Literature DB >> 28940054

Framework for assessment and phytoremediation of asbestos-contaminated sites.

Cédric Gonneau1, Kinsey Miller2, Sanjay K Mohanty3,4, Rengyi Xu5, Wei-Ting Hwang5, Jane K Willenbring3,6, Brenda B Casper2.   

Abstract

We examine the feasibility of phytoremediation as an alternative strategy to limit the exposure of asbestos in site with asbestos-containing materials. We collected soils from four locations from two sites-one with naturally occurring asbestos, and another, a superfund site, where asbestos-containing materials were disposed over decades-and performed ecotoxicology tests. We also performed two experiments with crop cultivar and two grasses from serpentine ecotype and cultivar to determined best choice for phytoremediation. Asbestos concentrations in different size fractions of soils varied by orders of magnitude. However, different asbestos concentrations had little effect on germination and root growth. Presence of co-contaminants such as heavy metals and lack of nutrients affected plant growth to different extents, indicating that several of these limiting factors should be considered instead of the primary contaminant of concern. Crop cultivar survived on asbestos-contaminated soil. Grasses from serpentine ecotype did not show higher biomass than the cultivar. Overall, these results showed that soil conditions play a critical role in screening different crop species for phytoremediation and that asbestos concentration has limited to no effect on plant growth. Our study provided a framework for phytoremediation of asbestos-contaminated sites to limit long-term asbestos exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASTM method; Asbestos; Crop cultivar; Heavy metal; Native grass; Phytostabilization; Size fraction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28940054      PMCID: PMC5769457          DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0177-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  23 in total

1.  Soil fungi reduce the iron content and the DNA damaging effects of asbestos fibers.

Authors:  Stefania Daghino; Francesco Turci; Maura Tomatis; Alain Favier; Silvia Perotto; Thierry Douki; Bice Fubini
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Unique aspects of the grass cell wall.

Authors:  John Vogel
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 7.834

3.  Differential elemental uptake in three pseudo-metallophyte C4 grasses in situ in the eastern USA.

Authors:  Cédric Gonneau; Sanjay K Mohanty; Lee H Dietterich; Wei-Ting Hwang; Jane K Willenbring; Brenda B Casper
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.192

Review 4.  Metal hyperaccumulation in plants.

Authors:  Ute Krämer
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 26.379

5.  Effect of Organic Manures on the Growth of Cymbopogon citratus and Chrysopogon zizanioides for the Phytoremediation of Chromite-Asbestos Mine Waste: A Pot Scale Experiment.

Authors:  Adarsh Kumar; Subodh Kumar Maiti
Journal:  Int J Phytoremediation       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.212

6.  Asbestos release from whole-building demolition of buildings with asbestos-containing material.

Authors:  Robert A Perkins; John Hargesheimer; Walter Fourie
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 7.  Phytoremediation of heavy metals--concepts and applications.

Authors:  Hazrat Ali; Ezzat Khan; Muhammad Anwar Sajad
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  The effects of naturally occurring acids on the surface properties of chrysotile asbestos.

Authors:  Emma P Holmes; L M Les Lavkulich
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.269

9.  Stomach cancer and occupational exposure to asbestos: a meta-analysis of occupational cohort studies.

Authors:  L Fortunato; L Rushton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Comparison of soil sampling and analytical methods for asbestos at the Sumas Mountain Asbestos Site-Working towards a toolbox for better assessment.

Authors:  Julie Wroble; Timothy Frederick; Alicia Frame; Daniel Vallero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.