Literature DB >> 32510034

Developing Smartphone-Based Objective Assessments of Physical Function in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: The PARADE Study.

Valentin Hamy1, Luis Garcia-Gancedo1, Andrew Pollard2, Anniek Myatt2, Jingshu Liu3, Andrew Howland3, Philip Beineke3, Emilia Quattrocchi4, Rachel Williams5, Michelle Crouthamel6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital biomarkers that measure physical activity and mobility are of great interest in the assessment of chronic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, as it provides insights on patients' quality of life that can be reliably compared across a whole population.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of analyzing iPhone sensor data collected remotely by means of a mobile software application in order to derive meaningful information on functional ability in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
METHODS: Two objective, active tasks were made available to the study participants: a wrist joint motion test and a walk test, both performed remotely and without any medical supervision. During these tasks, gyroscope and accelerometer time-series data were captured. Processing schemes were developed using machine learning techniques such as logistic regression as well as explicitly programmed algorithms to assess data quality in both tasks. Motion-specific features including wrist joint range of motion (ROM) in flexion-extension (for the wrist motion test) and gait parameters (for the walk test) were extracted from high quality data and compared with subjective pain and mobility parameters, separately captured via the application.
RESULTS: Out of 646 wrist joint motion samples collected, 289 (45%) were high quality. Data collected for the walk test included 2,583 samples (through 867 executions of the test) from which 651 (25%) were high quality. Further analysis of high-quality data highlighted links between reduced mobility and increased symptom severity. ANOVA testing showed statistically significant differences in wrist joint ROM between groups with light-moderate (220 participants) versus severe (36 participants) wrist pain (p < 0.001) as well as in average step times between groups with slight versus moderate problems walking about (p < 0.03).
CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate the potential to capture and quantify meaningful objective clinical information remotely using iPhone sensors and represent an early step towards the development of patient-centric digital endpoints for clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis.
Copyright © 2020 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gait; Machine learning; Range of motion; Rheumatoid arthritis; iPhone sensor

Year:  2020        PMID: 32510034      PMCID: PMC7250400          DOI: 10.1159/000506860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digit Biomark        ISSN: 2504-110X


  24 in total

1.  An enhanced estimate of initial contact and final contact instants of time using lower trunk inertial sensor data.

Authors:  John McCamley; Marco Donati; Eleni Grimpampi; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Values for function in rheumatoid arthritis: patients, professionals, and public.

Authors:  S Hewlett; A P Smith; J R Kirwan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M L Prevoo; M A van 't Hof; H H Kuper; M A van Leeuwen; L B van de Putte; P L van Riel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-01

4.  Objective assessment of abnormal gait in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a smartphone.

Authors:  Minoru Yamada; Tomoki Aoyama; Shuhei Mori; Shu Nishiguchi; Kazuya Okamoto; Tatsuaki Ito; Shinyo Muto; Tatsuya Ishihara; Hiroyuki Yoshitomi; Hiromu Ito
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Measuring the meaning of disability in rheumatoid arthritis: the Personal Impact Health Assessment Questionnaire (PI HAQ).

Authors:  S Hewlett; A P Smith; J R Kirwan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone® goniometric application for measuring active wrist range of motion: a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Pourahmadi; Ismail Ebrahimi Takamjani; Javad Sarrafzadeh; Mehrdad Bahramian; Mohammad Ali Mohseni-Bandpei; Fatemeh Rajabzadeh; Morteza Taghipour
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  A study on the measurement of wrist motion range using the iPhone 4 gyroscope application.

Authors:  Tae Seob Kim; David Dae Hwan Park; Young Bae Lee; Dong Gil Han; Jeong Su Shim; Young Jig Lee; Peter Chan Woo Kim
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Self-measured wrist range of motion by wrist-injured and wrist-healthy study participants using a built-in iPhone feature as compared with a universal goniometer.

Authors:  Jacob Modest; Brian Clair; Robin DeMasi; Stacy Meulenaere; Anthony Howley; Michelle Aubin; Marci Jones
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 1.950

9.  Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study.

Authors:  M F Janssen; A Simon Pickard; Dominik Golicki; Claire Gudex; Maciej Niewada; Luciana Scalone; Paul Swinburn; Jan Busschbach
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Evaluation of smartphone-based testing to generate exploratory outcome measures in a phase 1 Parkinson's disease clinical trial.

Authors:  Florian Lipsmeier; Kirsten I Taylor; Timothy Kilchenmann; Detlef Wolf; Alf Scotland; Jens Schjodt-Eriksen; Wei-Yi Cheng; Ignacio Fernandez-Garcia; Juliane Siebourg-Polster; Liping Jin; Jay Soto; Lynne Verselis; Frank Boess; Martin Koller; Michael Grundman; Andreas U Monsch; Ronald B Postuma; Anirvan Ghosh; Thomas Kremer; Christian Czech; Christian Gossens; Michael Lindemann
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 10.338

View more
  6 in total

1.  The Path Forward for Digital Measures: Suppressing the Desire to Compare Apples and Pineapples.

Authors:  Carrie R Houts; Bray Patrick-Lake; Ieuan Clay; R J Wirth
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2020-11-26

2.  Dorsal Finger Fold Recognition by Convolutional Neural Networks for the Detection and Monitoring of Joint Swelling in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Thomas Hügle; Leo Caratsch; Matteo Caorsi; Jules Maglione; Diana Dan; Alexandre Dumusc; Marc Blanchard; Gabriel Kalweit; Maria Kalweit
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Smartphone-based behavioral monitoring and patient-reported outcomes in adults with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth Mollard; Sofia Pedro; Rebecca Schumacher; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 4.  Smartphones for musculoskeletal research - hype or hope? Lessons from a decennium of mHealth studies.

Authors:  Anna L Beukenhorst; Katie L Druce; Diederik De Cock
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 5.  Evaluation, Acceptance, and Qualification of Digital Measures: From Proof of Concept to Endpoint.

Authors:  Jennifer C Goldsack; Ariel V Dowling; David Samuelson; Bray Patrick-Lake; Ieuan Clay
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-03-23

6.  A Thorough Examination of Morning Activity Patterns in Adults with Arthritis and Healthy Controls Using Actigraphy Data.

Authors:  Alison Keogh; Niladri Sett; Seamas Donnelly; Ronan Mullan; Diana Gheta; Martina Maher-Donnelly; Vittorio Illiano; Francesc Calvo; Jonas F Dorn; Brian Mac Namee; Brian Caulfield
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2020-09-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.