Literature DB >> 28939964

Dose and dose rate extrapolation factors for malignant and non-malignant health endpoints after exposure to gamma and neutron radiation.

Van Tran1, Mark P Little2.   

Abstract

Murine experiments were conducted at the JANUS reactor in Argonne National Laboratory from 1970 to 1992 to study the effect of acute and protracted radiation dose from gamma rays and fission neutron whole body exposure. The present study reports the reanalysis of the JANUS data on 36,718 mice, of which 16,973 mice were irradiated with neutrons, 13,638 were irradiated with gamma rays, and 6107 were controls. Mice were mostly Mus musculus, but one experiment used Peromyscus leucopus. For both types of radiation exposure, a Cox proportional hazards model was used, using age as timescale, and stratifying on sex and experiment. The optimal model was one with linear and quadratic terms in cumulative lagged dose, with adjustments to both linear and quadratic dose terms for low-dose rate irradiation (<5 mGy/h) and with adjustments to the dose for age at exposure and sex. After gamma ray exposure there is significant non-linearity (generally with upward curvature) for all tumours, lymphoreticular, respiratory, connective tissue and gastrointestinal tumours, also for all non-tumour, other non-tumour, non-malignant pulmonary and non-malignant renal diseases (p < 0.001). Associated with this the low-dose extrapolation factor, measuring the overestimation in low-dose risk resulting from linear extrapolation is significantly elevated for lymphoreticular tumours 1.16 (95% CI 1.06, 1.31), elevated also for a number of non-malignant endpoints, specifically all non-tumour diseases, 1.63 (95% CI 1.43, 2.00), non-malignant pulmonary disease, 1.70 (95% CI 1.17, 2.76) and other non-tumour diseases, 1.47 (95% CI 1.29, 1.82). However, for a rather larger group of malignant endpoints the low-dose extrapolation factor is significantly less than 1 (implying downward curvature), with central estimates generally ranging from 0.2 to 0.8, in particular for tumours of the respiratory system, vasculature, ovary, kidney/urinary bladder and testis. For neutron exposure most endpoints, malignant and non-malignant, show downward curvature in the dose response, and for most endpoints this is statistically significant (p < 0.05). Associated with this, the low-dose extrapolation factor associated with neutron exposure is generally statistically significantly less than 1 for most malignant and non-malignant endpoints, with central estimates mostly in the range 0.1-0.9. In contrast to the situation at higher dose rates, there are statistically non-significant decreases of risk per unit dose at gamma dose rates of less than or equal to 5 mGy/h for most malignant endpoints, and generally non-significant increases in risk per unit dose at gamma dose rates ≤5 mGy/h for most non-malignant endpoints. Associated with this, the dose-rate extrapolation factor, the ratio of high dose-rate to low dose-rate (≤5 mGy/h) gamma dose response slopes, for many tumour sites is in the range 1.2-2.3, albeit not statistically significantly elevated from 1, while for most non-malignant endpoints the gamma dose-rate extrapolation factor is less than 1, with most estimates in the range 0.2-0.8. After neutron exposure there are non-significant indications of lower risk per unit dose at dose rates ≤5 mGy/h compared to higher dose rates for most malignant endpoints, and for all tumours (p = 0.001), and respiratory tumours (p = 0.007) this reduction is conventionally statistically significant; for most non-malignant outcomes risks per unit dose non-significantly increase at lower dose rates. Associated with this, the neutron dose-rate extrapolation factor is less than 1 for most malignant and non-malignant endpoints, in many cases statistically significantly so, with central estimates mostly in the range 0.0-0.2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; DDREF; Dose and dose-rate reduction factor; Dose rate effects; High LET; Ionising radiation; JANUS; Low dose extrapolation factor; Low dose rate; Mice; Neutrons; Non-cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28939964     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-017-0707-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  32 in total

1.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

2.  Microdosimetric basis for exposure limits.

Authors:  L W Brackenbush; L A Braby
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Life shortening in mice exposed to fission neutrons and gamma rays. VII. Effects of 60 once-weekly exposures.

Authors:  J F Thomson; D Grahn
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  The inverse dose-rate effect for oncogenic transformation by charged particles is dependent on linear energy transfer.

Authors:  R C Miller; G Randers-Pehrson; L Hieber; S A Marino; M Richards; E J Hall
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Life shortening in mice exposed to fission neutrons and gamma rays I. Single and short-term fractionated exposures.

Authors:  J F Thomson; F S Williamson; D Grahn; E J Ainsworth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Experimental radiation carcinogenesis: what have we learned?

Authors:  R J Fry
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Dose-effect models for risk-relationship to cell survival parameters.

Authors:  Alexandru Daşu; Iuliana Toma-Daşu
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  The shape of the cancer mortality dose-response curve for the A-bomb survivors.

Authors:  D A Pierce; M Vaeth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Life shortening in mice exposed to fission neutrons and gamma rays. IV. Further studies with fractionated neutron exposures.

Authors:  J F Thomson; F S Williamson; D Grahn
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  The influence of dose rate on the induction of chromosome aberrations and gene mutation after exposure of plateau phase V79-4 cells with high-LET alpha particles.

Authors:  David L Stevens; Samantha Bradley; Dudley T Goodhead; Mark A Hill
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Dose limits for occupational exposure to ionising radiation and genotoxic carcinogens: a German perspective.

Authors:  Werner Rühm; Joachim Breckow; Günter Dietze; Anna Friedl; Rüdiger Greinert; Peter Jacob; Stephan Kistinger; Rolf Michel; Wolfgang-Ulrich Müller; Heinz Otten; Christian Streffer; Wolfgang Weiss
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Lifetime Mortality Risk from Cancer and Circulatory Disease Predicted from the Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivor Life Span Study Data Taking Account of Dose Measurement Error.

Authors:  Mark P Little; David Pawel; Munechika Misumi; Nobuyuki Hamada; Harry M Cullings; Richard Wakeford; Kotaro Ozasa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Association between low doses of ionizing radiation, administered acutely or chronically, and time to onset of stroke in a rat model.

Authors:  Norio Takahashi; Munechika Misumi; Hideko Murakami; Yasuharu Niwa; Waka Ohishi; Toshiya Inaba; Akiko Nagamachi; Gen Suzuki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Risk of cancer associated with low-dose radiation exposure: comparison of results between the INWORKS nuclear workers study and the A-bomb survivors study.

Authors:  Klervi Leuraud; David B Richardson; Elisabeth Cardis; Robert D Daniels; Michael Gillies; Richard Haylock; Monika Moissonnier; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Ausrele Kesminiene; Dominique Laurier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Analyses of cancer incidence and other morbidities in gamma irradiated B6CF1 mice.

Authors:  Alia Zander; Tatjana Paunesku; Gayle E Woloschak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cyclooxygenase‑2‑mediated upregulation of heme oxygenase 1 mitigates the toxicity of deuterium‑tritium fusion radiation.

Authors:  Xiaoyao Yang; Hui Liu; Xu Jiang; Chufeng Jin; Zhao Xu; Taosheng Li; Zhigang Wang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 7.  Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast.

Authors:  Jessica S Helm; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 8.  Review of the risk of cancer following low and moderate doses of sparsely ionising radiation received in early life in groups with individually estimated doses.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; Simon D Bouffler; Kossi Abalo; Michael Hauptmann; Nobuyuki Hamada; Gerald M Kendall
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 13.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.