Literature DB >> 28961548

Reliability and validity of a smartphone-based assessment of gait parameters across walking speed and smartphone locations: Body, bag, belt, hand, and pocket.

Patima Silsupadol1, Kunlanan Teja1, Vipul Lugade2.   

Abstract

The assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters is a useful clinical indicator of health status. Unfortunately, most assessment tools require controlled laboratory environments which can be expensive and time consuming. As smartphones with embedded sensors are becoming ubiquitous, this technology can provide a cost-effective, easily deployable method for assessing gait. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of a smartphone-based accelerometer in quantifying spatiotemporal gait parameters when attached to the body or in a bag, belt, hand, and pocket. Thirty-four healthy adults were asked to walk at self-selected comfortable, slow, and fast speeds over a 10-m walkway while carrying a smartphone. Step length, step time, gait velocity, and cadence were computed from smartphone-based accelerometers and validated with GAITRite. Across all walking speeds, smartphone data had excellent reliability (ICC2,1≥0.90) for the body and belt locations, with bag, hand, and pocket locations having good to excellent reliability (ICC2,1≥0.69). Correlations between the smartphone-based and GAITRite-based systems were very high for the body (r=0.89, 0.98, 0.96, and 0.87 for step length, step time, gait velocity, and cadence, respectively). Similarly, Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that the bias approached zero, particularly in the body, bag, and belt conditions under comfortable and fast speeds. Thus, smartphone-based assessments of gait are most valid when placed on the body, in a bag, or on a belt. The use of a smartphone to assess gait can provide relevant data to clinicians without encumbering the user and allow for data collection in the free-living environment.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Accelerometer; GAITRite; Gait; Smartphone; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28961548     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  26 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data.

Authors:  Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  Gait metrics analysis utilizing single-point inertial measurement units: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ralph Jasper Mobbs; Jordan Perring; Suresh Mahendra Raj; Monish Maharaj; Nicole Kah Mun Yoong; Luke Wicent Sy; Rannulu Dineth Fonseka; Pragadesh Natarajan; Wen Jie Choy
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2022-01-20

3.  A novel smartphone application is reliable for repeat administration and comparable to the Tekscan Strideway for spatiotemporal gait.

Authors:  Marie Kelly; Peter Jones; Ryan Wuebbles; Vipul Lugade; Daniel Cipriani; Nicholas G Murray
Journal:  Measurement (Lond)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.927

Review 4.  Towards real-world generalizability of a circuit for action-stopping.

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Claudicating patients with peripheral artery disease have meaningful improvement in walking speed after supervised exercise therapy.

Authors:  Hafizur Rahman; Iraklis I Pipinos; Jason M Johanning; George Casale; Mark A Williams; Jonathan R Thompson; Yohanis O'Neill-Castro; Sara A Myers
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Walking speed measurement technology: A review.

Authors:  Yohanna MejiaCruz; Jean Franco; Garret Hainline; Stacy Fritz; Zhaoshuo Jiang; Juan M Caicedo; Benjamin Davis; Victor Hirth
Journal:  Curr Geriatr Rep       Date:  2021-01-20

7.  Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change for a Smartphone-Based Motor-Cognitive Assessment: Implications for Concussion Management.

Authors:  David R Howell; Corrine N Seehusen; Mathew J Wingerson; Julie C Wilson; Robert C Lynall; Vipul Lugade
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.606

8.  A Comparative Study of Smartphone Game with Spirometry for Pulmonary Function Assessment in Stroke Patients.

Authors:  Sunghee Joo; Kyeongjin Lee; Changho Song
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Developing Smartphone-Based Objective Assessments of Physical Function in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: The PARADE Study.

Authors:  Valentin Hamy; Luis Garcia-Gancedo; Andrew Pollard; Anniek Myatt; Jingshu Liu; Andrew Howland; Philip Beineke; Emilia Quattrocchi; Rachel Williams; Michelle Crouthamel
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 10.  Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dylan Kobsar; Jesse M Charlton; Calvin T F Tse; Jean-Francois Esculier; Angelo Graffos; Natasha M Krowchuk; Daniel Thatcher; Michael A Hunt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.