| Literature DB >> 28946878 |
Pankaj Garg1, David A Broadbent1,2, Peter P Swoboda1, James R J Foley1, Graham J Fent1, Tarique A Musa1, David P Ripley1, Bara Erhayiem1, Laura E Dobson1, Adam K McDiarmid1, Philip Haaf1, Ananth Kidambi1, Saul Crandon1, Pei G Chew1, R J van der Geest3, John P Greenwood1, Sven Plein4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Expansion of the myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) is a surrogate measure of focal/diffuse fibrosis and is an independent marker of prognosis in chronic heart disease. Changes in ECV may also occur after myocardial infarction, acutely because of oedema and in convalescence as part of ventricular remodelling. The objective of this study was to investigate changes in the pattern of distribution of regional (normal, infarcted and oedematous segments) and global left ventricular (LV) ECV using semi-automated methods early and late after reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Entities:
Keywords: Acute myocardial infarction; CT and MRI; Cardiovascular imaging agents/techniques; Extracellular matrix
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28946878 PMCID: PMC5613621 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0384-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Fig. 1Study design
Clinical and angiographic characteristics in patients with change of normal segment ECV per-patient between acute and follow-up scan
| Normal segment | Normal segment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean/Median/Count | SD/ 25%–75%/% | Mean/Median/Count | SD/25%–75%/% |
| |
| Patient Demographics | |||||
| Age, yrs | 60 | 11 | 58 | 11 | 0.39 |
| Sex (Male)c | 20 | 40 | 22 | 44 | 0.24 |
| Smokerc | 14 | 28 | 16 | 32 | 0.65 |
| Hypertensionc | 5 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 0.25 |
| Hyperlipidaemiac | 9 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 0.37 |
| Diabetes Mellitusc | 4 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 0.24 |
| Strokec | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.26 |
| Presenting Characteristics | |||||
| Systolic Blood Pressure, mmHg | 137 | 24 | 134 | 36 | 0.88 |
| Heart rate, beats/min | 73 | 14 | 74 | 16 | 0.95 |
| Time from onset of CP to reperfusion, minc | 261 | 158–454 | 222 | 149–344 | 0.43 |
| Heart Failure Killip Classa | |||||
| Ic | 20 | 40 | 26 | 52 | 0.80 |
| IIc | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.70 |
| III-IVc | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.26 |
| Ventricular fibrillation at presentationc | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0.11 |
| Angiographic Characteristics | |||||
| Number of diseased arteriesb | |||||
| Single vessel diseasec | 16 | 30 | 16 | 32 | 0.26 |
| Two vessel diseasec | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 0.67 |
| Three vessel diseasec | 1 | 2 | 7 | 14 |
|
| Culprit Vessel | |||||
| Left main stemc | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.37 |
| Left anterior descendingc | 14 | 28 | 15 | 30 | 0.48 |
| Left circumflexc | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0.80 |
| Right coronaryc | 6 | 12 | 11 | 22 | 0.38 |
| QRS duration, msecc | 90 | 86–110 | 94 | 82–100 | 0.86 |
| TIMI coronary flow | 18 | 36 | 26 | 52 | 0.15 |
| TIMI coronary flow | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0.77 |
| Laboratory results | |||||
| White blood cellsc, ×109/l | 11 | 10–15 | 11 | 10–13 | 0.86 |
| Estimated Glomerular Filtration Ratec, ml/min/1.73m2 | 88 | 77–90 | 90 | 78–90 | 0.47 |
| Creatine kinasec, U/l | 1493 | 786–2400 | 1584 | 867–2570 | 0.75 |
| Troponinc, | 50,000 | 16,441–50,000 | 50,000 | 48,335–50,000 | 0.34 |
| HBA1cc, mmol/mol | 41 | 36–44 | 40 | 36–44 | 0.77 |
| Infarct characteristics | |||||
| Infarct size, volume in % | 30 | 17 | 26 | 12 | 0.42 |
| Area at risk, volume in % | 49 | 19 | 46 | 17 | 0.46 |
| Presence of Microvascular Obstruction (MVO) | 13 | 59 | 16 | 57 | 0.89 |
aKillip classification of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction: class I = no heart failure; class II = pulmonary rales or crepitations, a third heart sound, and elevated jugular venous pressure; class III = acute pulmonary edema; and class IV = cardiogenic shock
bMulti-vessel coronary artery disease was defined according to the number of stenoses of at least 50% of the reference vessel diameter by visual assessment and whether or not there was left main stem involvement
Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; CP = chest pain; ECV = extracellular volume; HBA1c = glycated haemoglobin; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction
cNon-normally distributed
Baseline and follow-up CMR parameters
| Acute CMR | Follow-up CMR |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 25%–75% quartiles | Median | 25%–75% quartiles | ||
| Baseline CMR characteristics | |||||
| LVEDVi, ml/m2 | 79.1 | 71–87 | 80.45 | 70–89 | 0.41 |
| LVESVi, ml/m2 | 42 | 36–50 | 38.7 | 31–47 | 0.02 |
| LV MASSi, grams/m2 | 55.45 | 48–64 | 48.55 | 43–55 | <0.0001 |
| EF, % | 45.65 | 36–51 | 52.35 | 43–59 | <0.0001 |
| IS, volume in % | 23.9 | 17–38 | 13.75 | 9–27 | <0.0001 |
| Segmental myocardial tissue composition and function | |||||
| Median | 25% - 75% Quartiles | Median | 25% - 75% Quartiles | ||
| Normal ECV, % | 27.5 | 24.8–3 0.5 | 27.7 | 25.2–32 | 0.03 |
| Oedema ECV, % | 34 | 29–39.3 | 32 | 28–37 | 0.0002 |
| Infarct ECV, % | 44 | 37.4–49 | 41 | 33.6–46 | <0.0001 |
| Normal WT (mm) | 3.7 | 2.7–4.8 | 3.8 | 2.0–4.7 | 0.81 |
| Oedema WT (mm) | 2.9 | 1.8–4.3 | 3.3 | 2.4–4.3 | 0.02 |
| Infarct WT (mm) | 1.6 | 0.47–2.8 | 2.4 | 1.1–3.6 | <0.0001 |
| Normal EDT (mm) | 7.3 | 6–8 | 6.7 | 6–7.5 | <0.0001 |
| Oedema EDT (mm) | 7.4 | 6–8.5 | 6.5 | 5–7.6 | <0.0001 |
| Infarct EDT (mm) | 7.9 | 7–9 | 6.4 | 56–7.6 | <0.0001 |
| Global myocardial tissue composition | |||||
| Total LV myocyte volume, mL/m2 | 51.2 | 45.7–57.4 | 53.6 | 46.3–61 | 0.14 |
| Total LV extracellular matrix, ml/m2 | 25.8 | 22.7–32.8 | 26.1 | 21.8–32.8 | 0.68 |
LV measurements are indexed to body surface area (BSA), infarct volumes are unindexed. LVEDVi = Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (indexed), LVESVi = Left ventricular end-systolic volume (indexed), LVMi = Left ventricular mass (indexed), RS = peak systolic radial strain (%)
aWilcoxon test (paired samples)
Fig. 2Panel A and B: Scatter plot of 800 segmental ECV values and wall thickening acutely (a) and at follow-up (b). Panel C and D: Cluster bar chart of delta ECV (c) and wall thickening (d)
Fig. 3Cluster bar chart of delta ECV change in 800 segments divided into two categories: segments with functional deterioration and functional improvement. Error bars represent standard deviation
Segmental function and extracellular volume (ECV) results
| Left Ventricular Segmental Function (800 segments) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute WT | Follow-up WT | |||||||
| Spearman rank correlation coefficient |
| Spearman rank correlation coefficient |
| |||||
| Acute ECV | −0.46 | <0.0001 | −0.32 | <0.0001 | ||||
| Follow-up ECV | −0.34 | <0.0001 | −0.35 | <0.0001 | ||||
| Function Deteriorated | Function Improved | |||||||
| Mean | SD | n (%) | Mean | SD | n (%) | |||
| Delta ECVa (%) | Normal | 1.82 | 6.05 | 158 (19.8) | −0.10 | 6.88 | 167 (20.9) |
|
| Oedematous | 0.12 | 8.72 | 107 (13.4) | −3.25 | 9.05 | 139 (17.4) |
| |
| Infarct | −0.34 | 9.35 | 80 (10.0) | −4.36 | 11.42 | 149 (18.6) |
| |
aTests are adjusted for all pairwise comparisons within a row of each innermost sub-table using the Bonferroni correction
Fig. 4Frequency distribution histograms in normal, oedema and infarct segments with/without functional recovery from baseline to follow-up CMR
Fig. 5Box-and-whisker plot of temporal change in ECV of the normal myocardial segments and number of greater than 50 % transmural segments per patient
Fig. 6Scatter-plot of acute segmental ECV (x-axis) to follow-up peak systolic radial strain (y-axis)
Linear regression of baseline patient parameters to number of myocardial segments with improved function at follow-up study
| Number of myocardial segments (per-patient) with improved function | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate | Multivariate | Beta | |
|
|
| ||
| Age | 0.11 | ||
| Sex | 0.99 | ||
| Diabetes Mellitus | 0.57 | ||
| Hypertension | 0.69 | ||
| Smoker | 0.53 | ||
| Time from onset of CP to reperfusion | 0.93 | ||
| Killip Class I | 0.76 | ||
| Killip Class II | 0.85 | ||
| Killip Class III-IV | 0.79 | ||
| Left main stem disease | 0.14 | ||
| 1-vessel disease | 0.48 | ||
| 2-vessel disease | 0.67 | ||
| 3-vessel disease | 0.87 | ||
| TIMI flow pre-intervention | 0.47 | ||
| TIMI flow post intervention | 0.47 | ||
| LVEDV | 0.74 | ||
| LVESV | 0.76 | ||
| LV Mass | 0.39 | ||
| LV ejection fraction | 0.51 | ||
| Stroke volume | 0.43 | ||
| Infarct size | 0.57 | ||
| Area at risk (AAR) | 0.18 | ||
| Acute non-infarcted normal myocardial ECV | 0.89 | ||
| Acute AAR ECV | 0.05 | 0.32 | |
| Acute Infarct ECV | 0.04 | 0.037 | 0.29 |
Association of acute myocardial ECV to adverse LV remodelling
| LV AVR -ve | LV AVR + ve |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients (n) | 40 | 10 | |
| Acute non-oedematous, non-infarcted healthy myocardial ECV (%) | 27.9 ± 3 | 30.4 ± 3.6 | 0.04 |
| Acute infarct ECV (%) | 43 ± 8 | 42 ± 6 | 0.61 |
| Acute oedema ECV (%) | 35.1 ± 6 | 33.3 ± 4 | 0.41 |
Fig. 7Illustration to demonstrate changes in tissue composition post-acute reperfused myocardial infarction. The infarcted myocardial segments demonstrate reduction in overall ECV on follow-up as the damaged myocytes recover function even in the presence of scar. This leads to some function improvement in these infarcted segments. The oedema segments demonstrate significant reduction in ECV as the water content of extracellular matrix falls. Oedema segments also demonstrate significant improvement in function. The normal segments undergo physiological adaptation with involves increase in extracellular volume. This is likely to be the result of overall left ventricular remodelling