S Temam1, J Spicer2, F Farzaneh3, J C Soria4, D Oppenheim3, M McGurk5, A Hollebecque4, J Sarini6, K Hussain7, S Soehrman Brossard8, L Manenti9, S Evers9, P Delmar8, L Di Scala8, C Mancao8, F Feuerhake10, L Andries11, M G Ott8, A Passioukov9, J P Delord12. 1. Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: stephane.temam@gustaveroussy.fr. 2. Division of Cancer Studies. 3. Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. 4. DITEP (Drug Development Department), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France. 5. Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 6. Department of Surgery, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France. 7. Head and Neck Surgery, King's College London, Guy's Hospital Campus, London, UK. 8. Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel. 9. Roche Innovation Center Zurich, Schlieren, Switzerland. 10. Institute for Pathology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover; Institute for Neuropathology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany. 11. HistoGeneX, Antwerpen, Belgium. 12. Clinical Research Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In addition to inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling, anti-EGFR antibodies of the IgG1 'subtype' can induce a complementary therapeutic effect through the induction of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Glycoengineering of therapeutic antibodies increases the affinity for the Fc-gamma receptor, thereby enhancing ADCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated the changes in immune effector cells and EGFR pathway biomarkers in 44 patients with operable, advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with two preoperative doses of either glycoengineered imgatuzumab (GA201; 700 or 1400 mg) or cetuximab (standard dosing) in a neoadjuvant setting with paired pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies. RESULTS: Significant antitumor activity was observed with both antibodies after just two infusions. Metabolic responses were seen in 23 (59.0%) patients overall. One imgatuzumab-treated patient (700 mg) achieved a 'pathological' complete response. An immediate and sustained decrease in peripheral natural killer cells was consistently observed with the first imgatuzumab infusion but not with cetuximab. The functionality of the remaining peripheral natural killer cells was maintained. Similarly, a pronounced increase in circulating cytokines was seen following the first infusion of imgatuzumab but not cetuximab. Overall, tumor-infiltrating CD3+ cell counts increased following treatment with both antibodies. A significant increase from baseline in CD3+/perforin+ cytotoxic T cells occurred only in the 700-mg imgatuzumab group (median 95% increase, P < 0.05). The most prominent decrease of EGFR-expressing cells was recorded after treatment with imgatuzumab (700 mg, -34.6%; 1400 mg, -41.8%). The post-treatment inflammatory tumor microenvironment was strongly related to baseline tumor-infiltrating immune cell density, and baseline levels of EGFR and pERK in tumor cells most strongly predicted therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: These pharmacodynamic observations and relationship with efficacy are consistent with the proposed mode of action of imgatuzumab combining efficient EGFR pathway inhibition with ADCC-related immune antitumor effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01046266 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
BACKGROUND: In addition to inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling, anti-EGFR antibodies of the IgG1 'subtype' can induce a complementary therapeutic effect through the induction of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Glycoengineering of therapeutic antibodies increases the affinity for the Fc-gamma receptor, thereby enhancing ADCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated the changes in immune effector cells and EGFR pathway biomarkers in 44 patients with operable, advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with two preoperative doses of either glycoengineered imgatuzumab (GA201; 700 or 1400 mg) or cetuximab (standard dosing) in a neoadjuvant setting with paired pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies. RESULTS: Significant antitumor activity was observed with both antibodies after just two infusions. Metabolic responses were seen in 23 (59.0%) patients overall. One imgatuzumab-treated patient (700 mg) achieved a 'pathological' complete response. An immediate and sustained decrease in peripheral natural killer cells was consistently observed with the first imgatuzumab infusion but not with cetuximab. The functionality of the remaining peripheral natural killer cells was maintained. Similarly, a pronounced increase in circulating cytokines was seen following the first infusion of imgatuzumab but not cetuximab. Overall, tumor-infiltrating CD3+ cell counts increased following treatment with both antibodies. A significant increase from baseline in CD3+/perforin+ cytotoxic T cells occurred only in the 700-mg imgatuzumab group (median 95% increase, P < 0.05). The most prominent decrease of EGFR-expressing cells was recorded after treatment with imgatuzumab (700 mg, -34.6%; 1400 mg, -41.8%). The post-treatment inflammatory tumor microenvironment was strongly related to baseline tumor-infiltrating immune cell density, and baseline levels of EGFR and pERK in tumor cells most strongly predicted therapeutic response. CONCLUSIONS: These pharmacodynamic observations and relationship with efficacy are consistent with the proposed mode of action of imgatuzumab combining efficient EGFR pathway inhibition with ADCC-related immune antitumor effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01046266 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Keywords:
GA201; antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity; cetuximab; imgatuzumab; squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Authors: Virginie Frings; Adrianus J de Langen; Egbert F Smit; Floris H P van Velden; Otto S Hoekstra; Harm van Tinteren; Ronald Boellaard Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Robert Pirker; Jose R Pereira; Joachim von Pawel; Maciej Krzakowski; Rodryg Ramlau; Keunchil Park; Filippo de Marinis; Wilfried E E Eberhardt; Luis Paz-Ares; Stephan Störkel; Karl-Maria Schumacher; Anja von Heydebreck; Ilhan Celik; Kenneth J O'Byrne Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Christian A Gerdes; Valeria Gonzalez Nicolini; Sylvia Herter; Erwin van Puijenbroek; Sabine Lang; Michaela Roemmele; Ekkehard Moessner; Olivier Freytag; Thomas Friess; Carola H Ries; Birgit Bossenmaier; Hans Joachim Mueller; Pablo Umaña Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: John P Giddens; Joseph V Lomino; David J DiLillo; Jeffrey V Ravetch; Lai-Xi Wang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Susanne Wingert; Uwe Reusch; Stefan Knackmuss; Michael Kluge; Michael Damrat; Jens Pahl; Ute Schniegler-Mattox; Thomas Mueller; Ivica Fucek; Kristina Ellwanger; Michael Tesar; Torsten Haneke; Joachim Koch; Martin Treder; Wolfgang Fischer; Erich Rajkovic Journal: MAbs Date: 2021 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 5.857