BACKGROUND:Left ventricular (LV) systolic strain provides additional prognostic value to LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion analysis. However, the relationship between myocardial multidirectional strain and LVEF, and the effect of LV hypertrophy on this relationship, are not completely understood especially in unselected populations. METHODS:LV global longitudinal (εL ) and circumferential (εC ) systolic strain analysis was performed by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in 215 participants from a community-based study. LV radial wall thickening was measured as global radial strain (εR ), and LVEF was assessed by biplane Simpson's method. RESULTS: εR was significantly associated with εC (β = -0.56, P < 0.01) and with εL (β = -0.18, P < 0.01). The contribution of εL to εR was especially evident in subjects with lower εC and in presence of LV hypertrophy (β = -0.30, P < 0.01). εL and εC were significantly associated with LVEF (β = -0.36 and β = -0.49, both P < 0.01) independent of LV mass and other confounders, and their interaction significantly improved the prediction of LVEF (R(2) -change = 0.14) but not of εR (R(2) -change = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: εR is mainly related to εC with a smaller contribution of εL , which becomes especially evident in subjects with lower εC and in presence of LV hypertrophy. Therefore, radial thickening may not detect subclinical LV longitudinal function reduction in normal ventricles and when εC is preserved. While a reduction in εL has a limited impact on εR , it exerts a greater effect on global LVEF, therefore for a more accurate LVEF prediction both εL and εC need to be considered.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) systolic strain provides additional prognostic value to LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and wall motion analysis. However, the relationship between myocardial multidirectional strain and LVEF, and the effect of LV hypertrophy on this relationship, are not completely understood especially in unselected populations. METHODS: LV global longitudinal (εL ) and circumferential (εC ) systolic strain analysis was performed by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in 215 participants from a community-based study. LV radial wall thickening was measured as global radial strain (εR ), and LVEF was assessed by biplane Simpson's method. RESULTS: εR was significantly associated with εC (β = -0.56, P < 0.01) and with εL (β = -0.18, P < 0.01). The contribution of εL to εR was especially evident in subjects with lower εC and in presence of LV hypertrophy (β = -0.30, P < 0.01). εL and εC were significantly associated with LVEF (β = -0.36 and β = -0.49, both P < 0.01) independent of LV mass and other confounders, and their interaction significantly improved the prediction of LVEF (R(2) -change = 0.14) but not of εR (R(2) -change = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: εR is mainly related to εC with a smaller contribution of εL , which becomes especially evident in subjects with lower εC and in presence of LV hypertrophy. Therefore, radial thickening may not detect subclinical LV longitudinal function reduction in normal ventricles and when εC is preserved. While a reduction in εL has a limited impact on εR , it exerts a greater effect on global LVEF, therefore for a more accurate LVEF prediction both εL and εC need to be considered.
Authors: Mustafa I Ahmed; Ravi V Desai; Krishna K Gaddam; Bharath A Venkatesh; Shilpi Agarwal; Seidu Inusah; Steven G Lloyd; Thomas S Denney; David Calhoun; Louis J Dell'italia; Himanshu Gupta Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-03
Authors: Réal Lebeau; Maria Di Lorenzo; Robert Amyot; Martin Veilleux; Raymond Lemieux; Claude Sauvé Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2003-03-31 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Cesare Russo; Zhezhen Jin; Shunichi Homma; Tatjana Rundek; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio Journal: Heart Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Cesare Russo; Zhezhen Jin; Shunichi Homma; Mitchell S V Elkind; Tatjana Rundek; Mitsuhiro Yoshita; Charles DeCarli; Clinton B Wright; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-07-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Cesare Russo; Zhezhen Jin; Fusako Sera; Edward S Lee; Shunichi Homma; Tatjana Rundek; Mitchell S V Elkind; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Cesare Russo; Zhezhen Jin; Mitchell S V Elkind; Tatjana Rundek; Shunichi Homma; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Fusako Sera; Zhezhen Jin; Cesare Russo; Edward S Lee; Joseph E Schwartz; Tatjana Rundek; Mitchell S V Elkind; Shunichi Homma; Ralph L Sacco; Marco R Di Tullio Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Pankaj Garg; David A Broadbent; Peter P Swoboda; James R J Foley; Graham J Fent; Tarique A Musa; David P Ripley; Bara Erhayiem; Laura E Dobson; Adam K McDiarmid; Philip Haaf; Ananth Kidambi; Saul Crandon; Pei G Chew; R J van der Geest; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 5.364