Literature DB >> 22056021

EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study.

Robert Pirker1, Jose R Pereira, Joachim von Pawel, Maciej Krzakowski, Rodryg Ramlau, Keunchil Park, Filippo de Marinis, Wilfried E E Eberhardt, Luis Paz-Ares, Stephan Störkel, Karl-Maria Schumacher, Anja von Heydebreck, Ilhan Celik, Kenneth J O'Byrne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Findings from the phase 3 First-Line ErbituX in lung cancer (FLEX) study showed that the addition of cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0·871, 95% CI 0·762-0·996; p=0·044) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To define patients benefiting most from cetuximab, we studied the association of tumour EGFR expression level with clinical outcome in FLEX study patients.
METHODS: We used prospectively collected tumour EGFR expression data to generate an immunohistochemistry score for FLEX study patients on a continuous scale of 0-300. We used response data to select an outcome-based discriminatory threshold immunohistochemistry score for EGFR expression of 200. Treatment outcome was analysed in patients with low (immunohistochemistry score <200) and high (≥200) tumour EGFR expression. The primary endpoint in the FLEX study was overall survival. We analysed patients from the FLEX intention-to-treat (ITT) population. The FLEX study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00148798.
FINDINGS: Tumour EGFR immunohistochemistry data were available for 1121 of 1125 (99·6%) patients from the FLEX study ITT population. High EGFR expression was scored for 345 (31%) evaluable patients and low for 776 (69%) patients. For patients in the high EGFR expression group, overall survival was longer in the chemotherapy plus cetuximab group than in the chemotherapy alone group (median 12·0 months [95% CI 10·2-15·2] vs 9·6 months [7·6-10·6]; HR 0·73, 0·58-0·93; p=0·011), with no meaningful increase in side-effects. We recorded no corresponding survival benefit for patients in the low EGFR expression group (median 9·8 months [8·9-12·2] vs 10·3 months [9·2-11·5]; HR 0·99, 0·84-1·16; p=0·88). A treatment interaction test assessing the difference in the HRs for overall survival between the EGFR expression groups suggested a predictive value for EGFR expression (p=0·044).
INTERPRETATION: High EGFR expression is a tumour biomarker that can predict survival benefit from the addition of cetuximab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Assessment of EGFR expression could offer a personalised treatment approach in this setting. FUNDING: Merck KGaA.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22056021     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70318-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  230 in total

1.  7th annual European Antibody Congress 2011: November 29-December 1, 2011, Geneva, Switzerland.

Authors:  Alexey A Lugovskoy; Janice M Reichert; Alain Beck
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  Genetic changes in squamous cell lung cancer: a review.

Authors:  Rebecca S Heist; Lecia V Sequist; Jeffrey A Engelman
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 3.  Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current concepts and clinical trials.

Authors:  Marissa Mayor; Neng Yang; Daniel Sterman; David R Jones; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Targeted therapies for locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Thomas E Stinchcombe
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-12

5.  Rapamycin enhances cetuximab cytotoxicity by inhibiting mTOR-mediated drug resistance in mesenchymal hepatoma cells.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Qi-Da Hu; Xue-Feng Xia; Chao Liang; Hao Liu; Qi Zhang; Tao Ma; Feng Liang; Ting-Bo Liang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  IL-22(+)CD4(+) T cells promote colorectal cancer stemness via STAT3 transcription factor activation and induction of the methyltransferase DOT1L.

Authors:  Ilona Kryczek; Yanwei Lin; Nisha Nagarsheth; Dongjun Peng; Lili Zhao; Ende Zhao; Linda Vatan; Wojciech Szeliga; Yali Dou; Scott Owens; Witold Zgodzinski; Marek Majewski; Grzegorz Wallner; Jingyuan Fang; Emina Huang; Weiping Zou
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 31.745

7.  Gene copy number gain of EGFR is a poor prognostic biomarker in gastric cancer: evaluation of 855 patients with bright-field dual in situ hybridization (DISH) method.

Authors:  Eiji Higaki; Takeshi Kuwata; Akiko Kawano Nagatsuma; Yasunori Nishida; Takahiro Kinoshita; Masaki Aizawa; Hiroaki Nitta; Masato Nagino; Atsushi Ochiai
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  ARRY-334543 reverses multidrug resistance by antagonizing the activity of ATP-binding cassette subfamily G member 2.

Authors:  De-Shen Wang; Atish Patel; Hong-May Sim; Yun-Kai Zhang; Yi-Jun Wang; Rishil J Kathawala; Hui Zhang; Tanaji T Talele; Suresh V Ambudkar; Rui-Hua Xu; Zhe-Sheng Chen
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.429

9.  The continuing role of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Wan Ling Tan; Quan-Sing Ng
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02

Review 10.  Precision Oncology Medicine: The Clinical Relevance of Patient-Specific Biomarkers Used to Optimize Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Keith T Schmidt; Cindy H Chau; Douglas K Price; William D Figg
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.126

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.