Literature DB >> 1283847

Systemic therapy of advanced breast cancer.

H T Mouridsen1.   

Abstract

Many cytotoxic agents have demonstrated activity in advanced breast cancer, the more active agents being cyclophosphamide and the anthracyclines doxorubicin and epirubicin. Combinations of drugs are generally superior to single agents in terms of response rate, duration of response and survival. The treatment of advanced breast cancer can be continued either until treatment failure, or for a limited time from either initiation of therapy or from the observation of complete response. Although these are issues of significant concern, data from randomised trials are limited, and so the question of optimal treatment duration remains open. Randomised trials comparing regimens that differ by a dose intensity factor of less than 2 have failed to demonstrate significant differences in efficacy between the dose levels. With higher doses, as applied in combination with colony-stimulating factors and bone marrow transplantation, response rates seem to increase, but whether this translates into improved survival has not yet been answered by the results of randomised trials. Approximately 30% of patients respond to endocrine therapy. From the results of randomised trials, which have compared the efficacies and toxicities of different endocrine modalities including combined endocrine therapy, single-agent tamoxifen is generally considered as the preferred first-line treatment, leaving progestins and aromatase inhibitors as alternatives for second-line endocrine therapy in responders. In the majority of trials, chemotherapy combined with endocrine therapy has given improved response rates compared with chemotherapy alone, but the differences have not generally been translated into prolonged survival with combined modalities. This gives rise to the question of the optimal sequence of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, a subject needing further evaluation in future trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1283847     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199200444-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  66 in total

1.  Integration of chemotherapy into combined modality treatment of solid tumors VII. Adenocarcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  S K Carter
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 12.111

2.  Controlled evaluation of adriamycin (NSC-123127) in patients with disseminated breast cancer.

Authors:  D L Ahmann; H F Bisel; R T Eagan; J H Edmonson; R G Hahn
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1974 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Aminoglutethimide in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  R C Stuart-Harris; I E Smith
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 4.  Dose-response in the treatment of breast cancer: a critical review.

Authors:  I C Henderson; D F Hayes; R Gelman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A randomized multicenter trial comparing mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and fluorouracil in the therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma.

Authors:  J M Bennett; H B Muss; J H Doroshow; S Wolff; E T Krementz; K Cartwright; G Dukart; A Reisman; I Schoch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Comparison of CAF versus CMFP in metastatic breast cancer: analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  F J Cummings; R Gelman; J Horton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A phase III clinical trial comparing the combination cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, cisplatin with cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, prednisone in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  E T Creagan; S J Green; D L Ahmann; J N Ingle; J H Edmonson; R F Marschke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Randomized trial of low- versus high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate in the induction treatment of postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  F Cavalli; A Goldhirsch; F Jungi; G Martz; P Alberto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Adriamycin versus methotrexate in five-drug combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  H B Muss; D R White; F Richards; M R Cooper; J J Stuart; D V Jackson; L Rhyne; C L Spurr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Goserelin, a depot gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of premenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer. German Zoladex Trial Group.

Authors:  M Kaufmann; W Jonat; U Kleeberg; W Eiermann; F Jänicke; J Hilfrich; R Kreienberg; M Albrecht; H K Weitzel; H Schmid
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  18 in total

1.  Increased expression of P-glycoprotein is associated with doxorubicin chemoresistance in the metastatic 4T1 breast cancer model.

Authors:  Lili Bao; Aliyya Haque; Kamilah Jackson; Sidhartha Hazari; Krzysztof Moroz; Rachna Jetly; Srikanta Dash
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Anthracyclines in the treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  H T Mouridsen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  A risk-benefit assessment of anthracycline antibiotics in antineoplastic therapy.

Authors:  R Abraham; R L Basser; M D Green
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Docetaxel: an update of its use in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  D P Figgitt; L R Wiseman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Cost effectiveness of letrozole in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women in the UK.

Authors:  M Nuijten; L Meester; F Waibel; S Wait
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  A new decision model for cost-utility comparisons of chemotherapy in recurrent metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J Hutton; R Brown; M Borowitz; K Abrams; M Rothman; A Shakespeare
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Paclitaxel. An update of its use in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and ovarian and other gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Vinorelbine. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  K L Goa; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Tumour molecular subtyping according to hormone receptors and HER2 status defines different pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz; Ana María García-Tapiador; Esther Martínez-Ortega; Rosario Dueñas-García; Ana Jaén-Morago; Ana Laura Ortega-Granados; Mónica Fernández-Navarro; Capilla de la Torre-Cabrera; Basilio Dueñas; Ana Isabel Rueda; Francisco Morales; César Ramírez-Torosa; María Dolores Martín-Salvago; Pedro Sánchez-Rovira
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Docetaxel and epirubicin salvage regimen in relapsed anthracycline-sensitive metastatic breast cancer patients after anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Jae Hong Seo; Hwa Jung Sung; Kyong Hwa Park; In Keun Choi; Sang Cheul Oh; Sang Won Shin; Yeul Hong Kim; Jun Suk Kim; Ae-Ree Kim; Jae-Bok Lee; Bum Hwan Koo
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.850

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.