Literature DB >> 28946878

Extra-cellular expansion in the normal, non-infarcted myocardium is associated with worsening of regional myocardial function after acute myocardial infarction.

Pankaj Garg1, David A Broadbent1,2, Peter P Swoboda1, James R J Foley1, Graham J Fent1, Tarique A Musa1, David P Ripley1, Bara Erhayiem1, Laura E Dobson1, Adam K McDiarmid1, Philip Haaf1, Ananth Kidambi1, Saul Crandon1, Pei G Chew1, R J van der Geest3, John P Greenwood1, Sven Plein4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Expansion of the myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) is a surrogate measure of focal/diffuse fibrosis and is an independent marker of prognosis in chronic heart disease. Changes in ECV may also occur after myocardial infarction, acutely because of oedema and in convalescence as part of ventricular remodelling. The objective of this study was to investigate changes in the pattern of distribution of regional (normal, infarcted and oedematous segments) and global left ventricular (LV) ECV using semi-automated methods early and late after reperfused ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
METHODS: Fifty patients underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging acutely (24 h-72 h) and at convalescence (3 months). The CMR protocol included: cines, T2-weighted (T2 W) imaging, pre-/post-contrast T1-maps and LGE-imaging. Using T2 W and LGE imaging on acute scans, 16-segments of the LV were categorised as normal, oedema and infarct. 800 segments (16 per-patient) were analysed for changes in ECV and wall thickening (WT).
RESULTS: From the acute studies, 325 (40.6%) segments were classified as normal, 246 (30.8%) segments as oedema and 229 (28.6%) segments as infarct. Segmental change in ECV between acute and follow-up studies (Δ ECV) was significantly different for normal, oedema and infarct segments (0.8 ± 6.5%, -1.78 ± 9%, -2.9 ± 10.9%, respectively; P < 0.001). Normal segments which demonstrated deterioration in wall thickening at follow-up showed significantly increased Δ ECV compared with normal segments with preserved wall thickening at follow up (1.82 ± 6.05% versus -0.10 ± 6.88%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Following reperfused STEMI, normal myocardium demonstrates subtle expansion of the extracellular volume at 3-month follow up. Segmental ECV expansion of normal myocardium is associated with worsening of contractile function.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myocardial infarction; CT and MRI; Cardiovascular imaging agents/techniques; Extracellular matrix

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28946878      PMCID: PMC5613621          DOI: 10.1186/s12968-017-0384-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


Background

Following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), even with immediate mechanical reperfusion therapy, 24–30% patients develop adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling [1, 2]. LV remodelling is a predictor of heart failure, and hence is associated with morbidity and mortality. Post infarct, the acute loss of myocardial function results in an abrupt increase in LV loading conditions that induces a unique pattern of remodelling involving the normal (non-infarcted non-oedematous myocardium), oedematous (injured with oedematous myocardium) and infarcted myocardium [3]. The chronic phase of LV remodelling involves compensatory myocyte hypertrophy and alterations in ventricular geometry to distribute the increased wall stresses more evenly [4]. Early pre-clinical studies have speculated that the ‘normal’ non-infarcted myocardium also undergoes changes due to increased wall stress [5, 6]. There is limited evidence to support these concepts in humans. Additionally, it remains unknown if these changes in tissue composition of normal myocardium have any impact on regional contractility. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) offers comprehensive multi-parametric structural and functional assessment in patients with STEMI [7]. Using early gadolinium enhancement (EGE) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging, accurate assessment of infarct characteristics (infarct size, transmurality of scar, presence of microvascular obstruction and LV thrombus) can be made. T2-weighted (T2 W) imaging allows to diagnose and quantify the extent of myocardial oedema following acute ischaemic injury [8, 9]. Native T1-mapping can also detect acute ischaemia and combined with post contrast T1 mapping allows quantification of the extra-cellular volume (ECV) [10-13]. This study aimed to investigate whether ECV expansion of normal myocardium occurs after STEMI and whether it is associated with a reduction in contractile function between baseline and follow up assessment. We also sought to determine the baseline CMR parameters that are most strongly associated with segmental functional change at follow up.

Methods

Study population

Patients with acute STEMI were prospectively enrolled from a single UK tertiary centre. The study design is detailed in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Study design

Study design The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with first time acute STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) within 12-h of onset of chest pain. Acute STEMI was defined as per current international guidelines [14]. Exclusion criteria included: previous myocardial infaction, coronary artery bypass grafting, known cardiomyopathy, estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, haemodynamic instability (requiring on-going intravenous therapy or respiratory support) and contraindication to CMR imaging. After revascularization, all patients received standard post-myocardial infarction secondary prevention therapy at the discretion of the treating physician, and were enrolled in a cardiac rehabilitation programme if they were deemed suitable [15].

Cardiac catheterization

Coronary angiography and revascularisation were performed in a standard fashion as per current best practice guidelines [15, 16]. TIMI flow grades were assessed visually as described previously following coronary angioplasty [17].

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance

All patients underwent CMR imaging at either 1.5 Tesla (Ingenia CV, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) or 3.0 Tesla (Achieva TX, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). The choice of field strength was arbitrary and was predominantly dictated by availability of the scanners. A dedicated cardiac phased array receiver coil was used (1.5 T: 24-channel equipped with d-stream; 3 T: 32-channel). Acute CMR imaging was scheduled within 72-h of the index presentation and patients were invited to attend for a further CMR study at 3-months follow-up. The same field strength scanners were used for respective patients as for the acute scans.

Image acquisition

Cine, T2 W-imaging, EGE and LGE imaging were performed in contiguous stacks of short-axis slices covering the entire LV for each acquisition. The same slice geometry, position and 10 mm slice thickness were used for all pulse sequences.

T1-maps acquisition

Native and post-contrast T1-maps were planned using the ‘3-of-5’ approach [18]. Post-contrast T1-maps were timed at 15 min after contrast administration and LGE-imaging was performed at 16–20 min.

Image analysis

For each pulse sequence, images with artefact were repeated until any artefact was removed or minimized. The highest quality images were used for analysis. Cine, T2 W-images, EGE-images and LGE-images were evaluated offline using MASS research software (Version 2016EXP, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands). Basic CMR image analysis, T1-maps quality assurance checks, pulse sequence parameters and imaging protocol are described in the online Additional file 1.

Categorising of left ventricular segments

Sixteen segments of the LV excluding the apex, adapted from the 17 segments of the American Heart Association (AHA) model [19], were visually assessed on acute CMR scans and labelled as 1) normal segment (no oedema on T2 W-imaging and no infarct on LGE-imaging), 2) oedema segment (predominantly oedema on T2 W-imaging with no infarct on LGE-imaging 3) infarct segment (presence of any infarction on LGE-imaging with/without oedema on T2 W-imaging).

Myocardial wall thickening analysis

Segmental myocardial systolic wall thickening (WT) analysis was performed for each slice based on endo- and epi-cardial contours. For each segment, end-diastolic and end-systolic wall thickness (EDWT and ESWT, respectively [mm]) were recorded as per previously published literature [20]. This method has demonstrated high intra-inter-observer agreement [21]. Myocardial systolic segmental WT ([mm]) was calculated as absolute change in EDWT and ESWT. For each LV segment, delta change of WT was derived. Functional improvement of segments was defined as positive delta change of WT from baseline to follow-up and vice versa. Additionally, radial strain was computed using endo−/epi- cardial contours through-out the complete cardiac cycle as per previously described methods [22].

Extracellular volume map analysis

ECV maps were generated for the 3 slices (base, mid and apex) from pre−/post-contrast T1-maps and haematocrit as per the standard techniques [10]. The endocardial and epicardial contours were outlined to define myocardium in the 3 slices. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) contours were imported from EGE imaging. Mean ECV values were generated for each segment of the 16 segments excluding the MVO in the infarct zone. Left ventricular global ECV was calculated by multiplication of the averaged per-patient ECV values (for all the 16 segments) and indexed LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). Similarly, left ventricular myocyte cell volume was calculated by using the previously published formula: (1-global ECV)*(indexed LVEDV) [23]. For each patient, mean ECV values for different types of segments (normal, oedema and infarct) were generated on both acute and follow-up studies. For each patient, increase or decrease of ECV of all non-infarcted, healthy myocardium was defined as the change in the mean ECV of all segments and this was investigated for its association with patient characteristics (Table 1).
Table 1

Clinical and angiographic characteristics in patients with change of normal segment ECV per-patient between acute and follow-up scan

Normal segmentECV ↓ (n = 22)Normal segmentECV ↑ (n = 28)
Mean/Median/CountSD/ 25%–75%/%Mean/Median/CountSD/25%–75%/% p-value
Patient Demographics
Age, yrs601158110.39
Sex (Male)c 204022440.24
Smokerc 142816320.65
Hypertensionc 510360.25
Hyperlipidaemiac 9188160.37
Diabetes Mellitusc 48240.24
Strokec 12000.26
Presenting Characteristics
Systolic Blood Pressure, mmHg13724134360.88
Heart rate, beats/min731474160.95
Time from onset of CP to reperfusion, minc 261158–454222149–3440.43
Heart Failure Killip Classa
Ic 204026520.80
IIc 12240.70
III-IVc 12000.26
Ventricular fibrillation at presentationc 00360.11
Angiographic Characteristics
Number of diseased arteriesb
Single vessel diseasec 163016320.26
Two vessel diseasec 5105100.67
Three vessel diseasec 12714 0.05
Culprit Vessel
Left main stemc 00120.37
Left anterior descendingc 142815300.48
Left circumflexc 24240.80
Right coronaryc 61211220.38
QRS duration, msecc 9086–1109482–1000.86
TIMI coronary flowpre-PCI (<2)c 183626520.15
TIMI coronary flowpost-PCI (<3)c 24240.77
Laboratory results
White blood cellsc, ×109/l1110–151110–130.86
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Ratec, ml/min/1.73m2 8877–909078–900.47
Creatine kinasec, U/l1493786–24001584867–25700.75
Troponinc,50,00016,441–50,00050,00048,335–50,0000.34
HBA1cc, mmol/mol4136–444036–440.77
Infarct characteristics
Infarct size, volume in %301726120.42
Area at risk, volume in %491946170.46
Presence of Microvascular Obstruction (MVO)135916570.89

aKillip classification of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction: class I = no heart failure; class II = pulmonary rales or crepitations, a third heart sound, and elevated jugular venous pressure; class III = acute pulmonary edema; and class IV = cardiogenic shock

bMulti-vessel coronary artery disease was defined according to the number of stenoses of at least 50% of the reference vessel diameter by visual assessment and whether or not there was left main stem involvement

Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; CP = chest pain; ECV = extracellular volume; HBA1c = glycated haemoglobin; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction

cNon-normally distributed

Clinical and angiographic characteristics in patients with change of normal segment ECV per-patient between acute and follow-up scan aKillip classification of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction: class I = no heart failure; class II = pulmonary rales or crepitations, a third heart sound, and elevated jugular venous pressure; class III = acute pulmonary edema; and class IV = cardiogenic shock bMulti-vessel coronary artery disease was defined according to the number of stenoses of at least 50% of the reference vessel diameter by visual assessment and whether or not there was left main stem involvement Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; CP = chest pain; ECV = extracellular volume; HBA1c = glycated haemoglobin; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction cNon-normally distributed Adverse LV remodelling was defined as an absolute increase of LV end-systolic volumes >15% at 3 months follow-up [24, 25].

Intra−/inter-observer segmental ECV assessment

For intra−/inter-observer assessments, 48 segments were selected from three randomly chosen scans. To test the inter-observer reliability of segmental ECV values, two blinded observers carried out independent segmentation of ECV-maps (PG and SC) in these segments. To test intra-observer reliability, one observer (PG) undertook a second blinded analysis after three months.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS® Statistics 21.0 (International Business Machines, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Normality of quantitative data was established using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD and non-normally distributed are expressed as median (25th–75th quartile ranges). Demographic comparisons between patients with rise and fall of ECV at follow-up, in the normal myocardial segments, were performed with an independent samples t-test for normally distributed variables and by Mann-Whitney independent t-test for not normally distributed. For paired comparison in Table 2, Wilcoxon test was used. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on demographic and global ECV (rise/fall) at follow-up. Linear regression was used to investigate which baseline study parameter was most strongly associated with number of segments with functional recovery at follow-up. Univariate analysis was performed for each variable separately. Step-wise multivariate linear regression was used for parameters with statistical significance from one-way analysis (p < 0.1). Intra−/inter-observer agreement was assessed by investigating the coefficient of variability (CV), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), precision and accuracy. All statistical tests were 2-tailed; p values <0.05 were considered significant.
Table 2

Baseline and follow-up CMR parameters

Acute CMRFollow-up CMR P-valuea
Median25%–75% quartilesMedian25%–75% quartiles
Baseline CMR characteristics
LVEDVi, ml/m279.171–8780.4570–890.41
LVESVi, ml/m24236–5038.731–470.02
LV MASSi, grams/m255.4548–6448.5543–55<0.0001
EF, %45.6536–5152.3543–59<0.0001
IS, volume in %23.917–3813.759–27<0.0001
Segmental myocardial tissue composition and function
Median25% - 75% QuartilesMedian25% - 75% Quartiles
Normal ECV, %(n = 325)27.524.8–3 0.527.725.2–320.03
Oedema ECV, %(n = 246)3429–39.33228–370.0002
Infarct ECV, %(n = 229)4437.4–494133.6–46<0.0001
Normal WT (mm)(n = 325)3.72.7–4.83.82.0–4.70.81
Oedema WT (mm)(n = 246)2.91.8–4.33.32.4–4.30.02
Infarct WT (mm)(n = 229)1.60.47–2.82.41.1–3.6<0.0001
Normal EDT (mm)7.36–86.76–7.5<0.0001
Oedema EDT (mm)7.46–8.56.55–7.6<0.0001
Infarct EDT (mm)7.97–96.456–7.6<0.0001
Global myocardial tissue composition
Total LV myocyte volume, mL/m251.245.7–57.453.646.3–610.14
Total LV extracellular matrix, ml/m225.822.7–32.826.121.8–32.80.68

LV measurements are indexed to body surface area (BSA), infarct volumes are unindexed. LVEDVi = Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (indexed), LVESVi = Left ventricular end-systolic volume (indexed), LVMi = Left ventricular mass (indexed), RS = peak systolic radial strain (%)

aWilcoxon test (paired samples)

Baseline and follow-up CMR parameters LV measurements are indexed to body surface area (BSA), infarct volumes are unindexed. LVEDVi = Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (indexed), LVESVi = Left ventricular end-systolic volume (indexed), LVMi = Left ventricular mass (indexed), RS = peak systolic radial strain (%) aWilcoxon test (paired samples)

Sample size calculations

We used data of remote zone ECV from published literature using to inform the sample size calculations for this study. In a previous study, delta remote zone ECV in patients with/without adverse LV remodelling were: 0.9 ± 2.2% (with adverse LV remodelling, n = 8) versus 0.9 ± 0.9% (without adverse LV remodelling, n = 32) [26]. Using these data, as per the mean comparison method described by Machin et al., 295 normal segments were needed to investigate functional changes. [27]. Presuming 40% of myocardium is normal post STEMI, the study thus needed to recruit at least 46 patients to give a power of 80% at an alpha of 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

Seventy patients were considered for inclusion, of which 50 had baseline and follow-up CMR (Fig. 1). Acute scans were performed at a median of 48 h after the index presentation. 32 patients had CMR at 1.5 Tesla and 18 patients had CMR at 3 Tesla. All 50 patients were included in the statistical analysis. Clinical and patient demographics are detailed in Table 1.

Per-patient analysis

Patients were categorised into two groups depending on the rise/fall of normal myocardial ECV between baseline and follow-up studies (Table 1). Twenty-eight patients (56%) demonstrated an increase in average normal myocardial ECV at follow-up when compared to acute ECV. No significant differences were seen in baseline demographics between the two groups of patients with a rise or fall of delta-ECV. Patients with triple vessel disease were more prevalent in the group that showed a rise in ECV in normal segments (1 patient versus 7 patients, P = 0.05). There were no differences relating to the field strength of the scanner that was use and the 3 T patients, 10 patients (55.6%) demonstrated ECV expansion in normal myocardial versus 18 (56.2%) on the 1.5 T (P = 0.96 for comparison of 3 T and 1.5 T). LV mass reduced significantly from baseline to follow-up, but global ECV and myocyte cell volume showed no significant change (Table 2).

Per-segment analysis

800 segments were analysed acutely and at follow-up. From the acute studies, 325 (40.6%) segments were classified as normal, 246 (30.8%) segments were classified as oedema and 229 (28.6%) segments were classified as infarct segments. Myocardial oedema was only seen in the peri-infarct zone of the culprit vessel.

Intra−/inter-observer checks for segmental ECV

For the 48 segments which were analysed, intra-observer CV was 6%, with excellent CCC (0.94, 95% CI 0.90–97), high precision (0.95) and accuracy (0.99). For the inter-observer analysis, CV was 7%, with good CCC (0.92, 95% CI 0.87–95) and high precision (0.93) and accuracy (0.99).

Pattern of ECV change

Oedema and infarct segments demonstrated significant reductions in ECV at follow-up (Table 2). Conversely, there was a smaller but statistically significant rise in the ECV of normal myocardium at follow-up (P = 0.03). Segmental change in ECV between acute and follow-up studies was significantly different for normal, oedema and infarct segments (0.8 ± 6.5% versus −1.78 ± 9% or −2.9 ± 10.9%; P < 0.001) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Panel A and B: Scatter plot of 800 segmental ECV values and wall thickening acutely (a) and at follow-up (b). Panel C and D: Cluster bar chart of delta ECV (c) and wall thickening (d)

Panel A and B: Scatter plot of 800 segmental ECV values and wall thickening acutely (a) and at follow-up (b). Panel C and D: Cluster bar chart of delta ECV (c) and wall thickening (d) Temporal changes in normal segmental ECV did not demonstrate any significant association with number of >50% transmural scar segments (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Cluster bar chart of delta ECV change in 800 segments divided into two categories: segments with functional deterioration and functional improvement. Error bars represent standard deviation

Cluster bar chart of delta ECV change in 800 segments divided into two categories: segments with functional deterioration and functional improvement. Error bars represent standard deviation

Segmental ECV and WT

Acute segmental ECV demonstrated significant correlation to both acute segmental WT (P < 0.0001) and to follow-up segmental WT (P < 0.0001) (Table 3). There was a significant increase in ΔECV in normal segments which demonstrated deterioration in wall thickening (Table 3, Fig. 4). For the oedema and infarct segments, ΔECV was significantly different (less or no improvement) in segments with a decrease in wall thickening versus segments that demonstrated improvement in wall thickening (P < 0.05, Table 3, Fig. 5). All segments with functional improvement showed a reduction in follow-up ECV. The percentage of “normal” myocardial segments that demonstrated functional improvement and greater than normal acute baseline ECV (>28%) was not significantly different to “normal” segments with no functional recovery (54% versus 53%, P = 0.33).
Table 3

Segmental function and extracellular volume (ECV) results

Left Ventricular Segmental Function (800 segments)
Acute WTFollow-up WT
Spearman rank correlation coefficient P-valueSpearman rank correlation coefficient P-value
Acute ECV−0.46<0.0001−0.32<0.0001
Follow-up ECV−0.34<0.0001−0.35<0.0001
Function DeterioratedFunction Improved
MeanSDn (%)MeanSDn (%)
Delta ECVa (%)Normal1.826.05158 (19.8)−0.106.88167 (20.9) P < 0.05
Oedematous0.128.72107 (13.4)−3.259.05139 (17.4) P < 0.05
Infarct−0.349.3580 (10.0)−4.3611.42149 (18.6) P < 0.05

aTests are adjusted for all pairwise comparisons within a row of each innermost sub-table using the Bonferroni correction

Fig. 4

Frequency distribution histograms in normal, oedema and infarct segments with/without functional recovery from baseline to follow-up CMR

Fig. 5

Box-and-whisker plot of temporal change in ECV of the normal myocardial segments and number of greater than 50 % transmural segments per patient

Segmental function and extracellular volume (ECV) results aTests are adjusted for all pairwise comparisons within a row of each innermost sub-table using the Bonferroni correction Frequency distribution histograms in normal, oedema and infarct segments with/without functional recovery from baseline to follow-up CMR Box-and-whisker plot of temporal change in ECV of the normal myocardial segments and number of greater than 50 % transmural segments per patient Peak systolic radial strain results are detailed in the online ‘Supplementary material’. Acute ECV of the normal, oedema and infarct segments demonstrated an inverse relation to final follow-up radial strain (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Scatter-plot of acute segmental ECV (x-axis) to follow-up peak systolic radial strain (y-axis)

Scatter-plot of acute segmental ECV (x-axis) to follow-up peak systolic radial strain (y-axis) By univariable analysis of all demographic and CMR parameters, acute oedema and infarct segment ECVs demonstrated association to number of segments (per-patient) that had improvement in function (Table 4). On multivariable linear regression analysis, infarct ECV was most strongly associated with number of segments with functional improvement (beta = 0.4, P = 0.037).
Table 4

Linear regression of baseline patient parameters to number of myocardial segments with improved function at follow-up study

Number of myocardial segments (per-patient) with improved function
UnivariateMultivariateBeta
P-Value P-Value
Age0.11
Sex0.99
Diabetes Mellitus0.57
Hypertension0.69
Smoker0.53
Time from onset of CP to reperfusion0.93
Killip Class I0.76
Killip Class II0.85
Killip Class III-IV0.79
Left main stem disease0.14
1-vessel disease0.48
2-vessel disease0.67
3-vessel disease0.87
TIMI flow pre-intervention0.47
TIMI flow post intervention0.47
LVEDV0.74
LVESV0.76
LV Mass0.39
LV ejection fraction0.51
Stroke volume0.43
Infarct size0.57
Area at risk (AAR)0.18
Acute non-infarcted normal myocardial ECV0.89
Acute AAR ECV0.050.32
Acute Infarct ECV0.040.0370.29
Linear regression of baseline patient parameters to number of myocardial segments with improved function at follow-up study

Adverse LV remodelling

Acute myocardial ECV of normal segments was significantly higher in patients who demonstrated adverse LV remodelling (P = 0.04) (Table 5). Infarct and oedema acute ECV did not demonstrate a difference depending on the presence of adverse LV remodelling at follow-up.
Table 5

Association of acute myocardial ECV to adverse LV remodelling

LV AVR -veLV AVR + ve P-value
Number of patients (n)4010
Acute non-oedematous, non-infarcted healthy myocardial ECV (%)27.9 ± 330.4 ± 3.60.04
Acute infarct ECV (%)43 ± 842 ± 60.61
Acute oedema ECV (%)35.1 ± 633.3 ± 40.41
Association of acute myocardial ECV to adverse LV remodelling

Discussion

The present study demonstrates that 1) in reperfused STEMI, normal myocardial segments show a subtle expansion of the ECV between baseline and 3 month follow-up; 2) conversely, oedematous and infarcted segments show a significant reduction in ECV at follow up; 3) normal segments that demonstrate deterioration in segmental function at follow-up show a substantial increase in delta-ECV from baseline to follow up; 4) acute infarct ECV demonstrates the best association with the number of segments with functional recovery (Fig. 3) and 5) high acute normal myocardial segmental ECV is associated with adverse LV remodelling at follow-up. Previous studies have already shown that ECV is raised in ‘remote’ myocardium in acute STEMI [26, 28]. Remote myocardium is defined as the AHA segment 180-degrees from the infarct territory with normal motion and no LGE [26, 28]. In the present study, we chose to assess all segments that did not have evidence of oedema or infarction and in order to avoid misinterpretation with the standard definition of ‘remote’ myocardium, defined these as ‘normal’ segments. Carberry et al. demonstrated that acute remote zone ECV post STEMI is associated with certain baseline patient characteristics (male gender, body mass index and history of diabetes) [28]. They also showed that the remote zone ECV was associated with the level of baseline N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). In our study the number of patients with angiographic triple vessel disease was marginally higher in patients with increased normal myocardial ECV when compared to patients with 0−/1−/2-vessel disease (Table 1, P = 0.05). We speculate that in triple vessel disease, coronary steal may reduce flow in non-culprit vessels due to better flow down the revascularised culprit vessel, which may cause adverse tissue level remodelling [29-31]. Other possible mechanisms which influence non-infarcted myocardium include increased loading conditions secondary to infarct characteristics. For example, Litwin et al.’s pre-clinical work demonstrated that the extra-cellular matrix of the non-infarcted normal myocardium undergoes expansion mainly due to increased wall stresses [6]. Associations of segmental ECV and segmental and global function have been studied previously [26, 32, 33]. Collins et al. demonstrated that the segmental extent of fibrosis is associated with segmental function in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy [33]. Additionally, they demonstrated that this linear association was still relevant in patients with preserved global function and in patients with no late gadolinium enhancement. Our study has now shown that mean ECV is also associated with segmental function in patients with acute STEMI. Bulluck et al. demonstrated that mean segmental ECV in the remote myocardium is raised acutely post STEMI (18). Their mean segmental remote myocardial ECV values are comparable to the present study’s ‘normal’ myocardial segment ECV (27.9 ± 2.1%). Remote (defined as normal myocardium in this study) myocardial dysfunction after STEMI is considered the main reason why some patients demonstrate function loss that is disproportionate to infarct size [30, 34]. Bogaert et al. demonstrated that remote myocardial dysfunction contributes significantly to the loss in global ventricular function. The present study confirms that normal myocardium with no obvious oedema or infarction can also be affected by functional loss measured by either LV wall thickening or radial strain. Additionally, this study further shows that normal myocardial segments after acute MI which demonstrate dysfunction also have significant extracellular matrix expansion. This could be explained by increased reactive fibrosis during the proliferative and maturation phase of remodelling, in the extracellular matrix of the normal myocardial segments, mainly due to higher wall shear stresses [35]. A recent study from our group demonstrated that acute ‘infarct zone’ ECV is predictive of regional and global LV functional recovery, and adds prognostic value over LGE [36]. Particularly for infarcts with higher transmural extent, acute infarct ECV was an additional predictor of functional recovery that can complement transmural infarct extent by LGE. In addition to these previously reported findings, we have now shown that acute infarct mean segmental ECV correlates with segmental functional recovery at follow-up and that a reduction in ECV in infarct segments is associated with improvement in regional function at follow-up. This is the first in-vivo study that reports longitudinal changes in segmental ECV in non-infarcted normal, oedema and infarcted LV segments. Our data suggest that non-oedematous, non-infarcted normal LV myocardium undergoes remodelling with a subtle expansion of the extracellular matrix (Fig. 7). In particular, normal myocardial segments which demonstrate myocardial functional loss at follow-up have an increase in ECV.
Fig. 7

Illustration to demonstrate changes in tissue composition post-acute reperfused myocardial infarction. The infarcted myocardial segments demonstrate reduction in overall ECV on follow-up as the damaged myocytes recover function even in the presence of scar. This leads to some function improvement in these infarcted segments. The oedema segments demonstrate significant reduction in ECV as the water content of extracellular matrix falls. Oedema segments also demonstrate significant improvement in function. The normal segments undergo physiological adaptation with involves increase in extracellular volume. This is likely to be the result of overall left ventricular remodelling

Illustration to demonstrate changes in tissue composition post-acute reperfused myocardial infarction. The infarcted myocardial segments demonstrate reduction in overall ECV on follow-up as the damaged myocytes recover function even in the presence of scar. This leads to some function improvement in these infarcted segments. The oedema segments demonstrate significant reduction in ECV as the water content of extracellular matrix falls. Oedema segments also demonstrate significant improvement in function. The normal segments undergo physiological adaptation with involves increase in extracellular volume. This is likely to be the result of overall left ventricular remodelling

Limitations

Of 70 patients that underwent initial screening for recruitment only 50 patients underwent the entire protocol possibly introducing an element of selection bias. However, in a clinical study of acutely ill patients, exclusion or drop out of patients is common and our exclusion rate is within that reported in similar previous reports [9, 37]. There were other caveats to the present study: firstly, segments specifically classified as infarct also conceivably had oedema, which may have altered the results for respective segments. An important limitation of T1-mapping for clinical application is possible partial volume contamination from blood. Nevertheless, MOLLI sequences used in the present study, have been shown to be precise and reproducible [38]. The results of this study may be influenced by the tethering and local interaction of “adjacent” (to peri-infarct zone) normal myocardium. Changes in the adjacent normal myocardium may demonstrate a different pattern of temporal changes when compared to remote myocardium.

Conclusion

This study suggests that following reperfused STEMI, the ‘normal’ LV myocardium undergoes remodelling with a subtle expansion of the extracellular matrix. In particular, normal segments which have functional loss demonstrate significant expansion of the extracellular space. Additionally, acute myocardial ECV of normal segments was significantly higher in patients who experienced adverse LV remodelling. Myocardial segments with oedema and infarction demonstrate significant reduction in ECV.
  32 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Noninvasive cardiac imaging in suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; S Richard Underwood; Roxy Senior; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White; Allan S Jaffe; Hugo A Katus; Fred S Apple; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Bernard R Chaitman; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Jeroen J Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasche; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; Jose-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis; Jeroen J Bax; Helmut Baumgartner; Claudio Ceconi; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; David Hasdai; Arno Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Theresa McDonagh; Cyril Moulin; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Udo Sechtem; Per Anton Sirnes; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; Alec Vahanian; Stephan Windecker; Joao Morais; Carlos Aguiar; Wael Almahmeed; David O Arnar; Fabio Barili; Kenneth D Bloch; Ann F Bolger; Hans Erik Botker; Biykem Bozkurt; Raffaele Bugiardini; Christopher Cannon; James de Lemos; Franz R Eberli; Edgardo Escobar; Mark Hlatky; Stefan James; Karl B Kern; David J Moliterno; Christian Mueller; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Burkert Mathias Pieske; Steven P Schulman; Robert F Storey; Kathryn A Taubert; Pascal Vranckx; Daniel R Wagner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  2016 ACC/AHA Guideline Focused Update on Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Glenn N Levine; Eric R Bates; John A Bittl; Ralph G Brindis; Stephan D Fihn; Lee A Fleisher; Christopher B Granger; Richard A Lange; Michael J Mack; Laura Mauri; Roxana Mehran; Debabrata Mukherjee; L Kristin Newby; Patrick T O'Gara; Marc S Sabatine; Peter K Smith; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Extracellular volume fraction is more closely associated with altered regional left ventricular velocities than left ventricular ejection fraction in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Jeremy Collins; Cort Sommerville; Patrick Magrath; Bruce Spottiswoode; Benjamin H Freed; Keith H Benzuly; Robert Gordon; Himabindu Vidula; Dan C Lee; Clyde Yancy; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Relationship of multidirectional myocardial strain with radial thickening and ejection fraction and impact of left ventricular hypertrophy: a study in a community-based cohort.

Authors:  Cesare Russo; Zhezhen Jin; Shunichi Homma; Tatjana Rundek; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 1.724

8.  The role of left ventricular deformation in the assessment of microvascular obstruction and intramyocardial haemorrhage.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Ananth Kidambi; Peter P Swoboda; James R J Foley; Tarique A Musa; David P Ripley; Bara Erhayiem; Laura E Dobson; Adam K McDiarmid; Graham J Fent; Philip Haaf; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Prediction of Left Ventricular Remodeling after a Myocardial Infarction: Role of Myocardial Deformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Olivier Huttin; Stefano Coiro; Christine Selton-Suty; Yves Juillière; Erwan Donal; Julien Magne; Nicolas Sadoul; Faiez Zannad; Patrick Rossignol; Nicolas Girerd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Extracellular volume fraction mapping in the myocardium, part 2: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Joel R Wilson; Hui Xue; W Patricia Bandettini; Sujata M Shanbhag; Kirk M Druey; Martin Ugander; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of heart disease in women: review and case presentation.

Authors:  Nidaa Mikail; Alexia Rossi; Susan Bengs; Ahmed Haider; Barbara E Stähli; Angela Portmann; Alessio Imperiale; Valerie Treyer; Alexander Meisel; Aju P Pazhenkottil; Michael Messerli; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Philipp A Kaufmann; Ronny R Buechel; Cathérine Gebhard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Cardiac fibrosis.

Authors:  Nikolaos G Frangogiannis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 3.  Definition of left ventricular remodelling following ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review of cardiac magnetic resonance studies in the past decade.

Authors:  Damien Legallois; Amir Hodzic; Joachim Alexandre; Charles Dolladille; Eric Saloux; Alain Manrique; Vincent Roule; Fabien Labombarda; Paul Milliez; Farzin Beygui
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Standard and emerging CMR methods for mitral regurgitation quantification.

Authors:  Benjamin Fidock; Gareth Archer; Natasha Barker; Alaa Elhawaz; Abdallah Al-Mohammad; Alexander Rothman; Rod Hose; Ian R Hall; Ever Grech; Norman Briffa; Nigel Lewis; Rob J van der Geest; Jun-Mei Zhang; Liang Zhong; Andrew J Swift; James M Wild; Estefania De Gárate; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Jeroen J Bax; Sven Plein; Saul Myerson; Pankaj Garg
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.039

Review 5.  Cardiac MRI Endpoints in Myocardial Infarction Experimental and Clinical Trials: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.

Authors:  Borja Ibanez; Anthony H Aletras; Andrew E Arai; Hakan Arheden; Jeroen Bax; Colin Berry; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Pierre Croisille; Erica Dall'Armellina; Rohan Dharmakumar; Ingo Eitel; Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez; Matthias G Friedrich; David García-Dorado; Derek J Hausenloy; Raymond J Kim; Sebastian Kozerke; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno; Javier Sánchez-González; Javier Sanz; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Evolution of left ventricular function among subjects with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ulrika Pahlm; Ellen Ostenfeld; Felicia Seemann; Henrik Engblom; David Erlinge; Einar Heiberg; Håkan Arheden; Marcus Carlsson
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 7.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Recent Advances, Controversies, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Heerajnarain Bulluck; Rohan Dharmakumar; Andrew E Arai; Colin Berry; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Role of cardiac T1 mapping and extracellular volume in the assessment of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Laura C Saunders; Andrew J Swift; Jim M Wild; Sven Plein
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 9.  Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017.

Authors:  Warren J Manning
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Increased Serum CA125 and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Levels on Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Predictor for Acute Heart Failure.

Authors:  Haibo Wu; Guangyun Cao; Yuncan Wang; Huanping Tian; Rongpin Du
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.