| Literature DB >> 28962629 |
Zoltán Soltész1,2, Károly Erdélyi3, Tamás Bakonyi4,5, Mónika Barna4, Katalin Szentpáli-Gavallér3, Szabolcs Solt6, Éva Horváth6, Péter Palatitz6, László Kotymán7, Ádám Dán3, László Papp8, Andrea Harnos9, Péter Fehérvári10,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Avian host species have different roles in the amplification and maintenance of West Nile virus (WNV), therefore identifying key taxa is vital in understanding WNV epidemics. Here, we present a comprehensive case study conducted on red-footed falcons, where host-vector, vector-virus and host-virus interactions were simultaneously studied to evaluate host species contribution to WNV circulation qualitatively.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody; Arthropod vector; Culicidae; Falco vespertinus; Host competence; Lineage 2; Mosquito trap; Passive immunity; Transmission ecology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28962629 PMCID: PMC5622512 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2394-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1The device used to trap mosquitoes attracted by falcon broods. The upper side of the plastic sheet is covered with an adhesive gel that traps insects landing on the surface. The sheets were left in this position for 24 h
Number of mosquito sampling events in nest-boxes according to year and breeding stage. Control samples derive from boxes where no breeding occurred in the given year. WNV prevalence estimates in mosquitoes and seroprevalence estimates in nestlings was carried out in 2011
| Year | Breeding stage | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation period | 1st week | 2nd week | 3th week | 4th week | No. of controls | Total no. of sampling events | |
| 2010 | 1 | 7 | 13 | 15 | 1 | 6 | 37 |
| 2011 | 34 | 10 | 16 | 27 | 20 | 19 | 107 |
| 2012 | 58 | 34 | 23 | 36 | 14 | 31 | 165 |
| total | 93 | 51 | 52 | 78 | 35 | 56 | 309 |
Comparisons of the effect of breeding stage on overall mosquito abundance using consecutive contrasts for Poisson GLMMs. The reported values show the mean differences in abundance between the corresponding breeding stage pairs (see also Figs. 2a, 3a)
| Species | Variable | Contrast levels | Difference in abundance | SE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Breeding stage | 1st week | 2.92 | 1.8 | 0.106 |
| 2nd week | 12.76 | 4.75 | 0.007 | ||
| 3rd week | -6.31 | 2.55 | 0.013 | ||
| 4th week | -4.64 | 1.98 | 0.02 | ||
|
| Breeding stage | 1st week | -0.25 | 0.322 | 0.43 |
| 2nd week | 0.11 | 0.21 | 0.58 | ||
| 3rd week | -0.05 | 0.18 | 0.77 | ||
| 4th week | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.25 |
Abbreviation: SE standard error
Fig. 2Model estimates (± 95% CI) of the effects of the breeding stage on the number of attracted (a) and proportion of blood filled mosquitoes (b) of Cx. pipiens individuals (see also Tables 2, 3). The values presented here were transformed for the corresponding response scale and calculated for mean brood size. The highest number of attracted mosquitoes was in the second week after hatching, and this also coincided with the peak of blood-feeding success
Comparisons of the effect of breeding stage on overall mosquito blood-feeding success using consecutive contrasts for Binomial GLMMs. The reported values show the differences in mean probabilities of blood-feeding success between the corresponding breeding stage pairs (see also Figs. 2b, 3b)
| Species | Variable | Contrast levels | Difference in blood-feeding success | SE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Breeding stage | 1st week | 0.034 | 0.01 | 0.031 |
| 2nd week | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.86 | ||
| 3rd week | -0.044 | 0.01 | < 0.001 | ||
| 4th week | 0.007 | 0.01 | 0.447 | ||
|
| Breeding stage | 2nd week | 0.021 | 0.02 | 0.48 |
| 3rd week | -0.065 | 0.02 | 0.001 | ||
| 4th week | 0.011 | 0.02 | 0.53 |
ablood-feeding success was not estimated during incubation due to sample size constraints
Abbreviation: SE standard error
Fig. 3Model estimates (± 95% CI) of the effects of the nestling age on the number of attracted (a) and proportion of blood filled mosquitoes (b) of Cx. modestus individuals (see also Tables 2,3). The values presented here were transformed for the corresponding response scale and calculated for mean brood size. Nestling age did not have a significant effect on the total number of attracted mosquitoes. However, blood-feeding success patterns peaked in the second week after hatching
Fig. 4ELISA OD ratios according to hatching order in broods where at least one ELISA-seropositive nestling was found. The black line shows a significant mean decrease in OD ratios (i.e. increase in antibody levels) according to LME model parameter estimate. The grey areas along the y axis depict ELISA classification categories as recommended by the manufacturer. Note that the OD ratio values were jittered along the x-axis. The results show that nestlings that hatched later (i.e. closer to the time of sampling) may have higher antibody levels