Rocio Lozano1, Valentina Campanelli2, Stephen Howell1, Maury Hull3,4,5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. 2. THINK Surgical, 47201 Lakeview Blvd, Fremont, CA, 94538, USA. 3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. mlhull@ucdavis.edu. 4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. mlhull@ucdavis.edu. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3800, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. mlhull@ucdavis.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) position the prosthetic trochlea that guides patellar tracking differently. The present study determined whether KA or MA more closely restores the groove location and sulcus angle of the prosthetic trochlea to the native trochlea for three femoral component designs. METHODS: Ten 3D femur-cartilage models were created by combining computer tomographic (CT) and laser scans of native human cadaveric femurs. Three femoral component designs were positioned using KA and MA. Measurements of the prosthetic and native trochlea were made along the arc length of the native trochlear groove. The alignment technique with the smaller absolute difference between prosthetic and native for the medial-lateral and radial locations of the groove and sulcus angle of the trochlea more closely restored the native trochlea. RESULTS: For three femoral component designs, KA more closely restored to native the mean medial-lateral location (p = 0.0033 to < 0.0001) and mean radial location (p = 0.0150 to < 0.0001) than MA. For two femoral component designs, KA more closely restored to native the mean sulcus angle (p = 0.0326 to 0.0006) than MA. However, the differences in the mean sulcus angles between KA and MA were less than 2° for all three designs. CONCLUSION: KA more closely restored the native trochlea, which explains why the reported risk of patellofemoral complications for KA is not higher than MA according to five randomized clinical trials. Small design modifications of the medial-lateral and radial locations and sulcus angle are strategies for restoring the native trochlea. Such modifications might further reduce the risk of patellofemoral complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
PURPOSE: Kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) position the prosthetic trochlea that guides patellar tracking differently. The present study determined whether KA or MA more closely restores the groove location and sulcus angle of the prosthetic trochlea to the native trochlea for three femoral component designs. METHODS: Ten 3D femur-cartilage models were created by combining computer tomographic (CT) and laser scans of native human cadaveric femurs. Three femoral component designs were positioned using KA and MA. Measurements of the prosthetic and native trochlea were made along the arc length of the native trochlear groove. The alignment technique with the smaller absolute difference between prosthetic and native for the medial-lateral and radial locations of the groove and sulcus angle of the trochlea more closely restored the native trochlea. RESULTS: For three femoral component designs, KA more closely restored to native the mean medial-lateral location (p = 0.0033 to < 0.0001) and mean radial location (p = 0.0150 to < 0.0001) than MA. For two femoral component designs, KA more closely restored to native the mean sulcus angle (p = 0.0326 to 0.0006) than MA. However, the differences in the mean sulcus angles between KA and MA were less than 2° for all three designs. CONCLUSION: KA more closely restored the native trochlea, which explains why the reported risk of patellofemoral complications for KA is not higher than MA according to five randomized clinical trials. Small design modifications of the medial-lateral and radial locations and sulcus angle are strategies for restoring the native trochlea. Such modifications might further reduce the risk of patellofemoral complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone model; Component alignment; Femur; Patellar tracking; Q-angle; Simulation; TKA; TKR; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee replacement; Trochlear groove
Authors: Donald G Eckhoff; Joel M Bach; Victor M Spitzer; Karl D Reinig; Michelle M Bagur; Todd H Baldini; Nicolas M P Flannery Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2005 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: K M Ghosh; A M Merican; F Iranpour; D J Deehan; Andrew A Amis Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Farhad Iranpour; Azhar M Merican; Wael Dandachli; Andrew A Amis; Justin P Cobb Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Leena Sharma; Jing Song; Dorothy Dunlop; David Felson; Cora E Lewis; Neil Segal; James Torner; T Derek V Cooke; Jean Hietpas; John Lynch; Michael Nevitt Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2010-05-28 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Carolyn Anglin; Karen C T Ho; Jean-Louis Briard; Charles de Lambilly; Christopher Plaskos; Eric Nodwell; Eric Stindel Journal: Comput Aided Surg Date: 2008-11
Authors: Kaushik Hazratwala; William B O'Callaghan; Shilpa Dhariwal; Matthew P R Wilkinson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-09-06 Impact factor: 4.114
Authors: Payam Tarassoli; Jil A Wood; Darren B Chen; Will Griffiths-Jones; Johan Bellemans; Samuel J MacDessi Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 4.114