Kelly K Ferguson1, Helen B Chin1. 1. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Preterm birth is a significant worldwide health problem of uncertain origins. The extant body of literature examining environmental contaminant exposures in relation to preterm birth is extensive but results remain ambiguous for most organic pollutants, metals and metalloids, and air pollutants. In the present review we examine recent epidemiologic studies investigating these associations, and identify recent advances and the state of the science. Additionally, we highlight biological mechanisms of action in the pathway between chemical exposures and preterm birth, including inflammation, oxidative stress, and endocrine disruption, that deserve more attention in this context. RECENT FINDINGS: Important advances have been made in the study of the environment and preterm birth, particularly in regard to exposure assessment methods, exploration of effect modification by co-morbidities and exposures, and in identification of windows of vulnerability during gestation. There is strong evidence for an association between maternal exposure to some persistent pesticides, lead, and fine particulate matter, but data on other contaminants is sparse and only suggestive trends can be noted with the current data. SUMMARY: Beyond replicating current findings, further work must be done to improve understanding of mechanisms underlying the associations observed between environmental chemical exposures and preterm birth. By examining windows of vulnerability, disaggregating preterm birth by phenotypes, and measuring biomarkers of mechanistic pathways in these epidemiologic studies we can improve our ability to detect associations with exposure, provide additional evidence for causality in an observational setting, and identify opportunities for intervention.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Preterm birth is a significant worldwide health problem of uncertain origins. The extant body of literature examining environmental contaminant exposures in relation to preterm birth is extensive but results remain ambiguous for most organic pollutants, metals and metalloids, and air pollutants. In the present review we examine recent epidemiologic studies investigating these associations, and identify recent advances and the state of the science. Additionally, we highlight biological mechanisms of action in the pathway between chemical exposures and preterm birth, including inflammation, oxidative stress, and endocrine disruption, that deserve more attention in this context. RECENT FINDINGS: Important advances have been made in the study of the environment and preterm birth, particularly in regard to exposure assessment methods, exploration of effect modification by co-morbidities and exposures, and in identification of windows of vulnerability during gestation. There is strong evidence for an association between maternal exposure to some persistent pesticides, lead, and fine particulate matter, but data on other contaminants is sparse and only suggestive trends can be noted with the current data. SUMMARY: Beyond replicating current findings, further work must be done to improve understanding of mechanisms underlying the associations observed between environmental chemical exposures and preterm birth. By examining windows of vulnerability, disaggregating preterm birth by phenotypes, and measuring biomarkers of mechanistic pathways in these epidemiologic studies we can improve our ability to detect associations with exposure, provide additional evidence for causality in an observational setting, and identify opportunities for intervention.
Authors: David A Savitz; Cheryl R Stein; Scott M Bartell; Beth Elston; Jian Gong; Hyeong-Moo Shin; Gregory A Wellenius Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Felipe Vadillo-Ortega; Alvaro Osornio-Vargas; Miatta A Buxton; Brisa N Sánchez; Leonora Rojas-Bracho; Martin Viveros-Alcaráz; Marisol Castillo-Castrejón; Jorge Beltrán-Montoya; Daniel G Brown; Marie S O'Neill Journal: Med Hypotheses Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 1.538
Authors: Michele P Hamm; Nicola M Cherry; Emily Chan; Jonathan W Martin; Igor Burstyn Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Olivier Laurent; Jianlin Hu; Lianfa Li; Michael J Kleeman; Scott M Bartell; Myles Cockburn; Loraine Escobedo; Jun Wu Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: John D Meeker; Howard Hu; David E Cantonwine; Hector Lamadrid-Figueroa; Antonia M Calafat; Adrienne S Ettinger; Mauricio Hernandez-Avila; Rita Loch-Caruso; Martha María Téllez-Rojo Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Janice M Y Hu; Tye E Arbuckle; Patricia Janssen; Bruce P Lanphear; Joseph M Braun; Robert W Platt; Aimin Chen; William D Fraser; Lawrence C McCandless Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2020-05-21
Authors: Vicente Mustieles; Yu Zhang; Jennifer Yland; Joseph M Braun; Paige L Williams; Blair J Wylie; Jill A Attaman; Jennifer B Ford; Alexandra Azevedo; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Carmen Messerlian Journal: Environ Int Date: 2020-02-29 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Peck Yin Chin; Camilla Dorian; David J Sharkey; Mark R Hutchinson; Kenner C Rice; Lachlan M Moldenhauer; Sarah A Robertson Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Stephani S Kim; John D Meeker; Rachel Carroll; Shanshan Zhao; Michael J Mourgas; Michael J Richards; Max Aung; David E Cantonwine; Thomas F McElrath; Kelly K Ferguson Journal: Environ Int Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 9.621