| Literature DB >> 28949414 |
Shiraz Ahmad1, Haseeb Valli1, Samantha C Salvage2, Andrew A Grace2, Kamalan Jeevaratnam1,3,4, Christopher L-H Huang1,2.
Abstract
Increasing evidence implicates chronic energetic dysfunction in human cardiac arrhythmias. Mitochondrial impairment through Pgc-1β knockout is known to produce a murine arrhythmic phenotype. However, the cumulative effect of this with advancing age and its electrocardiographic basis have not been previously studied. Young (12-16 weeks) and aged (>52 weeks), wild type (WT) (n = 5 and 8) and Pgc-1β-/- (n = 9 and 6), mice were anaesthetised and used for electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings. Time intervals separating successive ECG deflections were analysed for differences between groups before and after β1-adrenergic (intraperitoneal dobutamine 3 mg/kg) challenge. Heart rates before dobutamine challenge were indistinguishable between groups. The Pgc-1β-/- genotype however displayed compromised nodal function in response to adrenergic challenge. This manifested as an impaired heart rate response suggesting a functional defect at the level of the sino-atrial node, and a negative dromotropic response suggesting an atrioventricular conduction defect. Incidences of the latter were most pronounced in the aged Pgc-1β-/- mice. Moreover, Pgc-1β-/- mice displayed electrocardiographic features consistent with the existence of a pro-arrhythmic substrate. Firstly, ventricular activation was prolonged in these mice consistent with slowed action potential conduction and is reported here for the first time. Additionally, Pgc-1β-/- mice had shorter repolarisation intervals. These were likely attributable to altered K+ conductance properties, ultimately resulting in a shortened QTc interval, which is also known to be associated with increased arrhythmic risk. ECG analysis thus yielded electrophysiological findings bearing on potential arrhythmogenicity in intact Pgc-1β-/- systems in widespread cardiac regions.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac arrhythmias; cardiac conduction; electrocardiogram, ECG; peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ-coactivator-1 (PGC-1)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28949414 PMCID: PMC5814877 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.12863
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol ISSN: 0305-1870 Impact factor: 2.557
Figure 2Typical ECG records from Pgc‐1β heart illustrating (A) normal sinus rhythm; (B) ectopic beat; (C) atrioventricular (AV) dissociation; records obtained from the same mouse. Arrows indicate timings of P‐waves (D) pre‐dobutamine and (E) following dobutamine challenge with ECG showing ST depression
Figure 1Typical ECG and definition of deflections used in quantitative analysis (A) start of P‐wave; (B) P‐wave trough/end of P‐wave; (C) start of QRS complex; (D) R wave peak; (E) trough of S wave; (F) peak of R' deflection; (G) C wave peak; (H) trough or end of C wave. The corrected QT interval, QTc is taken as the interval from C to H and corrected for RR intervals52
Incidence of particular electrocardiographic features in the experimental groups
| WT |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | Aged | Young | Aged | |
| (A) Ischaemic change | ||||
| Ischaemic changes present | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Ischaemic changes absent | 5 | 6 | 9 | 4 |
| (B) Arrhythmic ECG patterns | ||||
| Sinus rhythm only | 5 | 4 | 8 | 3 |
| Isorhythmic AV dissociation | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Ectopic beats | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Electrocardiographic records obtained at baseline prior to pharmacological intervention in young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 8), young Pgc‐1β (n = 9) and aged Pgc‐1β (n = 6).
Figure 3Traces plotting heart rate response curves before and following dobutamine challenge in (A) young WT, (B) aged WT; (C) young Pgc‐1β and (D) aged Pgc‐1β mouse
Figure 4Correlations between heart rates observed pre‐ vs post‐dobutamine challenge in Pgc‐1β and WT
Electrocardiographic features related to sino‐atrial, atrio‐ventricular and atrial conduction
| WT |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | Aged | Young | Aged | |
| (A) Heart rate response | ||||
| Mean heart rate prior to dobutamine challenge (Hz) | 6.29 ± 0.15 | 7.08 ± 0.16 | 6.32 ± 0.38 | 6.81 ± 0.59 |
| Mean heart rate following dobutamine challenge (Hz) | 9.10 ± 0.19 | 9.12 ± 0.15 | 8.33 ± 0.40 | 8.25 ± 0.39 |
| Peak heart rate following dobutamine challenge (Hz) | 9.32 ± 0.21 | 9.66 ± 0.32 | 8.51 ± 0.40 | 8.41 ± 0.39 |
| (B) Atrial conduction | ||||
| P‐wave duration prior to dobutamine challenge (ms) | 26.08 ± 0.50 | 25.57 ± 1.06 | 26.06 ± 0.47 | 27.64 ± 0.67 |
| P‐wave duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 25.43 ± 0.58 | 26.08 ± 0.79 | 26.21 ± 0.48 | 26.90 ± 0.86 |
| (C) AV conduction | ||||
| Mean PR interval prior to dobutamine challenge (ms) | 54.20 ± 2.57 | 63.26 ± 4.89 | 56.35 ± 5.56 | 66.62 ± 4.25 |
| Mean PR interval following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 52.53 ± 2.22 | 53.61 ± 2.76 | 58.38 ± 5.41 | 76.95 ± 9.54 |
| Hearts showing decreased PR interval following dobutamine challenge | 5 of 5 | 6 of 6 | 5 of 9 | 1 of 6 |
| Hearts showing increased PR interval following dobutamine challenge | 0 of 5 | 0 of 6 | 4 of 9 | 5 of 6 |
Electrocardiographic features gave (A) heart rates responses in studies of young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 8), young Pgc‐1β (n = 9) and aged Pgc‐1β mice (n = 6), in which two of the aged WT showed AV dissociation within the ECG analysis window. Studies of atrial (B) and AV (C) conduction were therefore based on young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 6), young Pgc‐1β (n = 9) and aged Pgc‐1β mice (n = 6) respectively.
Figure 5Mean heart rates in the 5 minute analysis window before and after dobutamine administration in young and aged WT and Pgc‐1β mice
Figure 6(A, B) Poincare plots pre‐ (A) and post‐dobutamine (B) in young (a,b) and aged (c,d), WT (a,c) and Pgc‐1β‐/‐ hearts (b,d) and (C, D) the standard deviations (SDs) of their ΔRR intervals before (C) and following dobutamine challenge (D)
Figure 7PR intervals reflecting paradoxical AV dysfunction before and following dobutamine challenge in (A) young WT and (B) aged Pgc‐1β mouse
Electrocardiographic activation intervals
| WT |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | Aged | Young | Aged | |
| QR duration before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 6.85 ± 0.67 | 5.89 ± 0.63 | 6.20 ± 0.48 | 8.35 ± 0.52 |
| QR duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 7.14 ± 0.75 | 6.12 ± 0.60 | 6.12 ± 0.48 | 8.56 ± 0.56 |
| QS duration before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 10.19 ± 0.47 | 9.43 ± 0.45 | 9.67 ± 0.45 | 11.78 ± 0.7 |
| QS duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 10.60 ± 0.62 | 9.76 ± 0.40 | 9.91 ± 0.43 | 12.07 ± 0.77 |
| QR' duration before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 14.24 ± 0.60 | 14.22 ± 0.40 | 13.82 ± 0.34 | 16.20 ± 0.92 |
| QR' duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 14.95 ± 0.41 | 14.39 ± 0.55 | 14.15 ± 0.38 | 16.72 ± 0.89 |
Electrocardiographic measurements made in QR, QS and QR' durations before and following dobutamine challenge in young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 8), young Pgc‐1β (n = 9) and aged Pgc‐1β mice (n = 6).
Electrocardiographic recovery intervals
| WT |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | Aged | Young | Aged | |
| RTc duration before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 29.00 ± 0.54 | 30.60 ± 0.87 | 28.51 ± 1.05 | 28.89 ± 0.87 |
| RTc duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 33.43 ± 0.77 | 33.75 ± 0.44 | 31.41 ± 0.86 | 31.79 ± 0.41 |
| R'Tc duration before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 23.15 ± 0.45 | 23.64 ± 0.71 | 22.55 ± 0.91 | 22.55 ± 0.56 |
| R'Tc duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 25.97 ± 0.43 | 25.88 ± 0.55 | 24.16 ± 0.66 | 24.40 ± 0.29 |
| STc duration before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 26.35 ± 0.38 | 27.65 ± 0.77 | 25.79 ± 0.92 | 26.06 ± 0.55 |
| STc duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 30.13 ± 0.68 | 30.31 ± 0.50 | 28.00 ± 0.71 | 28.40 ± 0.30 |
Electrocardiographic measurements made in RTc, R'Tc and STc durations before and following dobutamine challenge in young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 8), young Pgc‐1β (n = 9) and aged Pgc‐1β (n = 6) mice. One young and one aged Pgc‐1β mouse were excluded as these showed paradoxical dromotropic effects that lead to prolonged PR intervals and P waves that interfered with determinations of the end of the C wave to give the following n values: young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 8), young Pgc‐1β (n = 8) and aged Pgc‐1β (n = 5).
Electrocardiographic recovery intervals: WT and Pgc1β compared
| WT |
| |
|---|---|---|
| RTc duration before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 29.99 ± 0.60 | 28.65 ± 0.70 |
| RTc duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 33.63 ± 0.38 | 31.53 ± 0.57 |
| R'Tc duration before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 23.45 ± 0.46 | 22.55 ± 0.58 |
| R'Tc duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 25.91 ± 0.37 | 24.24 ± 0.44 |
| STc duration before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 27.15 ± 0.51 | 25.89 ± 0.59 |
| STc duration following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 30.24 ± 0.39 | 28.13 ± 0.48 |
Electrocardiographic measurements made in RTc, R'Tc and STc durations before and following dobutamine challenge in young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 8), young Pgc‐1β (n = 9) and aged Pgc‐1β mouse (n = 6). One young and one aged Pgc‐1β mouse were excluded as these showed paradoxical dromotropic effects that led to prolonged PR intervals and P waves that interfered with determinations of the end of the C wave to give the following n values: young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 8), young Pgc‐1β (n = 8) and aged Pgc‐1β (n = 5). This gave total n values of WT and Pgc‐1β of 13 in both cases.
Mean electrocardiographic QTc durations
| WT |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | Aged | Young | Aged | |
| Mean QTc before dobutamine challenge (ms) | 34.43 ± 0.20 | 35.60 ± 0.79 | 33.37 ± 1.12 | 35.78 ± 1.18 |
| Mean QTc following dobutamine challenge (ms) | 40.23 ± 0.45 | 39.64 ± 0.52 | 37.01 ± 0.87 | 39.77 ± 0.81 |
Electrocardiographic measurements made in QTc durations before and following dobutamine challenge in young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 8), young Pgc‐1β (n = 9) and aged Pgc‐1β (n = 6) mice. One young and one aged Pgc‐1β mouse were excluded as these showed paradoxical dromotropic effects that led to prolonged PR intervals and P waves that interfered with determinations of the end of the C wave to give the following n values: young WT (n = 5), aged WT (n = 8), young Pgc‐1β (n = 8) and aged Pgc‐1β (n = 5). This gave total n values of WT and Pgc‐1β of 13 in both cases.