Literature DB >> 28960244

Case-only approach to identifying markers predicting treatment effects on the relative risk scale.

James Y Dai1, C Jason Liang2, Michael LeBlanc1, Ross L Prentice1, Holly Janes3.   

Abstract

Retrospectively measuring markers on stored baseline samples from participants in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) may provide high quality evidence as to the value of the markers for treatment selection. Originally developed for approximating gene-environment interactions in the odds ratio scale, the case-only method has recently been advocated for assessing gene-treatment interactions on rare disease endpoints in randomized clinical trials. In this article, the case-only approach is shown to provide a consistent and efficient estimator of marker by treatment interactions and marker-specific treatment effects on the relative risk scale. The prohibitive rare-disease assumption is no longer needed, broadening the utility of the case-only approach. The case-only method is resource-efficient as markers only need to be measured in cases only. It eliminates the need to model the marker's main effect, and can be used with any parametric or nonparametric learning method. The utility of this approach is illustrated by an application to genetic data in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy trial.
© 2017, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene-treatment interaction; High-dimensional data; Individual Treatment effect; Precision medicine; Predictive biomarker; Treatment selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28960244      PMCID: PMC5874156          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  42 in total

Review 1.  Uses and abuses of tumor markers in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006-06

Review 2.  Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Daniel J Sargent; Barbara A Conley; Carmen Allegra; Laurence Collette
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population-based case-control studies.

Authors:  W W Piegorsch; C R Weinberg; J A Taylor
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Design of the Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. The Women's Health Initiative Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1998-02

5.  Evaluating marker-guided treatment selection strategies.

Authors:  Roland A Matsouaka; Junlong Li; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Effect of oestrogen plus progestin on the incidence of diabetes in postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative Hormone Trial.

Authors:  K L Margolis; D E Bonds; R J Rodabough; L Tinker; L S Phillips; C Allen; T Bassford; G Burke; J Torrens; B V Howard
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Variation in the FGFR2 gene and the effect of a low-fat dietary pattern on invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice; Ying Huang; David A Hinds; Ulrike Peters; David R Cox; Erica Beilharz; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jacques E Rossouw; Bette Caan; Dennis G Ballinger
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Holly Janes; Ying Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  An approach to evaluating and comparing biomarkers for patient treatment selection.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Marshall D Brown; Ying Huang; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

10.  Genetic variants in the MRPS30 region and postmenopausal breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Dennis G Ballinger; James Y Dai; Ulrike Peters; David A Hinds; David R Cox; Erica Beilharz; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jacques E Rossouw; Anne McTiernan; Thomas Rohan; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  4 in total

1.  Case-only Methods Identified Genetic Loci Predicting a Subgroup of Men with Reduced Risk of High-grade Prostate Cancer by Finasteride.

Authors:  James Y Dai; Michael LeBlanc; Phyllis J Goodman; M Scott Lucia; Ian M Thompson; Catherine M Tangen
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2018-12-11

2.  Case-only trees and random forests for exploring genotype-specific treatment effects in randomized clinical trials with dichotomous endpoints.

Authors:  James Y Dai; Michael LeBlanc
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 1.864

3.  Gene-Environment Interaction between Arg72Pro SNP and Selected Environmental Exposures among Brazilian Women Diagnosed with Benign Breast Disease.

Authors:  Rafaela Soares Senra Da Costa; Rosalina Jorge Koifman; Viviane Ferreira Esteves; Marla Presa Raulino Schilling; Sergio Koifman; Ilce Ferreira Da Silva
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-12-01

4.  Case-only approach applied in environmental epidemiology: 2 examples of interaction effect using the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) datasets.

Authors:  Jinyoung Moon; Hwan-Cheol Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.612

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.