| Literature DB >> 28948217 |
Vitaly Shevchenko1,2,3, Thomas Mager4, Kirill Kovalev1,2,3, Vitaly Polovinkin1,3,5, Alexey Alekseev1,2,3, Josephine Juettner6, Igor Chizhov7, Christian Bamann4, Charlotte Vavourakis8, Rohit Ghai9, Ivan Gushchin1,3, Valentin Borshchevskiy3, Andrey Rogachev3,10, Igor Melnikov11, Alexander Popov11, Taras Balandin1, Francisco Rodriguez-Valera12, Dietmar J Manstein7,13, Georg Bueldt3, Ernst Bamberg4, Valentin Gordeliy1,3,5.
Abstract
Generation of an electrochemical proton gradient is the first step of cell bioenergetics. In prokaryotes, the gradient is created by outward membrane protein proton pumps. Inward plasma membrane native proton pumps are yet unknown. We describe comprehensive functional studies of the representatives of the yet noncharacterized xenorhodopsins from Nanohaloarchaea family of microbial rhodopsins. They are inward proton pumps as we demonstrate in model membrane systems, Escherichia coli cells, human embryonic kidney cells, neuroblastoma cells, and rat hippocampal neuronal cells. We also solved the structure of a xenorhodopsin from the nanohalosarchaeon Nanosalina (NsXeR) and suggest a mechanism of inward proton pumping. We demonstrate that the NsXeR is a powerful pump, which is able to elicit action potentials in rat hippocampal neuronal cells up to their maximal intrinsic firing frequency. Hence, inwardly directed proton pumps are suitable for light-induced remote control of neurons, and they are an alternative to the well-known cation-selective channelrhodopsins.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28948217 PMCID: PMC5609834 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1603187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1Electrogenic properties of XeR.
(A) pH changes upon illumination in E. coli cell suspensions expressing different XeRs. Graphs show the pH changes with and without the addition of CCCP. (B) pH changes upon illumination in liposome suspension with reconstructed NsXeR (with and without CCCP). (C) pH changes upon illumination in liposome suspension measured under different pH values.
Fig. 2Spectroscopic characterization of NsXeR.
(A) Absorption spectra of representatives of XeR family solubilized in the detergent DDM (n-dodecyl-β-d-maltoside). The corresponding positions of absorption maximum are indicated in the legend. A.U., arbitrary units. (B) Transient absorption changes of NsXeR (pH 7.5, T = 20°C) at three representative wavelengths: 378, 408, and 564 nm. Black lines represent experimental data, and red and blue lines represent the result of global fit using five exponents. The photocycles were measured for the two preparations: NsXeR in nanodiscs (red) and in liposomes (blue). Note that the differences in amplitudes between the samples are due to the approximately two times higher concentration of NsXeR in liposomes than in nanodiscs (see fig. S3). ΔOD, change in absorbance. (C) Proposed model of NsXeR photocycle in nanodiscs.
Fig. 3High-performance liquid chromatography measurements.
(A) Retinal extraction of light- and dark-adapted solubilized NsXeR reconstituted in liposomes and (B) of light- and dark-adapted solubilized BR (as reference). mOD, milli OD (optical density).
Fig. 4NsXeR structure.
(A) Comparison of NsXeR (yellow) and BR (magenta) motifs. Residues are shown as an NsXeR motif (WDSAPK) and a BR motif (RDTDDK). Two residues, H48 and D220, in NsXeR are shown as an analog of the D96 residue in BR. (B) Putative proton acceptor region in detail. The distance between the Schiff base and water molecule 2 is shown with a double-arrow red line (8.0 Å). Distances between D76 (D85) and the Schiff base in NsXeR (BR) are 4.9 Å (3.8 Å), respectively. Cavities inside the protein calculated by HOLLOW1.2 are shown transparent pink.
Fig. 5Putative NsXeR ion translocation pathway.
Cavities (transparent pink) and putative key residues inside protein are shown. Black arrows show the putative proton path. Helices F and G are not shown. The hydrophobic membrane core boundaries were calculated using the PPM (Positioning of Proteins in Membrane) server and are shown by gray lines.
Fig. 6Photocurrents in HEK293 and NG108-15 cells.
Photocurrents in cells expressing NsXeR at the membrane potentials changed in 20-mV steps from −100 mV and corresponding current-voltage curves. (A) HEK293 cells with pipette solution [110 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM EGTA, and 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4)] and bath solution [140 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4)]. (B) NG108-15 cells with pipette solution [110 mM Na2SO4, 4 mM MgSO4, 10 mM EGTA, and 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4)] and bath solution [140 mM N-methyl-d-glucosamine, 4 mM MgSO4, and 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.4)] (control measurements to confirm that protons are responsible for inwardly directed current).
Fig. 7Spiking traces at different light-pulse frequencies.
Rat hippocampal neurons heterologously expressing NsXeR, C-terminally fused to the Kir2.1 membrane trafficking signal, investigated by current clamp measurements in the whole-cell configuration. Action potentials were triggered by 40 light pulses at indicated frequencies. The light pulses had a pulse width of 3 ms, a wavelength of λ = 532 nm, and an intensity of 23 mW/mm2.