Literature DB >> 2895801

A prospective randomized phase III trial comparing combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil, and either doxorubicin or epirubicin. French Epirubicin Study Group.

.   

Abstract

Two hundred sixty-three patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized to two treatment regimens consisting of fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2; cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2; and either epirubicin (Farmorubicin, Farmitalia Carlo Erba SpA, Italy), 50 mg/m2 (FEC); or doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), 50 mg/m2 (FAC), administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Two hundred thirty patients (FAC, 113; FEC, 117) were evaluable for response, and 244 patients for toxicity (FAC, 120; FEC, 124). The two groups were comparable with respect to age, menopausal status, disease-free interval to first recurrence, time from initial diagnosis to protocol activation, indicator lesions, performance status, and prior adjuvant therapy. Of 117 evaluable patients treated with FEC, 59 (50.4%) had a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR), 40 showed no change (NC), and 18 had progressive disease. Of 113 evaluable patients treated with FAC, 54 (52%) showed a remission, 30 NC, and 18 progression. There was no statistical difference between the two regimens in overall response rate, response rate according to tumor site, time to response, or duration of response. Median survival was 15 months for FEC and 18.2 months for FAC (not significant). In the 120 patients evaluable for toxicity treated with FAC, three episodes of congestive heart failure (CHF) were observed after 225, 350, and 550 mg/m2 of doxorubicin, respectively. Of the 124 evaluable patients treated with FEC, 25 received greater than 600 mg/m2 of epirubicin and no CHF was recorded. FEC induced significantly less neutropenia (P = .01), less nausea and vomiting (P less than .01), and less complete alopecia (P less than 10(-3) than did FAC. The results of this study demonstrate that FEC is as effective a regimen as FAC for the therapy of advanced breast cancer. Moreover, FEC was better tolerated than FAC in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2895801     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.4.679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

Review 1.  Systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  H T Mouridsen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Cardiovascular complications of breast cancer therapy in older adults.

Authors:  Chetan Shenoy; Igor Klem; Anna Lisa Crowley; Manesh R Patel; Mark A Winchester; Cynthia Owusu; Gretchen G Kimmick
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-07-07

Review 3.  Epirubicin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  G L Plosker; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  A critique of the role of the blood-brain barrier in the chemotherapy of human brain tumors.

Authors:  D J Stewart
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Cardiotoxicity of anthracycline agents for the treatment of cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Lesley A Smith; Victoria R Cornelius; Christopher J Plummer; Gill Levitt; Mark Verrill; Peter Canney; Alison Jones
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Epirubicin cardiotoxicity: a study comparing low- with high-dose-intensity weekly schedules.

Authors:  G J Berchem; F Ries; J Hanfelt; C Duhem; M Keipes; C Delagardelle; M Dicato
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Premenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Preliminary results of a randomised trial comparing 3 adjuvant regimens: FEC 50 x 6 cycles vs FEC 50 x 3 cycles vs FEC 75 x 3 cycles. The French Adjuvant Study Group.

Authors:  P Fumoleau; Y Devaux; M L Vo Van; P Kerbrat; P Fargeot; S Schraub; J Mihura; M Namer; M Mercier
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Anthracyclines in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  M Namer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Postmenopausal patients with node-positive resectable breast cancer. Tamoxifen vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) vs FEC 50 (6 cycles) plus tamoxifen vs control--preliminary results of a 4-arm randomised trial. The French Adjuvant Study Group.

Authors:  J P Gérard; M Héry; D Gedouin; A Monnier; M J Goudier; J P Jacquin; F Plat; E Cabarrot; D Serin; M Namer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Epirubicin. Clinical pharmacology and dose-effect relationship.

Authors:  J Robert
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.