Literature DB >> 28963153

Do varus or valgus outliers have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments than those which are in-range after a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty? limb and joint line alignment after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

T J Shelton1, A J Nedopil1, S M Howell2, M L Hull3.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of this study were to determine the proportion of patients with outlier varus or valgus alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whether those with outlier varus or valgus alignment have higher forces in the medial or lateral compartments of the knee than those with in-range alignment and whether measurements of the alignment of the limb, knee and components predict compartment forces. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The intra-operative forces in the medial and lateral compartments were measured with an instrumented tibial insert in 67 patients who underwent a kinematically aligned TKA during passive movement. The mean of the forces at full extension, 45° and 90° of flexion determined the force in the medial and lateral compartments. Measurements of the alignment of the limb and the components included the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, proximal medial tibial angle (PMTA), and distal lateral femoral angle (DLFA). Measurements of the alignment of the knee and the components included the tibiofemoral angle (TFA), tibial component angle (TCA) and femoral component angle (FCA). Alignment was measured on post-operative, non-weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) scanograms and categorised as varus or valgus outlier or in-range in relation to mechanically aligned criteria.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients with outlier varus or valgus alignment was 16%/24% for the HKA angle, 55%/0% for the PMTA, 0%/57% for the DLFA, 25%/12% for the TFA, 100%/0% for the TCA, and 0%/64% for the FCA. In general, the forces in the medial and lateral compartments of those with outlier alignment were not different from those with in-range alignment except for the TFA, in which patients with outlier varus alignment had a mean paradoxical force which was 6 lb higher in the lateral compartment than those with in-range alignment. None of the measurements of alignment of the limb, knee and components predicted the force in the medial or lateral compartment.
CONCLUSION: Although kinematically aligned TKA has a high proportion of varus or valgus outliers using mechanically aligned criteria, the intra-operative forces in the medial and lateral compartments of patients with outlier alignment were comparable with those with in-range alignment, with no evidence of overload of the medial or lateral compartment of the knee. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1319-28. ©2017 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Instrumented tibial insert; Kinematic alignment; Knee arthroplasty; Mechanical alignment; Tibial force sensor

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28963153     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B10.BJJ-2017-0066.R1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  16 in total

1.  Is There a Force Target That Predicts Early Patient-reported Outcomes After Kinematically Aligned TKA?

Authors:  Trevor J Shelton; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Alignment in TKA: what has been clear is not anymore!

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Roland Becker; Reha Tandogan; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Stephen Howell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Kinematic alignment more closely restores the groove location and the sulcus angle of the native trochlea than mechanical alignment: implications for prosthetic design.

Authors:  Rocio Lozano; Valentina Campanelli; Stephen Howell; Maury Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Kinematically aligned TKA restores physiological patellofemoral biomechanics in the sagittal plane during a deep knee bend.

Authors:  Stephanie Nicolet-Petersen; Augustine Saiz; Trevor Shelton; Stephen Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Low tibial baseplate migration 1 year after unrestricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty using a medial conforming implant design.

Authors:  Abigail E Niesen; Anna L Garverick; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.114

6.  Total knee arthroplasty in Ranawat II valgus deformity with enlarged femoral valgus cut angle: A new technique to achieve balanced gap.

Authors:  Shuai-Jie Lv; Xiao-Jian Wang; Jie-Feng Huang; Qiang Mao; Bang-Jian He; Pei-Jian Tong
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 1.534

7.  Effect of tibial component alignment on knee kinematics and ligament tension in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Sekiguchi; S Nakamura; S Kuriyama; K Nishitani; H Ito; Y Tanaka; M Watanabe; S Matsuda
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 8.  Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Instrument.

Authors:  Kwang Kyoun Kim; Stephen M Howell; Ye Yeon Won
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.759

9.  Excellent and Good Results Treating Stiffness with Early and Late Manipulation after Unrestricted Caliper-Verified Kinematically Aligned TKA.

Authors:  Adithya Shekhar; Stephen M Howell; Alexander J Nedopil; Maury L Hull
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-02-18

10.  An insert with less than spherical medial conformity causes a loss of passive internal rotation after calipered kinematically aligned TKA.

Authors:  Alexander J Nedopil; Adithya Shekhar; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.