| Literature DB >> 32458217 |
Damien Legallois1, Amir Hodzic2, Joachim Alexandre3, Charles Dolladille4,3, Eric Saloux4, Alain Manrique5,6, Vincent Roule4, Fabien Labombarda7, Paul Milliez4, Farzin Beygui4.
Abstract
An increase in left ventricular volumes between baseline and follow-up imaging is the main criteria for the quantification of left ventricular remodelling (LVR) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but without consensual definition. We aimed to review the criteria used for the definition of LVR based on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in STEMI patients. A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from January 2010 to August 2019. Thirty-seven studies involving 4209 patients were included. Among these studies, 30 (81%) used a cut-off value for defining LVR, with a pooled LVR prevalence estimate of 22.8%, 95% CI [19.4-26.7%] and a major between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 82%). The seven remaining studies (19%) defined LVR as a continuous variable. The definition of LVR using CMR following STEMI is highly variable, among studies including highly selected patients. A 20% increase or a 15% increase in left ventricular volumes between a baseline and a follow-up CMR imaging were the two most common criterion (13 [35%] and 9 [24%] studies, respectively). The most frequent LVR criterion was a 20% increase in end-diastolic volumes or a 15% increase in end-systolic volumes. A composite cut-off value of a 12 to 15% increase in end-systolic volume and a 12 to 20% increase in end-diastolic volume using a follow-up CMR imaging 3 months after STEMI might be proposed as a consensual cut-off for defining adverse LVR for future large-sized, prospective studies with serial CMR imaging and long-term follow-up in unselected patients.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance; Left ventricular remodelling; ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 32458217 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-020-09975-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Fail Rev ISSN: 1382-4147 Impact factor: 4.214