44.09 | 438 | 44.51 | 874 | 437 | 44.59 | 437 | 44.59 | ||
| > = 5 years | 989 | 668 | 27.42 | 321 | 32.62 | 636 | 318 | 32.45 | 318 | 32.45 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| No | 2,852 | 1,999 | 82.06 | 853 | 86.69 |
| 1,680 | 831 | 84.8 | 849 | 86.63 | 0.2453 |
| Yes | 568 | 437 | 17.94 | 131 | 13.31 | 280 | 149 | 15.2 | 131 | 13.37 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| No | 2,664 | 1,889 | 77.55 | 775 | 78.76 | 0.4382 | 1,540 | 769 | 78.47 | 771 | 78.67 | 0.9123 |
| Yes | 756 | 547 | 22.45 | 209 | 21.24 | 420 | 211 | 21.53 | 209 | 21.33 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| No | 3,225 | 2,288 | 93.92 | 937 | 95.22 | 0.1692 | 1,858 | 924 | 94.29 | 934 | 95.31 | 0.3092 |
| Yes | 195 | 148 | 6.08 | 47 | 4.78 | 102 | 56 | 5.71 | 46 | 4.69 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| No | 1,964 | 1,468 | 60.26 | 496 | 50.41 |
| 1,042 | 548 | 55.92 | 494 | 50.41 |
|
| Yes | 1,456 | 968 | 39.74 | 488 | 49.59 | 918 | 432 | 44.08 | 486 | 49.59 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| No | 3,374 | 2,409 | 98.89 | 965 | 98.07 | 0.0587 | 1,927 | 966 | 98.57 | 961 | 98.06 | 0.38 |
| Yes | 46 | 27 | 1.11 | 19 | 1.93 | 33 | 14 | 1.43 | 19 | 1.94 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| No | 3,369 | 2,397 | 98.4 | 972 | 98.78 | 0.4047 | 1,931 | 963 | 98.27 | 968 | 98.78 | 0.3496 |
| Yes | 51 | 39 | 1.6 | 12 | 1.22 | 29 | 17 | 1.73 | 12 | 1.22 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| No | 3,401 | 2,426 | 99.59 | 975 | 99.09 | 0.0726 | 1,948 | 977 | 99.69 | 971 | 99.08 | 0.0823 |
| Yes | 19 | 10 | 0.41 | 9 | 0.91 | 12 | 3 | 0.31 | 9 | 0.92 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| <NT20000 | 739 | 582 | 23.89 | 157 | 15.96 |
| 359 | 202 | 20.61 | 157 | 16.02 |
|
| NT20000~NT30000 | 677 | 491 | 20.16 | 186 | 18.9 | 381 | 196 | 20 | 185 | 18.88 | ||
| NT30000~NT40000 | 1,438 | 982 | 40.31 | 456 | 46.34 | 894 | 441 | 45 | 453 | 46.22 | ||
| > = NT40000 | 566 | 381 | 15.64 | 185 | 18.8 | 326 | 141 | 14.39 | 185 | 18.88 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 1 | 817 | 574 | 23.56 | 243 | 24.7 | 0.3331 | 488 | 245 | 25 | 243 | 24.8 | 0.4303 |
| 2 | 1,033 | 739 | 30.34 | 294 | 29.88 | 605 | 313 | 31.94 | 292 | 29.8 | ||
| 3 | 497 | 340 | 13.96 | 157 | 15.96 | 290 | 133 | 13.57 | 157 | 16.02 | ||
| 4 | 585 | 421 | 17.28 | 164 | 16.67 | 314 | 151 | 15.41 | 163 | 16.63 | ||
| 5 | 488 | 362 | 14.86 | 126 | 12.8 | 263 | 138 | 14.08 | 125 | 12.76 | ||
CHM, Chinese herbal medicine; N, number; NT, new Taiwan dollars.
Urbanization level: 1 indicates the hightest level of urbanization and 5 is the lowest level.
p values were obtained by chi-square test.
p value (p < 0.05) was highlighted in bold italic.
Fig 2Cumulative survival curves of individuals with hypertension among type 2 diabetes patients according to Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) usage.
Twelve most common herbal formulas and single herbs prescribed by TCM doctors for the treatment of hypertension individuals among type 2 diabetes patients.
| Number of Person—years | Frequency of prescriptions | Percentage of usage person | Average daily dose (g) | Average duration for prescription (days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 4,875 | 38,140 | 100 | 11.9 | 7.6 |
|
| 4,858 | 36,685 | 99.6 | 9.1 | 7.6 |
| Shu-Jing-Huo-Xue-Tang | 2,153 | 1,995 | 39.2 | 3.9 | 6.8 |
| Liu-Wei-Di-Huang-Wan | 1,906 | 2,137 | 34.3 | 4 | 8.3 |
| Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San | 1,719 | 1,625 | 32.4 | 4.1 | 8.5 |
| Ge-Gen-Tang | 1,674 | 1,190 | 31.2 | 4.3 | 6.7 |
| Shao-Yao-Gan-Cao-Tang | 1,643 | 1,150 | 30.7 | 3.3 | 7.2 |
| Ma-Xing-Shi-Gan-Tang | 1,549 | 1,349 | 29.1 | 3.9 | 6.2 |
| Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu-Tang | 1,557 | 1,308 | 28.4 | 4 | 8.9 |
| Du-Huo-Ji-Sheng-Tang | 1,479 | 1,380 | 27.4 | 4.7 | 7.8 |
| Chuan-Xiong-Cha-Tiao-San | 1,404 | 1,062 | 26.9 | 4 | 6.2 |
| Ji-Sheng-Shen-Qi-Wan | 1,438 | 1,576 | 26 | 4.1 | 9.6 |
| Gan-Lu-Yin | 1,387 | 1,391 | 25.9 | 3.7 | 7.5 |
| Zhi-Bai-Di-huang-Wan | 1,437 | 1,364 | 25.8 | 4 | 10.1 |
|
| 4,732 | 29,455 | 97.2 | 4 | 7.8 |
| Yan-Hu-Suo | 1,830 | 1,665 | 35.2 | 1.1 | 7.6 |
| Ge-Gen | 1,716 | 1,596 | 34.4 | 1.4 | 8.2 |
| Dan-Shen | 1,798 | 2,179 | 34.3 | 1.3 | 10.3 |
| Tian-Hua-Fen | 1,751 | 1,697 | 33.2 | 1.1 | 9.2 |
| Jie-Geng | 1,715 | 1,413 | 33 | 1 | 6.6 |
| Bei-Mu | 1,618 | 1,436 | 31.5 | 1.1 | 6.9 |
| Huang-Qin | 1,607 | 1,409 | 31.5 | 1.1 | 8 |
| Niu-Xi | 1,635 | 1,345 | 30.6 | 0.9 | 7.9 |
| Mai-Men-Dong | 1,516 | 1,287 | 28.6 | 1.2 | 8.9 |
| Huang-Qi | 1,473 | 1,807 | 28.3 | 1.4 | 8.8 |
| Xuan-Shen | 1,496 | 1,157 | 28.2 | 1.2 | 9 |
| Xing-Ren | 1,472 | 1,057 | 27.9 | 1.1 | 6.7 |
TCM, traditional Chinese medicine.
Follow-up time was from hypertension to the study end (Fig 1B).
Fig 3Effect of the four most common herbal formulas and single herbs on the phosphorylation of myosin light chain (MLC) protein.
Briefly, A10 cells were treated with herbal formulas (A) or single herbs (B). Y27632 (Y10; 10 μM) and calyculin A (A50; 50 μg/ml) were used as negative and positive controls. Western blot analysis and staining with anti-phospho-MLC, anti-total-MLC, and anti-beta actin antibodies was then performed. Phospho-MLC, total-MLC, and beta actin were all obtained with their appropriate protein size bands. The relative Phospho-MLC intensity (%) was expressed as [(Phospho-MLC/total-MLC)drug treated/ (Phospho-MLC/total-MLC)cell only x 100%]. The Mean±SEM values for at least three independent experiments along with the representative western blot were performed.