Literature DB >> 28944609

Hypertension management research priorities from patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers: A report from the Hypertension Canada Priority Setting Partnership Group.

Nadia Khan1,2, Simon L Bacon3,4, Samia Khan5,6, Sara Perlmutter7, Carline Gerlinsky8, Mark Dermer9, Lonni Johnson10, Finderson Alves11, Donna McLean12, Andreas Laupacis13,14,15, Mandy Pui16, Angelique Berg16, Felicia Flowitt16.   

Abstract

Patient- and stakeholder-oriented research is vital to improving the relevance of research. The authors aimed to identify the 10 most important research priorities of patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers (family physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and dietitians) for hypertension management. Using the James Lind Alliance approach, a national web-based survey asked patients, caregivers, and care providers to submit their unanswered questions on hypertension management. Questions already answered from randomized controlled trial evidence were removed. A priority setting process of patient, caregiver, and healthcare providers then ranked the final top 10 research priorities in an in-person meeting. There were 386 respondents who submitted 598 questions after exclusions. Of the respondents, 78% were patients or caregivers, 29% lived in rural areas, 78% were aged 50 to 80 years, and 75% were women. The 598 questions were distilled to 42 unique questions and from this list, the top 10 research questions prioritized included determining the combinations of healthy lifestyle modifications to reduce the need for antihypertensive medications, stress management interventions, evaluating treatment strategies based on out-of-office blood pressure compared with conventional (office) blood pressure, education tools and technologies to improve patient motivation and health behavior change, management strategies for ethnic groups, evaluating natural and alternative treatments, and the optimal role of different healthcare providers and caregivers in supporting patients with hypertension. These priorities can be used to guide clinicians, researchers, and funding bodies on areas that are a high priority for hypertension management research for patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. This also highlights priority areas for improved knowledge translation and delivering patient-centered care. ©2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical management; high blood pressure ; patient education; primary care issues

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28944609      PMCID: PMC8031279          DOI: 10.1111/jch.13091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  15 in total

1.  Top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Harriet Allison; Katherine Cowan
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 44.182

2.  The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Lori Frank; Ethan Basch; Joe V Selby
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Determining research priorities through partnership with patients: an overview.

Authors:  Lianne Barnieh; Min Jun; Andreas Laupacis; Braden Manns; Brenda Hemmelgarn
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  ACCF/AHA 2011 expert consensus document on hypertension in the elderly: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus documents developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology, American Geriatrics Society, American Society for Preventive Cardiology, American Society of Hypertension, American Society of Nephrology, Association of Black Cardiologists, and European Society of Hypertension.

Authors:  Wilbert S Aronow; Jerome L Fleg; Carl J Pepine; Nancy T Artinian; George Bakris; Alan S Brown; Keith C Ferdinand; Mary Ann Forciea; William H Frishman; Cheryl Jaigobin; John B Kostis; Giuseppi Mancia; Suzanne Oparil; Eduardo Ortiz; Efrain Reisin; Michael W Rich; Douglas D Schocken; Michael A Weber; Deborah J Wesley
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Robert Fagard; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Josep Redón; Alberto Zanchetti; Michael Böhm; Thierry Christiaens; Renata Cifkova; Guy De Backer; Anna Dominiczak; Maurizio Galderisi; Diederick E Grobbee; Tiny Jaarsma; Paulus Kirchhof; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Stéphane Laurent; Athanasios J Manolis; Peter M Nilsson; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Per Anton Sirnes; Peter Sleight; Margus Viigimaa; Bernard Waeber; Faiez Zannad
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Hypertension Canada's 2016 Canadian Hypertension Education Program Guidelines for Blood Pressure Measurement, Diagnosis, Assessment of Risk, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension.

Authors:  Alexander A Leung; Kara Nerenberg; Stella S Daskalopoulou; Kerry McBrien; Kelly B Zarnke; Kaberi Dasgupta; Lyne Cloutier; Mark Gelfer; Maxime Lamarre-Cliche; Alain Milot; Peter Bolli; Guy Tremblay; Donna McLean; Sheldon W Tobe; Marcel Ruzicka; Kevin D Burns; Michel Vallée; G V Ramesh Prasad; Marcel Lebel; Ross D Feldman; Peter Selby; Andrew Pipe; Ernesto L Schiffrin; Philip A McFarlane; Paul Oh; Robert A Hegele; Milan Khara; Thomas W Wilson; S Brian Penner; Ellen Burgess; Robert J Herman; Simon L Bacon; Simon W Rabkin; Richard E Gilbert; Tavis S Campbell; Steven Grover; George Honos; Patrice Lindsay; Michael D Hill; Shelagh B Coutts; Gord Gubitz; Norman R C Campbell; Gordon W Moe; Jonathan G Howlett; Jean-Martin Boulanger; Ally Prebtani; Pierre Larochelle; Lawrence A Leiter; Charlotte Jones; Richard I Ogilvie; Vincent Woo; Janusz Kaczorowski; Luc Trudeau; Robert J Petrella; Swapnil Hiremath; Denis Drouin; Kim L Lavoie; Pavel Hamet; George Fodor; Jean C Grégoire; Richard Lewanczuk; George K Dresser; Mukul Sharma; Debra Reid; Scott A Lear; Gregory Moullec; Milan Gupta; Laura A Magee; Alexander G Logan; Kevin C Harris; Janis Dionne; Anne Fournier; Geneviève Benoit; Janusz Feber; Luc Poirier; Raj S Padwal; Doreen M Rabi
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 5.223

7.  Hypertension management research priorities from patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers: A report from the Hypertension Canada Priority Setting Partnership Group.

Authors:  Nadia Khan; Simon L Bacon; Samia Khan; Sara Perlmutter; Carline Gerlinsky; Mark Dermer; Lonni Johnson; Finderson Alves; Donna McLean; Andreas Laupacis; Mandy Pui; Angelique Berg; Felicia Flowitt
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Patient and general practitioner attitudes to taking medication to prevent cardiovascular disease after receiving detailed information on risks and benefits of treatment: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nicola K Gale; Sheila Greenfield; Paramjit Gill; Kerry Gutridge; Tom Marshall
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 9.  Patient engagement in research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan Pablo Domecq; Gabriela Prutsky; Tarig Elraiyah; Zhen Wang; Mohammed Nabhan; Nathan Shippee; Juan Pablo Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia Erwin; David Eton; Jeff Sloan; Victor Montori; Noor Asi; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Antoine Boivin; Pascale Lehoux; Réal Lacombe; Jako Burgers; Richard Grol
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hypertension management research priorities from patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers: A report from the Hypertension Canada Priority Setting Partnership Group.

Authors:  Nadia Khan; Simon L Bacon; Samia Khan; Sara Perlmutter; Carline Gerlinsky; Mark Dermer; Lonni Johnson; Finderson Alves; Donna McLean; Andreas Laupacis; Mandy Pui; Angelique Berg; Felicia Flowitt
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.

Authors:  Alison Ho; Louise Webster; Liza Bowen; Fiona Creighton; Sarah Findlay; Chris Gale; Marcus Green; Toto Gronlund; Laura A Magee; Richard J McManus; Hiten D Mistry; Gemma Singleton; Jim Thornton; Rebecca Whybrow; Lucy Chappell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Study Protocol: Determining Research Priorities of Young Albertan Families (The Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting Project-FRAISE)-Participatory Action Research.

Authors:  Katherine S Bright; Carla Ginn; Elizabeth M Keys; Meredith L Brockway; Lianne Tomfohr-Madsen; Stephanie Doane; Karen Benzies
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-08-28

4.  Comparative effectiveness of physical activity interventions and anti-hypertensive pharmacological interventions in reducing blood pressure in people with hypertension: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  C Noone; C P Dwyer; J Murphy; J Newell; G J Molloy
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-21

5.  The James Lind Alliance process approach: scoping review.

Authors:  Agnete Nygaard; Liv Halvorsrud; Siv Linnerud; Ellen Karine Grov; Astrid Bergland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Patients, clinicians and researchers working together to improve cardiovascular health: a qualitative study of barriers and priorities for patient-oriented research.

Authors:  Maria-Jose Santana; Sandra Zelinsky; Sadia Ahmed; Chelsea Doktorchik; Matthew James; Stephen Wilton; Hude Quan; Nicolas Fernandez; Todd Anderson; Sonia Butalia
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Filling gaps in type 1 diabetes and exercise research: a scoping review and priority-setting project.

Authors:  Nika M D Klaprat; Nicole Askin; Andrea MacIntosh; Nicole Brunton; Jacqueline L Hay; Jane E Yardley; Seth D Marks; Kathryn M Sibley; Todd A Duhamel; Jonathan M McGavock
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2020-03

Review 8.  Priorities of patients, caregivers and health-care professionals for health research - A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Levelink; Mona Voigt-Barbarowicz; Anna Levke Brütt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.377

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.