| Literature DB >> 28962228 |
Partha Pratim Saha1, Tanmoy Bhowmik1, Anjan Kumar Dasgupta2, Antony Gomes1.
Abstract
Research on nanoparticles has created interest among the biomedical scientists. Nanoparticle conjugation aims to target drug delivery, increase drug efficacy and imaging for better diagnosis. Toxicity profile of the nanoconjugated molecules has not been studied well. In this communication, the toxicity profile of snake venom cytotoxin (NKCT1), an antileukemic protein toxin, was evaluated after its conjugation with gold nanoparticle (GNP-NKCT1). Gold nanoparticle conjugation with NKCT1 was done with NaBH4 reduction method. The conjugated product GNP-NKCT1 was found less toxic than NKCT1 on isolated rat lymphocyte, mice peritoneal macrophage, in culture, which was evident from the MTT/Trypan blue assay. Peritoneal mast cell degranulation was in the order of NKCT1 > GNP-NKCT1. The in vitro cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity were increased in case of NKCT1 than GNP-NKCT1. On isolated kidney tissue, NKCT1 released significant amount of ALP and γ-GT than GNP-NKCT1. Gold nanoconjugation with NKCT1 also reduced the lethal activity in mice. In vivo acute/sub-chronic toxicity studies in mice showed significant increase in molecular markers due to NKCT1 treatment, which was reduced by gold nanoconjugation. Histopathology study showed decreased toxic effect of NKCT1 in kidney tissue after GNP conjugation. The present study confirmed that GNP conjugation significantly decreased the toxicity profile of NKCT1. Further studies are in progress to establish the molecular mechanism of GNP induced toxicity reduction.Entities:
Keywords: GNP conjugation; GNP-NKCT1; NKCT1; Naja kaouthia; Snake venom; Toxicity study
Year: 2014 PMID: 28962228 PMCID: PMC5598259 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2014.04.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1Effect of NKCT1 and GNP-NKCT1 on normal rat lymphocyte, mouse peritoneal macrophage cells. Cell count by (A) MTT assay and (B) by trypan blue exclusion assays. Each value represents quadruplicate samples of mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 as compared to control.
Fig. 2Effect of NKCT1 and GNP-NKCT1 on isolated guinea pig. (A and B) heart, (C and D) auricle, (E and F) rat phrenic nerve diaphragm, and (G and H) toad gastrocnemius sciatic nerve. Time scale in minute.
Fig. 3Effect of NKCT1 and GNP-NKCT1 on isolated rat phrenic nerve diaphragm (A and B) and toad gastrocnemius sciatic nerve (C and D). Time scale in minute.
Fig. 5Effect of GNP-NKCT1 and NKCT1 on kidney tissue, in vivo and in vitro study. Tissue stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Original magnifications 10×. (A–C) In vivo study with mice kidney tissue, where (A) denotes control tissue; (B) denotes NKCT1 treated tissue; (C) denotes GNP-NKCT1 treated tissue. (D–F) In vitro study with isolated rat kidney tissue, where (D) denotes control tissue; (E) denotes NKCT1 treated tissue; (F) denotes GNP-NKCT1 treated tissue. Arrows (↑) indicated the increased glomerular space and necrotic effect of NKCT1.
Fig. 4Effect of NKCT1 and GNP-NKCT1 on body weight gain of different mice groups.
Serum biochemical and haematological parameters after 15 and 30 days treatment.
| Animal groups | Serum biochemical parameters | Haematological parameters | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Creatinine (mg dl−1) | Urea (mg dl−1) | CK-MB (U L−1) | LDH (U L−1) | SGOT (U L−1) | SGPT (U L−1) | Total WBC (×1 mm3) | Total RBC (million mm3) | Hb (%) | ||
| 15 days | Group 1 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 27.3 ± 1.2 | 10.5 ± 0.4 | 163.23 ± 2.9 | 61.01 ± 2.2 | 22 ± 1.2 | 11.5 ± 0.7 | 9.4 ± 0.4 | 17.9 ± 1.2 |
| Group 2 | 1.23 ± 0.15 | 44.4 ± 3.7 | 19.02 ± 1.1 | 206.9 ± 24.3 | 66.63 ± 4.6 | 27.6 ± 1.5 | 11.2 ± 0.3 | 9.5 ± 0.5 | 18.3 ± 0.8 | |
| Group 3 | 0.78 ± 0.05 | 30.36 ± 2.18 | 11.9 ± 0.7 | 186.4 ± 11.1 | 51.83 ± 1.9 | 24.6 ± 2.1 | 10.7 ± 0.4 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | 18.1 ± 1.3 | |
| 30 days | Group 1 | 0.78 ± 0.05 | 27.9 ± 0.9 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 150.9 ± 3.7 | 58.8 ± 1.8 | 21.36 ± 0.8 | 10.4 ± 0.4 | 9.2 ± 0.8 | 18.5 ± 0.9 |
| Group 2 | 1.59 ± 0.17 | 63.38 ± 2.8 | 19.18 ± 0.9 | 225 ± 26.3 | 64.53 ± 2.7 | 26.2 ± 0.8 | 18.4 ± 0.4 | 8.8 ± 0.9 | 18.2 ± 1.3 | |
| Group 3 | 0.94 ± 0.09 | 34.47 ± 1.6 | 10.6 ± 0.4 | 176.9 ± 9.4 | 59.8 ± 1.8 | 21.83 ± 1 | 13.9 ± 0.2 | 9.01 ± 0.8 | 18.9 ± 0.6 | |
Data represent the mean ± SEM (n = 6).
P < 0.05 considered as significant level, when compared to sham control group (group 1: sham control, group 2: NKCT1 treated mice, group 3: GNP-NKCT1 treated mice).